Revisiting Gene Ontology Knowledge Discovery with Hierarchical Feature Selection and Virtual Study Group of AI Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20132v1
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 17:00:36 GMT
- Title: Revisiting Gene Ontology Knowledge Discovery with Hierarchical Feature Selection and Virtual Study Group of AI Agents
- Abstract summary: We propose a novel agentic AI-based knowledge discovery-oriented virtual study group.<n>It aims to extract meaningful ageing-related biological knowledge considering highly ageing-related Gene Ontology terms.<n>It is found that the majority of the AI agent-generated scientific claims can be supported by existing literatures.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Large language models have achieved great success in multiple challenging tasks, and their capacity can be further boosted by the emerging agentic AI techniques. This new computing paradigm has already started revolutionising the traditional scientific discovery pipelines. In this work, we propose a novel agentic AI-based knowledge discovery-oriented virtual study group that aims to extract meaningful ageing-related biological knowledge considering highly ageing-related Gene Ontology terms that are selected by hierarchical feature selection methods. We investigate the performance of the proposed agentic AI framework by considering four different model organisms' ageing-related Gene Ontology terms and validate the biological findings by reviewing existing research articles. It is found that the majority of the AI agent-generated scientific claims can be supported by existing literatures and the proposed internal mechanisms of the virtual study group also play an important role in the designed agentic AI-based knowledge discovery framework.
Related papers
- AI Scientists as Engines of Discovery: A Case for Development within Reformed Institutions [0.10102237605686408]
Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems are beginning to assist, accelerate, and partially automate scientific discovery.<n>We argue that suitably designed multi-agent systems may evolve from passive computational tools into AI scientists''<n>Such systems must be developed and deployed within a scientific ecosystem fit for purpose.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-22T05:06:29Z) - Intentmaking and Sensemaking: Human Interaction with AI-Guided Mathematical Discovery [72.49593499512092]
We identify and characterize a distinct workflow we term intentmaking.<n>We frame this as a natural extension to sensemaking.<n>Our documentation of these themes suggests an approach to designing AI tools for scientific discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-07T09:30:25Z) - Towards a Medical AI Scientist [73.6056699962416]
We introduce Medical AI Scientist, the first autonomous research framework tailored to clinical autonomous research.<n>The framework operates under 3 research modes, namely paper-based reproduction, literature-inspired innovation, and task-driven exploration.<n>Our system achieves strong alignment between the proposed method and its implementation, while also demonstrating significantly higher success rates in executable experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-30T15:37:25Z) - From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery [108.1082357960201]
Agentic AI shows capabilities in hypothesis generation, experimental design, execution, analysis, and iterative refinement.<n>This survey provides a domain-oriented review of autonomous scientific discovery across life sciences, chemistry, materials science, and physics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-18T05:25:54Z) - Simulating Biological Intelligence: Active Inference with Experiment-Informed Generative Model [2.003941363902692]
We propose a framework rooted in active inference to model decision-making in embodied agents.<n>Using experiment-informed generative models, we simulate decision-making processes in a simulated game-play environment.<n>Our results provide insights into the role of memory-based learning and predictive planning in intelligent decision-making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-09T13:26:38Z) - From Automation to Autonomy: A Survey on Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery [67.07598263346591]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are catalyzing a paradigm shift in scientific discovery.<n>This survey systematically charts this burgeoning field, placing a central focus on the changing roles and escalating capabilities of LLMs in science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-19T15:41:32Z) - AI-Driven Automation Can Become the Foundation of Next-Era Science of Science Research [58.944125758758936]
The Science of Science (SoS) explores the mechanisms underlying scientific discovery.<n>The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) presents a transformative opportunity for the next generation of SoS.<n>We outline the advantages of AI over traditional methods, discuss potential limitations, and propose pathways to overcome them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-17T15:01:33Z) - AIGS: Generating Science from AI-Powered Automated Falsification [17.50867181053229]
We propose Baby-AIGS as a baby-step demonstration of a full-process AIGS system, which is a multi-agent system with agents in roles representing key research process.
Experiments on three tasks preliminarily show that Baby-AIGS could produce meaningful scientific discoveries, though not on par with experienced human researchers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-17T13:40:35Z) - SciAgents: Automating scientific discovery through multi-agent intelligent graph reasoning [0.0]
A key challenge in artificial intelligence is the creation of systems capable of autonomously advancing scientific understanding.
We present SciAgents, an approach that leverages three core concepts.
The framework autonomously generates and refines research hypotheses, elucidating underlying mechanisms, design principles, and unexpected material properties.
Our case studies demonstrate scalable capabilities to combine generative AI, ontological representations, and multi-agent modeling, harnessing a swarm of intelligence' similar to biological systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-09T12:25:10Z) - BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments [112.25067497985447]
We introduce BioDiscoveryAgent, an agent that designs new experiments, reasons about their outcomes, and efficiently navigates the hypothesis space to reach desired solutions.<n>BioDiscoveryAgent can uniquely design new experiments without the need to train a machine learning model.<n>It achieves an average of 21% improvement in predicting relevant genetic perturbations across six datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-27T19:57:17Z) - Empowering Biomedical Discovery with AI Agents [15.125735219811268]
We envision "AI scientists" as systems capable of skeptical learning and reasoning.
Biomedical AI agents combine human creativity and expertise with AI's ability to analyze large datasets.
AI agents can impact areas ranging from virtual cell simulation, programmable control of phenotypes, and the design of cellular circuits to developing new therapies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-03T16:08:01Z) - A Neuro-mimetic Realization of the Common Model of Cognition via Hebbian
Learning and Free Energy Minimization [55.11642177631929]
Large neural generative models are capable of synthesizing semantically rich passages of text or producing complex images.
We discuss the COGnitive Neural GENerative system, such an architecture that casts the Common Model of Cognition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-14T23:28:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.