Dynamic Meta-Layer Aggregation for Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16846v1
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:54:00 GMT
- Title: Dynamic Meta-Layer Aggregation for Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning
- Abstract summary: Federated Learning systems are susceptible to Byzantine adversaries that inject malicious updates.<n>We propose FedAOT, a novel defense mechanism that counters multi-label flipping and untargeted poisoning attacks.<n>We show that FedAOT substantially improves model accuracy and resilience while maintaining computational efficiency.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) is increasingly applied in sectors like healthcare, finance, and IoT, enabling collaborative model training while safeguarding user privacy. However, FL systems are susceptible to Byzantine adversaries that inject malicious updates, which can severely compromise global model performance. Existing defenses tend to focus on specific attack types and fail against untargeted strategies, such as multi-label flipping or combinations of noise and backdoor patterns. To overcome these limitations, we propose FedAOT-a novel defense mechanism that counters multi-label flipping and untargeted poisoning attacks using a metalearning-inspired adaptive aggregation framework. FedAOT dynamically weights client updates based on their reliability, suppressing adversarial influence without relying on predefined thresholds or restrictive attack assumptions. Notably, FedAOT generalizes effectively across diverse datasets and a wide range of attack types, maintaining robust performance even in previously unseen scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that FedAOT substantially improves model accuracy and resilience while maintaining computational efficiency, offering a scalable and practical solution for secure federated learning.
Related papers
- Adaptive Dual-Weighting Framework for Federated Learning via Out-of-Distribution Detection [53.45696787935487]
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across large-scale distributed service nodes.<n>In real-world service-oriented deployments, data generated by heterogeneous users, devices, and application scenarios are inherently non-IID.<n>We propose FLood, a novel FL framework inspired by out-of-distribution (OOD) detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-01T05:54:59Z) - FLARE: Adaptive Multi-Dimensional Reputation for Robust Client Reliability in Federated Learning [0.6524460254566904]
Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training while preserving data privacy.<n>It remains vulnerable to malicious clients who compromise model integrity through Byzantine attacks, data poisoning, or adaptive adversarial behaviors.<n>We propose FLARE, an adaptive reputation-based framework that transforms client reliability assessment from binary decisions to a continuous, multi-dimensional trust evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-18T17:57:40Z) - FLAegis: A Two-Layer Defense Framework for Federated Learning Against Poisoning Attacks [2.6599014990168843]
Federated Learning (FL) has become a powerful technique for training Machine Learning (ML) models in a decentralized manner.<n>Third parties, known as Byzantine clients, can poison the training process by submitting false model updates.<n>This study introduces FLAegis, a two-stage defensive framework designed to identify Byzantine clients and improve the robustness of FL systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-26T07:09:15Z) - DOPA: Stealthy and Generalizable Backdoor Attacks from a Single Client under Challenging Federated Constraints [2.139012072214621]
Federated Learning (FL) is increasingly adopted for privacy-preserving collaborative training, but its decentralized nature makes it susceptible to backdoor attacks.<n>Existing attack methods, however, often rely on idealized assumptions and fail to remain effective under real-world constraints.<n>We propose DOPA, a novel framework that simulates heterogeneous local training dynamics and seeks consensus across divergent optimization trajectories to craft universally effective and stealthy backdoor triggers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-20T08:39:12Z) - MISLEADER: Defending against Model Extraction with Ensembles of Distilled Models [56.09354775405601]
Model extraction attacks aim to replicate the functionality of a black-box model through query access.<n>Most existing defenses presume that attacker queries have out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, enabling them to detect and disrupt suspicious inputs.<n>We propose MISLEADER, a novel defense strategy that does not rely on OOD assumptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T01:37:09Z) - R-TPT: Improving Adversarial Robustness of Vision-Language Models through Test-Time Prompt Tuning [69.72249695674665]
We propose a robust test-time prompt tuning (R-TPT) for vision-language models (VLMs)<n>R-TPT mitigates the impact of adversarial attacks during the inference stage.<n>We introduce a plug-and-play reliability-based weighted ensembling strategy to strengthen the defense.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-15T13:49:31Z) - Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning Using Generative Adversarial Networks [1.4091801425319963]
Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed clients without sharing raw data, but its robustness is threatened by Byzantine behaviors such as data and model poisoning.<n>We present a defense framework that addresses these challenges by leveraging a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) at the server to synthesize representative data for validating client updates.<n>This approach eliminates reliance on external datasets, adapts to diverse attack strategies, and integrates seamlessly into standard FL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-26T18:00:56Z) - Celtibero: Robust Layered Aggregation for Federated Learning [0.0]
We introduce Celtibero, a novel defense mechanism that integrates layered aggregation to enhance robustness against adversarial manipulation.
We demonstrate that Celtibero consistently achieves high main task accuracy (MTA) while maintaining minimal attack success rates (ASR) across a range of untargeted and targeted poisoning attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-26T12:54:00Z) - FedRDF: A Robust and Dynamic Aggregation Function against Poisoning
Attacks in Federated Learning [0.0]
Federated Learning (FL) represents a promising approach to typical privacy concerns associated with centralized Machine Learning (ML) deployments.
Despite its well-known advantages, FL is vulnerable to security attacks such as Byzantine behaviors and poisoning attacks.
Our proposed approach was tested against various model poisoning attacks, demonstrating superior performance over state-of-the-art aggregation methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T16:42:04Z) - FreqFed: A Frequency Analysis-Based Approach for Mitigating Poisoning
Attacks in Federated Learning [98.43475653490219]
Federated learning (FL) is susceptible to poisoning attacks.
FreqFed is a novel aggregation mechanism that transforms the model updates into the frequency domain.
We demonstrate that FreqFed can mitigate poisoning attacks effectively with a negligible impact on the utility of the aggregated model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T16:56:24Z) - Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric
Investigations [55.2480439325792]
Federated Learning (FL) facilitates decentralized machine learning model training, preserving data privacy, lowering communication costs, and boosting model performance through diversified data sources.
FL faces vulnerabilities such as poisoning attacks, undermining model integrity with both untargeted performance degradation and targeted backdoor attacks.
We define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries, capable of adapting to multiple objectives simultaneously.
MESAS is the first defense robust against strong adaptive adversaries, effective in real-world data scenarios, with an average overhead of just 24.37 seconds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-06T11:44:42Z) - FLIP: A Provable Defense Framework for Backdoor Mitigation in Federated
Learning [66.56240101249803]
We study how hardening benign clients can affect the global model (and the malicious clients)
We propose a trigger reverse engineering based defense and show that our method can achieve improvement with guarantee robustness.
Our results on eight competing SOTA defense methods show the empirical superiority of our method on both single-shot and continuous FL backdoor attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-23T22:24:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.