Bayesian Hierarchical Models and the Maximum Entropy Principle

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10252v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 22:14:23 GMT
• Title: Bayesian Hierarchical Models and the Maximum Entropy Principle
• Abstract summary: I will demonstrate that, when the prior given the hyperparameters is a canonical distribution, the dependent marginal prior also has a maximum entropy property, with a different constraint.<n>Results shed light on what information is actually being assumed when we assign a hierarchical model.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Bayesian hierarchical models are frequently used in practical data analysis contexts. One interpretation of these models is that they provide an indirect way of assigning a prior for unknown parameters, through the introduction of hyperparameters. The resulting marginal prior for the parameters (integrating over the hyperparameters) is usually dependent, so that learning one parameter provides some information about the others. In this contribution, I will demonstrate that, when the prior given the hyperparameters is a canonical distribution (a maximum entropy distribution with moment constraints), the dependent marginal prior also has a maximum entropy property, with a different constraint. This constraint is on the marginal distribution of some function of the unknown quantities. The results shed light on what information is actually being assumed when we assign a hierarchical model.

Related papers

• Scaling Exponents Across Parameterizations and Optimizers [94.54718325264218]
  We propose a new perspective on parameterization by investigating a key assumption in prior work. Our empirical investigation includes tens of thousands of models trained with all combinations of threes. We find that the best learning rate scaling prescription would often have been excluded by the assumptions in prior work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T12:32:51Z)
• Overparameterized Multiple Linear Regression as Hyper-Curve Fitting [0.0]
  It is proven that a linear model will produce exact predictions even in the presence of nonlinear dependencies that violate the model assumptions. The hyper-curve approach is especially suited for the regularization of problems with noise in predictor variables and can be used to remove noisy and "improper" predictors from the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T15:43:11Z)
• Should We Learn Most Likely Functions or Parameters? [51.133793272222874]
  We investigate the benefits and drawbacks of directly estimating the most likely function implied by the model and the data. We find that function-space MAP estimation can lead to flatter minima, better generalization, and improved to overfitting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T16:39:55Z)
• PriorCVAE: scalable MCMC parameter inference with Bayesian deep generative modelling [12.820453440015553]
  Recent have shown that GP priors can be encoded using deep generative models such as variational autoencoders (VAEs) We show how VAEs can serve as drop-in replacements for the original priors during MCMC inference. We propose PriorCVAE to encode solutions of ODEs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-09T20:23:26Z)
• The Choice of Noninformative Priors for Thompson Sampling in Multiparameter Bandit Models [56.31310344616837]
  Thompson sampling (TS) has been known for its outstanding empirical performance supported by theoretical guarantees across various reward models. This study explores the impact of selecting noninformative priors, offering insights into the performance of TS when dealing with new models that lack theoretical understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T08:42:42Z)
• Instance-Dependent Generalization Bounds via Optimal Transport [51.71650746285469]
  Existing generalization bounds fail to explain crucial factors that drive the generalization of modern neural networks. We derive instance-dependent generalization bounds that depend on the local Lipschitz regularity of the learned prediction function in the data space. We empirically analyze our generalization bounds for neural networks, showing that the bound values are meaningful and capture the effect of popular regularization methods during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T16:39:42Z)
• Entropy-based Characterization of Modeling Constraints [0.0]
  In most data-scientific approaches, the principle of Entropy (MaxEnt) is used to justify some parametric model. We derive the distribution over all viable distributions that satisfy the provided set of constraints. The appropriate parametric model which is supported by the data can be always deduced at the end of model selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-27T17:25:49Z)
• Far from Asymptopia [0.0]
  Inference from limited data requires a notion of measure on parameter space, most explicit in the Bayesian framework as a prior. Here we demonstrate that Jeffreys prior, the best-known uninformative choice, introduces enormous bias when applied to typical scientific models. We present results on a principled choice of measure which avoids this issue, leading to unbiased inference in complex models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-06T16:23:12Z)
• Post-mortem on a deep learning contest: a Simpson's paradox and the complementary roles of scale metrics versus shape metrics [61.49826776409194]
  We analyze a corpus of models made publicly-available for a contest to predict the generalization accuracy of neural network (NN) models. We identify what amounts to a Simpson's paradox: where "scale" metrics perform well overall but perform poorly on sub partitions of the data. We present two novel shape metrics, one data-independent, and the other data-dependent, which can predict trends in the test accuracy of a series of NNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T19:19:49Z)
• On the minmax regret for statistical manifolds: the role of curvature [68.8204255655161]
  Two-part codes and the minimum description length have been successful in delivering procedures to single out the best models. We derive a sharper expression than the standard one given by the complexity, where the scalar curvature of the Fisher information metric plays a dominant role.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-06T17:28:19Z)
• Fundamental Limits of Ridge-Regularized Empirical Risk Minimization in High Dimensions [41.7567932118769]
  Empirical Risk Minimization algorithms are widely used in a variety of estimation and prediction tasks. In this paper, we characterize for the first time the fundamental limits on the statistical accuracy of convex ERM for inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T04:27:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.