Causal Representation Learning on High-Dimensional Data: Benchmarks, Reproducibility, and Evaluation Metrics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17405v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 06:31:01 GMT
• Title: Causal Representation Learning on High-Dimensional Data: Benchmarks, Reproducibility, and Evaluation Metrics
• Abstract summary: Causal representation learning models aim to transform high-dimensional data into a latent space.<n>A variety of synthetic and real-world datasets have been proposed, each with distinct advantages and limitations.
• Score: 15.583733903108643
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Causal representation learning (CRL) models aim to transform high-dimensional data into a latent space, enabling interventions to generate counterfactual samples or modify existing data based on the causal relationships among latent variables. To facilitate the development and evaluation of these models, a variety of synthetic and real-world datasets have been proposed, each with distinct advantages and limitations. For practical applications, CRL models must perform robustly across multiple evaluation directions, including reconstruction, disentanglement, causal discovery, and counterfactual reasoning, using appropriate metrics for each direction. However, this multi-directional evaluation can complicate model comparison, as a model may excel in some direction while under-performing in others. Another significant challenge in this field is reproducibility: the source code corresponding to published results must be publicly available, and repeated runs should yield performance consistent with the original reports. In this study, we critically analyzed the synthetic and real-world datasets currently employed in the literature, highlighting their limitations and proposing a set of essential characteristics for suitable datasets in CRL model development. We also introduce a single aggregate metric that consolidates performance across all evaluation directions, providing a comprehensive score for each model. Finally, we reviewed existing implementations from the literature and assessed them in terms of reproducibility, identifying gaps and best practices in the field.

Related papers

• How Can AI Find My Model? A Model-Finding Experimental Study Considering Data Formats, Embeddings, and Retrieval Strategies [0.0]
  We present an experimental study investigating the impact of data representation, transformer-based embedding models, and retrieval strategies on the discovery of simulation models using natural language queries.<n>Results show that data representation matters, open-source embedding models can achieve high performance, and reranking methods are important, especially as query increases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-29T19:23:32Z)
• The LLM Data Auditor: A Metric-oriented Survey on Quality and Trustworthiness in Evaluating Synthetic Data [25.926467401802046]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for generating data across various modalities.<n>We propose a framework for evaluating synthetic data from two dimensions: quality and trustworthiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T06:40:25Z)
• Nonparametric Data Attribution for Diffusion Models [57.820618036556084]
  Data attribution for generative models seeks to quantify the influence of individual training examples on model outputs.<n>We propose a nonparametric attribution method that operates entirely on data, measuring influence via patch-level similarity between generated and training images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T03:37:16Z)
• Model Correlation Detection via Random Selection Probing [62.093777777813756]
  Existing similarity-based methods require access to model parameters or produce scores without thresholds.<n>We introduce Random Selection Probing (RSP), a hypothesis-testing framework that formulates model correlation detection as a statistical test.<n>RSP produces rigorous p-values that quantify evidence of correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T01:40:26Z)
• Prismatic Synthesis: Gradient-based Data Diversification Boosts Generalization in LLM Reasoning [77.120955854093]
  We show that data diversity can be a strong predictor of generalization in language models.<n>We introduce G-Vendi, a metric that quantifies diversity via the entropy of model-induced gradients.<n>We present Prismatic Synthesis, a framework for generating diverse synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T16:05:10Z)
• Benchmarking community drug response prediction models: datasets, models, tools, and metrics for cross-dataset generalization analysis [36.689210473887904]
  We introduce a benchmarking framework for evaluating cross-dataset prediction generalization in deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) models.<n>We quantify both absolute performance (e.g., predictive accuracy across datasets) and relative performance (e.g., performance drop compared to within-dataset results)<n>Our results reveal substantial performance drops when models are tested on unseen datasets, underscoring the importance of rigorous generalization assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T15:40:18Z)
• Towards Robust Universal Information Extraction: Benchmark, Evaluation, and Solution [66.11004226578771]
  Existing robust benchmark datasets have two key limitations.<n>They generate only a limited range of perturbations for a single Information Extraction (IE) task.<n>Considering the powerful generation capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), we introduce a new benchmark dataset for Robust UIE, called RUIE-Bench.<n>We show that training with only textbf15% of the data leads to an average textbf7.5% relative performance improvement across three IE tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:39:29Z)
• Optimizing Sequential Recommendation Models with Scaling Laws and Approximate Entropy [104.48511402784763]
  Performance Law for SR models aims to theoretically investigate and model the relationship between model performance and data quality.<n>We propose Approximate Entropy (ApEn) to assess data quality, presenting a more nuanced approach compared to traditional data quantity metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-30T10:56:30Z)
• Testing Generalizability in Causal Inference [3.547529079746247]
  No formal procedure exists for statistically evaluating generalizability in machine learning algorithms.<n>We propose a systematic framework for statistically evaluating the generalizability of high-dimensional causal inference models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T11:44:00Z)
• Graph-based Unsupervised Disentangled Representation Learning via Multimodal Large Language Models [42.17166746027585]
  We introduce a bidirectional weighted graph-based framework to learn factorized attributes and their interrelations within complex data. Specifically, we propose a $beta$-VAE based module to extract factors as the initial nodes of the graph. By integrating these complementary modules, our model successfully achieves fine-grained, practical and unsupervised disentanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T15:32:21Z)
• Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Text Summarization [52.765898203824975]
  We introduce inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) as an effective paradigm for training abstractive summarization models. Experimental results across datasets in different domains demonstrate the superiority of our proposed IRL model for summarization over MLE and RL baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T23:45:05Z)
• Discover, Explanation, Improvement: An Automatic Slice Detection Framework for Natural Language Processing [72.14557106085284]
  slice detection models (SDM) automatically identify underperforming groups of datapoints. This paper proposes a benchmark named "Discover, Explain, improve (DEIM)" for classification NLP tasks. Our evaluation shows that Edisa can accurately select error-prone datapoints with informative semantic features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-08T19:00:00Z)
• Synthetic Benchmarks for Scientific Research in Explainable Machine Learning [14.172740234933215]
  We release XAI-Bench: a suite of synthetic datasets and a library for benchmarking feature attribution algorithms. Unlike real-world datasets, synthetic datasets allow the efficient computation of conditional expected values. We demonstrate the power of our library by benchmarking popular explainability techniques across several evaluation metrics and identifying failure modes for popular explainers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-23T17:10:21Z)
• How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Models [95.8037674226622]
  We introduce a 3-dimensional evaluation metric that characterizes the fidelity, diversity and generalization performance of any generative model in a domain-agnostic fashion. Our metric unifies statistical divergence measures with precision-recall analysis, enabling sample- and distribution-level diagnoses of model fidelity and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T18:25:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.