TAS-GNN: A Status-Aware Signed Graph Neural Network for Anomaly Detection in Bitcoin Trust Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13290v1
• Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 04:51:04 GMT
• Title: TAS-GNN: A Status-Aware Signed Graph Neural Network for Anomaly Detection in Bitcoin Trust Systems
• Abstract summary: Financial platforms rely heavily on Web of Trust reputation systems to mitigate counterparty risk.<n> TAS-GNN is a novel framework designed for feature-sparse signed networks like Bitcoin-Alpha.<n>Experiments demonstrate that TAS-GNN achieves state-of-the-art performance, significantly outperforming existing signed GNN baselines.
• Score: 5.394391343109767
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Decentralized financial platforms rely heavily on Web of Trust reputation systems to mitigate counterparty risk in the absence of centralized identity verification. However, these pseudonymous networks are inherently vulnerable to adversarial behaviors, such as Sybil attacks and camouflaged fraud, where malicious actors cultivate artificial reputations before executing exit scams. Traditional anomaly detection in this domain faces two critical limitations. First, reliance on naive statistical heuristics (e.g., flagging the lowest 5% of rated users) fails to distinguish between victims of bad-mouthing attacks and actual fraudsters. Second, standard Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) operate on the assumption of homophily and cannot effectively process the semantic inversion inherent in signed (trust vs. distrust) and directed (status) edges. We propose TAS-GNN (Topology-Aware Signed Graph Neural Network), a novel framework designed for feature-sparse signed networks like Bitcoin-Alpha. TAS-GNN integrates recursive Web-of-Trust labeling and a dual-channel message-passing architecture that separately models trust and distrust signals, fused through a Status-Aware Attention mechanism. Experiments demonstrate that TAS-GNN achieves state-of-the-art performance, significantly outperforming existing signed GNN baselines.

Related papers

• Defending Network Intrusion Detection Systems Based on Graph Neural Networks Against Structural Adversarial Attacks [3.444915014411325]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) represent a promising solution for Machine Learning (ML) based Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS)<n>GNNs remain vulnerable to structural adversarial attacks, where an attacker perturbs the underlying network graph topology by injecting edges or inserting nodes.<n>We propose a defense framework based on adversarial training to strengthen GNN-based NIDS against structural attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T12:06:12Z)
• Towards Quantum-Ready Blockchain Fraud Detection via Ensemble Graph Neural Networks [0.0]
  We propose an ensemble framework that integrates Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN), Graph Attention Networks (GAT), and Graph Isomorphism Networks (GIN)<n>Using the real-world Elliptic dataset, our tuned soft voting ensemble achieves high recall of illicit transactions while maintaining a false positive rate below 1%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T04:17:23Z)
• Exact Certification of (Graph) Neural Networks Against Label Poisoning [50.87615167799367]
  We introduce an exact certification method for label flipping in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)<n>We apply our method to certify a broad range of GNN architectures in node classification tasks.<n>Our work presents the first exact certificate to a poisoning attack ever derived for neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-30T17:05:12Z)
• Are Your Models Still Fair? Fairness Attacks on Graph Neural Networks via Node Injections [28.86365261170078]
  Research has revealed the fairness vulnerabilities in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) when facing malicious adversarial attacks. We introduce a Node Injection-based Fairness Attack (NIFA) exploring the vulnerabilities of GNN fairness in such a more realistic setting. NIFA can significantly undermine the fairness of mainstream GNNs, even including fairness-aware GNNs, by injecting merely 1% of nodes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T08:26:53Z)
• Securing Graph Neural Networks in MLaaS: A Comprehensive Realization of Query-based Integrity Verification [68.86863899919358]
  We introduce a groundbreaking approach to protect GNN models in Machine Learning from model-centric attacks. Our approach includes a comprehensive verification schema for GNN's integrity, taking into account both transductive and inductive GNNs. We propose a query-based verification technique, fortified with innovative node fingerprint generation algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T03:17:05Z)
• Certified Defense on the Fairness of Graph Neural Networks [86.14235652889242]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as a prominent graph learning model in various graph-based tasks.<n> malicious attackers could easily corrupt the fairness level of their predictions by adding perturbations to the input graph data.<n>We propose a principled framework named ELEGANT to study a novel problem of certifiable defense on the fairness level of GNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-05T20:29:40Z)
• Transaction Fraud Detection via an Adaptive Graph Neural Network [64.9428588496749]
  We propose an Adaptive Sampling and Aggregation-based Graph Neural Network (ASA-GNN) that learns discriminative representations to improve the performance of transaction fraud detection. A neighbor sampling strategy is performed to filter noisy nodes and supplement information for fraudulent nodes. Experiments on three real financial datasets demonstrate that the proposed method ASA-GNN outperforms state-of-the-art ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T07:48:39Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Graph Neural Networks: Privacy, Robustness, Fairness, and Explainability [59.80140875337769]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have made rapid developments in the recent years. GNNs can leak private information, are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, can inherit and magnify societal bias from training data. This paper gives a comprehensive survey of GNNs in the computational aspects of privacy, robustness, fairness, and explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-18T21:41:07Z)
• HufuNet: Embedding the Left Piece as Watermark and Keeping the Right Piece for Ownership Verification in Deep Neural Networks [16.388046449021466]
  We propose a novel solution for watermarking deep neural networks (DNNs) HufuNet is highly robust against model fine-tuning/pruning, kernels cutoff/supplement, functionality-equivalent attack, and fraudulent ownership claims.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-25T06:55:22Z)
• Uncertainty-aware Attention Graph Neural Network for Defending Adversarial Attacks [21.63854538768414]
  Existing graph neural networks (GNNs) serve as a black-box in predicting and do not provide uncertainty on predictions. We propose UAG, the first systematic solution to defend adversarial attacks on GNNs. Our proposed defense approach outperforms the state-of-the-art solutions by a significant margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-22T00:46:40Z)
• Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsters [78.53851936180348]
  We introduce two types of camouflages based on recent empirical studies, i.e., the feature camouflage and the relation camouflage. Existing GNNs have not addressed these two camouflages, which results in their poor performance in fraud detection problems. We propose a new model named CAmouflage-REsistant GNN (CARE-GNN) to enhance the GNN aggregation process with three unique modules against camouflages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-19T22:33:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.