Asymmetric Dynamics of Partisan Warriors in YouTube Comments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21776v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 10:18:13 GMT
• Title: Asymmetric Dynamics of Partisan Warriors in YouTube Comments
• Abstract summary: Cross-cutting commenting on social media is often imagined as a path to deliberation, yet exposure to opposing views frequently fuels hostility.<n>We introduce the concept of partisan warriors--commenters who cross ideological lines primarily to launch uncivil attacks against out-partisans.
• Score: 1.0286925351756329
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Cross-cutting commenting on social media is often imagined as a path to deliberation, yet exposure to opposing views frequently fuels hostility. To explain this dynamic, we introduce the concept of partisan warriors--commenters who cross ideological lines primarily to launch uncivil attacks against out-partisans. We analyze a large corpus of YouTube comments (N= 1,854,320) surrounding the 2024 U.S. second presidential debate. After filtering for toxicity and active participation, we use large language models to identify attack targets and operationalize partisan warrior behavior. Our analysis highlights four dynamics. First, cross-cutting commenters do not exhibit greater civility than those who remain within their ideological camps (RQ1). Second, audience reactions diverge by ideology: conservative audiences tended to reward hostile attacks on out-group leaders, whereas liberal audiences offered no comparable incentives and at times penalized such attacks (RQ2). Third, partisan warriors are notably more prevalent in conservative-leaning channels than in liberal ones; commenters restricted to conservative spaces were substantially more likely to engage in partisan warrior behavior compared to their liberal-only counterparts (RQ3). Finally, regarding environmental triggers, robustness checks suggest that this participation is an ecological phenomenon driven largely by channel-level heterogeneity rather than transient responses to individual video titles (RQ4). By shifting attention from the prevalence of incivility to its targets, rewards, and structural drivers, this study advances understanding of how partisan hostility is enacted and sustained in online spaces.

Related papers

• Synthetic Contact with AI Reduces Cross-Partisan Animosity [0.0]
  Americans' warmth toward members of the opposing political party has fallen sharply over the past three decades.<n>We test whether brief conversations with AI chatbots representing the political outgroup can substitute for the contact people shun.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-02T13:51:57Z)
• Auditing Algorithmic Personalization in TikTok Comment Sections [4.784448295763737]
  We trained sock-puppet accounts to exhibit left-leaning or right-leaning preferences and validated 17 of them by analyzing the videos recommended on their For You Pages.<n>We then scraped the comment sections shown to these trained partisan accounts, along with five cold-start accounts, across 65 politically neutral videos.<n>We find that while the composition of top comments remains largely consistent for all videos, ranking divergence between accounts from different political groups is significantly greater than that observed within the same group for some videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T05:52:41Z)
• The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
  We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries.<n>We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z)
• Collective moderation of hate, toxicity, and extremity in online discussions [1.114199733551736]
  We analyze a large corpus of more than 130,000 discussions on Twitter over four years. We identify different dimensions of discourse that might be related to the probability of hate speech in subsequent tweets. We find that expressing simple opinions, not necessarily supported by facts, relates to the least hate in subsequent discussions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T09:35:26Z)
• Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
  We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years. We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z)
• Demographic Confounding Causes Extreme Instances of Lifestyle Politics on Facebook [73.37786708074361]
  We find that the most extreme instances of lifestyle politics are those which are highly confounded by demographics such as race/ethnicity. The most liberal interests included electric cars, Planned Parenthood, and liberal satire while the most conservative interests included the Republican Party and conservative commentators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-17T16:48:00Z)
• Dynamic Emotions of Supporters and Opponents of Anti-racism Movement from George Floyd Protests [4.628652869726037]
  This study attempts to empirically examine a recent anti-racism movement initiated by the death of George Floyd with the lens of stance prediction and aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) First, this study found the stance of the tweet and users do change over the course of the protest. Furthermore, there are more users who shifted the stance compared to those who maintained the stance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T08:27:30Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Cross-Partisan Discussions on YouTube: Conservatives Talk to Liberals but Liberals Don't Talk to Conservatives [9.797488793708625]
  We find a surprising amount of cross-talk: most users with at least 10 comments posted at least once on both left-leaning and right-leaning YouTube channels. Conservatives were much more likely to comment on left-leaning videos than liberals on right-leaning videos. Cross-partisan replies were more toxic than co-partisan replies on both left-leaning and right-leaning videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T11:32:37Z)
• How do climate change skeptics engage with opposing views? Understanding mechanisms of social identity and cognitive dissonance in an online forum [0.0]
  We study the impact of opposing views within a major climate change skeptic online community on Reddit. We find that ideologically dissonant submissions act as a stimulant to activity in the community. Users who engaged with dissonant submissions were also more likely to return to the forum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T13:39:00Z)
• Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to misinformation [71.46564239895892]
  We analyze the relationship between partisanship, echo chambers, and vulnerability to online misinformation by studying news sharing behavior on Twitter. We find that vulnerability to misinformation is most strongly influenced by partisanship for both left- and right-leaning users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T01:36:14Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.