A Progressive Visual-Logic-Aligned Framework for Ride-Hailing Adjudication

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17328v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 03:46:30 GMT
• Title: A Progressive Visual-Logic-Aligned Framework for Ride-Hailing Adjudication
• Abstract summary: RideJudge is a Progressive Visual-Logic-Aligned Framework to bridge the gap between general visual semantics and rigorous evidentiary protocols.<n>Our framework achieves 88.41% accuracy, surpassing 32B-scale baselines and establishing a new standard for interpretable adjudication.
• Score: 19.51385161254594
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The efficient adjudication of responsibility disputes is pivotal for maintaining marketplace fairness. However, the exponential surge in ride-hailing volume renders manual review intractable, while conventional automated methods lack the reasoning transparency required for quasi-judicial decisions. Although Multimodal LLMs offer a promising paradigm, they fundamentally struggle to bridge the gap between general visual semantics and rigorous evidentiary protocols, often leading to perceptual hallucinations and logical looseness. To address these systemic misalignments, we introduce RideJudge, a Progressive Visual-Logic-Aligned Framework. Instead of relying on generic pre-training, we bridge the semantic gap via SynTraj, a synthesis engine that grounds abstract liability concepts into concrete trajectory patterns. To resolve the conflict between massive regulation volume and limited context windows, we propose an Adaptive Context Optimization strategy that distills expert knowledge, coupled with a Chain-of-Adjudication mechanism to enforce active evidentiary inquiry. Furthermore, addressing the inadequacy of sparse binary feedback for complex liability assessment, we implement a novel Ordinal-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning mechanism that calibrates decision boundaries against hierarchical severity. Extensive experiments show that our RideJudge-8B achieves 88.41\% accuracy, surpassing 32B-scale baselines and establishing a new standard for interpretable adjudication.

Related papers

• Balancing Efficiency and Efficacy: Training-Free Attention-Guided Switching Between Explicit and Latent Thoughts for MLLMs [44.74237674161132]
  Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) requires both fine-grained visual perception and rigorous logical deduction.<n>Explicit text-based Chain-of-Thought (CoT) is computationally expensive and prone to visual hallucinations.<n>Existing latent reasoning methods typically require costly training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T10:46:10Z)
• Breaking the Filter Bubble: A Semantic Pareto-DQN Framework for Multi-Objective Recommendation [0.23332469289621785]
  We introduce a multi-objective reinforcement learning framework that formalizes recommendation as a semantic multi-objective Markov decision process.<n>Our architecture treats engagement, diversity, and fairness as distinct, non-aggregable reward signals, avoiding the pitfalls of static reward scalarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T00:58:16Z)
• R-C2: Cycle-Consistent Reinforcement Learning Improves Multimodal Reasoning [20.899863841051662]
  Cross-modal inconsistency provides a rich and natural signal for learning.<n>We introduce RC2, a reinforcement learning framework that resolves internal conflicts by enforcing cross-modal cycle consistency.<n>Our results suggest that advanced reasoning emerges not only from scaling data, but also from enforcing a structurally consistent understanding of the world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T17:58:04Z)
• Mechanistic Foundations of Goal-Directed Control [0.0]
  We show that foundational biases give rise to causal control circuits, with learned gating mechanisms converging toward theoretically motivated uncertainty thresholds.<n>This work sharpens mechanistic accounts of cognitive development and provides principled guidance for the design of interpretable embodied agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T13:19:34Z)
• Hit-RAG: Learning to Reason with Long Contexts via Preference Alignment [97.55382322103986]
  Hit-RAG is a multi-stage preference alignment framework designed to resolve cognitive bottlenecks.<n>Our approach systematically refines the utilization of external evidence via three distinct stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-07T04:05:27Z)
• LaSER: Internalizing Explicit Reasoning into Latent Space for Dense Retrieval [74.72139580745511]
  LaSER is a novel self-distillation framework that internalizes explicit reasoning into the latent space of retrievers.<n>Our method successfully combines the reasoning depth of explicit CoT pipelines with the inference efficiency of standard dense retrievers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T04:11:18Z)
• OmniVL-Guard: Towards Unified Vision-Language Forgery Detection and Grounding via Balanced RL [63.388513841293616]
  Existing forgery detection methods fail to handle the interleaved text, images, and videos prevalent in real-world misinformation.<n>To bridge this gap, this paper targets to develop a unified framework for omnibus vision-language forgery detection and grounding.<n>We propose textbf OmniVL-Guard, a balanced reinforcement learning framework for omnibus vision-language forgery detection and grounding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T09:41:36Z)
• Asymmetric Hierarchical Anchoring for Audio-Visual Joint Representation: Resolving Information Allocation Ambiguity for Robust Cross-Modal Generalization [19.721857318111734]
  We propose Asymmetric Hierarchical Anchoring (AHA) to enforce directional information allocation.<n>We replace fragile mutual information estimators with a GRL-based adversarial decoupler that explicitly suppresses semantic leakage.<n>AHA consistently outperforms symmetric baselines in cross-modal transfer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T14:14:03Z)
• Analyzing Reasoning Consistency in Large Multimodal Models under Cross-Modal Conflicts [74.47786985522762]
  We identify a critical failure mode termed textual inertia, where models tend to blindly adhere to the erroneous text while neglecting conflicting visual evidence.<n>We propose the LogicGraph Perturbation Protocol that structurally injects perturbations into the reasoning chains of diverse LMMs.<n>Results reveal that models successfully self-correct in less than 10% of cases and predominantly succumb to blind textual error propagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T16:39:34Z)
• Drift No More? Context Equilibria in Multi-Turn LLM Interactions [58.69551510148673]
  contexts drift is the gradual divergence of a model's outputs from goal-consistent behavior across turns.<n>Unlike single-turn errors, drift unfolds temporally and is poorly captured by static evaluation metrics.<n>We show that multi-turn drift can be understood as a controllable equilibrium phenomenon rather than as inevitable decay.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T04:48:49Z)
• Steerable Adversarial Scenario Generation through Test-Time Preference Alignment [58.37104890690234]
  Adversarial scenario generation is a cost-effective approach for safety assessment of autonomous driving systems.<n>We introduce a new framework named textbfSteerable textbfAdversarial scenario textbfGEnerator (SAGE)<n>SAGE enables fine-grained test-time control over the trade-off between adversariality and realism without any retraining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T13:27:35Z)
• LatentGuard: Controllable Latent Steering for Robust Refusal of Attacks and Reliable Response Generation [4.29885665563186]
  LATENTGUARD is a framework that combines behavioral alignment with supervised latent space control for interpretable and precise safety steering.<n>Our results show significant improvements in both safety controllability and response interpretability without compromising utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T07:31:54Z)
• MARBLE: A Multi-Agent Rule-Based LLM Reasoning Engine for Accident Severity Prediction [1.3102025155414727]
  Accident severity prediction plays a critical role in transportation safety systems.<n>Existing methods often rely on monolithic models or black box prompting.<n>We propose a multiagent rule based LLM engine that decomposes the severity prediction task across a team of specialized reasoning agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T11:27:49Z)
• Sycophancy in Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Analysis and an Inference-Time Mitigation Framework [18.54098084470481]
  We analyze sycophancy across vision-language benchmarks and propose an inference-time mitigation framework.<n>Our framework effectively mitigates sycophancy across all evaluated models, while maintaining performance on neutral prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T01:03:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.