LLMON: An LLM-native Markup Language to Leverage Structure and Semantics at the LLM Interface

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22519v2
• Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 20:39:09 GMT
• Title: LLMON: An LLM-native Markup Language to Leverage Structure and Semantics at the LLM Interface
• Abstract summary: We introduce an LLM-native mark-up language, LLMON, that enables the structure and semantic metadata of the text to be communicated in a natural way to an LLM.<n>This information can then be used during model training, model prompting, and inference implementation, leading to improvements in model accuracy, safety, and security.
• Score: 6.499636351596393
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Textual Large Language Models (LLMs) provide a simple and familiar interface: a string of text is used for both input and output. However, the information conveyed to an LLM often has a richer structure and semantics, which is not conveyed in a string. For example, most prompts contain both instructions ("Summarize this paper into a paragraph") and data (the paper to summarize), but these are usually not distinguished when passed to the model. This can lead to model confusion and security risks, such as prompt injection attacks. This work addresses this shortcoming by introducing an LLM-native mark-up language, LLMON (LLM Object Notation, pronounced "Lemon"), that enables the structure and semantic metadata of the text to be communicated in a natural way to an LLM. This information can then be used during model training, model prompting, and inference implementation, leading to improvements in model accuracy, safety, and security. This is analogous to how programming language types can be used for many purposes, such as static checking, code generation, dynamic checking, and IDE highlighting. We discuss the general design requirements of an LLM-native markup language, introduce the LLMON markup language and show how it meets these design requirements, describe how the information contained in a LLMON artifact can benefit model training and inference implementation, and provide some preliminary empirical evidence of its value for both of these use cases. We also discuss broader issues and research opportunities that are enabled with an LLM-native approach.

Related papers

• A Language for Describing Agentic LLM Contexts [24.406399255415113]
  Agentic Context Description Language (ACDL) provides constructs for specifying context aspects.<n>ACDL diagrams can be hand drawn on a whiteboard, or written in formal language which can then be rendered.<n>Tooling, examples and documentation are available at www.acdlang.org.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-03T15:02:44Z)
• Type-Constrained Code Generation with Language Models [51.03439021895432]
  We introduce a type-constrained decoding approach that leverages type systems to guide code generation.<n>For this purpose, we develop novel prefix automata and a search over inhabitable types, forming a sound approach to enforce well-typedness on LLM-generated code.<n>Our approach reduces compilation errors by more than half and significantly increases functional correctness in code synthesis, translation, and repair tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T15:03:00Z)
• Leveraging the Power of MLLMs for Gloss-Free Sign Language Translation [14.817951264354022]
  Sign language translation (SLT) is a challenging task that involves translating sign language images into spoken language.<n>We propose a novel gloss-free framework called Multimodal Sign Language Translation (MMSLT)<n>Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets PHOENIX14T and CSL-Daily.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T09:01:41Z)
• Large Language Models are Interpretable Learners [53.56735770834617]
  In this paper, we show a combination of Large Language Models (LLMs) and symbolic programs can bridge the gap between expressiveness and interpretability. The pretrained LLM with natural language prompts provides a massive set of interpretable modules that can transform raw input into natural language concepts. As the knowledge learned by LSP is a combination of natural language descriptions and symbolic rules, it is easily transferable to humans (interpretable) and other LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T02:18:15Z)
• Text-like Encoding of Collaborative Information in Large Language Models for Recommendation [58.87865271693269]
  We introduce BinLLM, a novel method to seamlessly integrate collaborative information with Large Language Models for Recommendation (LLMRec) BinLLM converts collaborative embeddings from external models into binary sequences. BinLLM provides options to compress the binary sequence using dot-decimal notation to avoid excessively long lengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T12:45:25Z)
• CodecLM: Aligning Language Models with Tailored Synthetic Data [51.59223474427153]
  We introduce CodecLM, a framework for adaptively generating high-quality synthetic data for instruction-following abilities. We first encode seed instructions into metadata, which are concise keywords generated on-the-fly to capture the target instruction distribution. We also introduce Self-Rubrics and Contrastive Filtering during decoding to tailor data-efficient samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T21:15:36Z)
• Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Survey [49.8318827245266]
  This survey focuses on the utility of Large Language Models for data annotation and synthesis.<n>It includes an in-depth taxonomy of data types that LLMs can annotate, a review of learning strategies for models utilizing LLM-generated annotations, and a detailed discussion of the primary challenges and limitations associated with using LLMs for data annotation and synthesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T00:44:04Z)
• Learning to Prompt with Text Only Supervision for Vision-Language Models [107.282881515667]
  One branch of methods adapts CLIP by learning prompts using visual information. An alternative approach resorts to training-free methods by generating class descriptions from large language models. We propose to combine the strengths of both streams by learning prompts using only text data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T18:59:49Z)
• If LLM Is the Wizard, Then Code Is the Wand: A Survey on How Code Empowers Large Language Models to Serve as Intelligent Agents [81.60906807941188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on a combination of natural language and formal language (code) Code translates high-level goals into executable steps, featuring standard syntax, logical consistency, abstraction, and modularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T16:51:20Z)
• Making Large Language Models A Better Foundation For Dense Retrieval [19.38740248464456]
  Dense retrieval needs to learn discriminative text embeddings to represent the semantic relationship between query and document. It may benefit from the using of large language models (LLMs), given LLMs' strong capability on semantic understanding. We propose LLaRA (LLM adapted for dense RetrievAl), which works as a post-hoc adaptation of dense retrieval application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-24T15:10:35Z)
• Bridging Code Semantic and LLMs: Semantic Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Code Generation [22.219645213202178]
  This paper proposes the "Semantic Chain-of-Thought" approach to intruduce semantic information of code, named SeCoT. We show that SeCoT can achieves state-of-the-art performance, greatly improving the potential for large models and code generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T05:09:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.