Trust Oriented Explainable AI for Fake News Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11778v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 10:37:28 GMT
• Title: Trust Oriented Explainable AI for Fake News Detection
• Abstract summary: This article examines the application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in NLP based fake news detection.<n>The work outlines key aspects of disinformation, neural network architectures, and XAI techniques, with a focus on SHAP, LIME, and Integrated Gradients.<n>The results show that XAI enhances model transparency and interpretability while maintaining high detection accuracy.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This article examines the application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in NLP based fake news detection and compares selected interpretability methods. The work outlines key aspects of disinformation, neural network architectures, and XAI techniques, with a focus on SHAP, LIME, and Integrated Gradients. In the experimental study, classification models were implemented and interpreted using these methods. The results show that XAI enhances model transparency and interpretability while maintaining high detection accuracy. Each method provides distinct explanatory value: SHAP offers detailed local attributions, LIME provides simple and intuitive explanations, and Integrated Gradients performs efficiently with convolutional models. The study also highlights limitations such as computational cost and sensitivity to parameterization. Overall, the findings demonstrate that integrating XAI with NLP is an effective approach to improving the reliability and trustworthiness of fake news detection systems.

Related papers

• Learning to Explore: Policy-Guided Outlier Synthesis for Graph Out-of-Distribution Detection [51.93878677594561]
  In unsupervised graph-level OOD detection, models are typically trained using only in-distribution (ID) data.<n>We propose a Policy-Guided Outlier Synthesis framework that replaces statics with a learned exploration strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-28T11:40:18Z)
• TranX-Adapter: Bridging Artifacts and Semantics within MLLMs for Robust AI-generated Image Detection [70.42796551833946]
  incorporating texture-level artifact features alongside semantic features into multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can enhance their AIGI detection capability.<n>We propose a lightweight fusion adapter, TranX-Adapter, which integrates a Task-aware Optimal-Transport Fusion.<n>Experiments on standard AIGI detection benchmarks upon several advanced MLLMs, show that our TranX-Adapter brings consistent and significant improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T09:22:46Z)
• Revisiting Logit Distributions for Reliable Out-of-Distribution Detection [73.9121001113687]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is critical for ensuring the reliability of deep learning models in open-world applications.<n>LogitGap is a novel post-hoc OOD detection method that exploits the relationship between the maximum logit and the remaining logits.<n>We show that LogitGap consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse OOD detection scenarios and benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T02:16:45Z)
• SCENE: Evaluating Explainable AI Techniques Using Soft Counterfactuals [0.0]
  This paper introduces SCENE (Soft Counterfactual Evaluation for Natural language Explainability), a novel evaluation method. By focusing on token-based substitutions, SCENE creates contextually appropriate and semantically meaningful Soft Counterfactuals. SCENE provides valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of various XAI techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T16:36:24Z)
• Robustness of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Industrial Process Modelling [43.388607981317016]
  We evaluate current XAI methods by scoring them based on ground truth simulations and sensitivity analysis. We show the differences between XAI methods in their ability to correctly predict the true sensitivity of the modeled industrial process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T09:46:26Z)
• EXACT: Towards a platform for empirically benchmarking Machine Learning model explanation methods [1.6383837447674294]
  This paper brings together various benchmark datasets and novel performance metrics in an initial benchmarking platform. Our datasets incorporate ground truth explanations for class-conditional features. This platform assesses the performance of post-hoc XAI methods in the quality of the explanations they produce.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T14:16:06Z)
• Assessing Fidelity in XAI post-hoc techniques: A Comparative Study with Ground Truth Explanations Datasets [0.0]
  XAI methods based on the backpropagation of output information to input yield higher accuracy and reliability. Backpropagation method tends to generate more noisy saliency maps. Findings have significant implications for the advancement of XAI methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T14:57:24Z)
• Physics Inspired Hybrid Attention for SAR Target Recognition [61.01086031364307]
  We propose a physics inspired hybrid attention (PIHA) mechanism and the once-for-all (OFA) evaluation protocol to address the issues. PIHA leverages the high-level semantics of physical information to activate and guide the feature group aware of local semantics of target. Our method outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches in 12 test scenarios with same ASC parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:39:41Z)
• Energy-based Out-of-Distribution Detection for Graph Neural Networks [76.0242218180483]
  We propose a simple, powerful and efficient OOD detection model for GNN-based learning on graphs, which we call GNNSafe. GNNSafe achieves up to $17.0%$ AUROC improvement over state-of-the-arts and it could serve as simple yet strong baselines in such an under-developed area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T16:38:43Z)
• Evaluating Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods for Multi-label Deep Learning Classification Tasks in Remote Sensing [0.0]
  We develop deep learning models with state-of-the-art performance in benchmark datasets. Ten XAI methods were employed towards understanding and interpreting models' predictions. Occlusion, Grad-CAM and Lime were the most interpretable and reliable XAI methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-03T11:13:14Z)
• Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition [110.64368106131062]
  We present a general methodology for interpretable evaluation for the named entity recognition (NER) task. The proposed evaluation method enables us to interpret the differences in models and datasets, as well as the interplay between them. By making our analysis tool available, we make it easy for future researchers to run similar analyses and drive progress in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:53:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.