Empirical Comparison of Agent Communication Protocols for Task Orchestration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22823v2
• Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 06:47:52 GMT
• Title: Empirical Comparison of Agent Communication Protocols for Task Orchestration
• Abstract summary: Two competing communication protocols have emerged: a tool integration protocol that standardizes how agents invoke external tools, and an inter-agent delegation protocol that enables autonomous agents to discover and delegate tasks to one another.<n>The goal of this work is to develop the first systematic benchmark comparing tool-integration-only, multi-agent delegation, and hybrid architectures across standardized queries at three complexity levels.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Context. Nowadays, artificial intelligence agent systems are transforming from single-tool interactions to complex multi-agent orchestrations. As a result, two competing communication protocols have emerged: a tool integration protocol that standardizes how agents invoke external tools, and an inter-agent delegation protocol that enables autonomous agents to discover and delegate tasks to one another. Despite widespread industry adoption by dozens of enterprise partners, no empirical comparison of these protocols exists in the literature. Objective. The goal of this work is to develop the first systematic benchmark comparing tool-integration-only, multi-agent delegation, and hybrid architectures across standardized queries at three complexity levels, and to quantify the trade-offs in response time, context window consumption, monetary cost, error recovery, and implementation complexity.

Related papers

• A Technical Taxonomy of LLM Agent Communication Protocols [60.76747983053368]
  This study develops a technical taxonomy to classify and analyze large language models (LLMs) agent communication protocols.<n>The framework guides protocol selection and highlights open research gaps such as privacy and policy enforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T14:45:20Z)
• SynAgent: Generalizable Cooperative Humanoid Manipulation via Solo-to-Cooperative Agent Synergy [59.86199649493784]
  Controllable cooperative humanoid manipulation is a fundamental yet challenging problem for embodied intelligence.<n>We present SynAgent, a framework that enables scalable and physically plausible cooperative manipulation.<n>In experiments, SynAgent significantly outperforms existing baselines in both cooperative imitation and trajectory-conditioned control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T17:46:20Z)
• Small Model as Master Orchestrator: Learning Unified Agent-Tool Orchestration with Parallel Subtask Decomposition [61.291733522717415]
  Agent-as-Tool is a unified parallel orchestration paradigm that mitigates both agents and tools into a standardized, learnable action space.<n>ParaManager decouples planning decisions from subtask solving, enabling state-aware parallel subtask decomposition, delegation, and asynchronous execution.<n>Experiments show that ParaManager achieves strong performance across multiple benchmarks and exhibits robust generalization under unseen model pools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-18T14:41:27Z)
• AgentMaster: A Multi-Agent Conversational Framework Using A2A and MCP Protocols for Multimodal Information Retrieval and Analysis [0.0]
  We present a pilot study of AgentMaster, a novel modular multi-protocol MAS framework with self-implemented A2A and MCP.<n>The system supports natural language interaction without prior technical expertise and responds to multimodal queries for tasks including information retrieval, question answering, and image analysis.<n>Overall, our proposed framework contributes to the potential capabilities of domain-specific, cooperative, and scalable conversational AI powered by MAS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T03:34:26Z)
• AnyMAC: Cascading Flexible Multi-Agent Collaboration via Next-Agent Prediction [77.62279834617475]
  We propose a new framework that rethinks multi-agent coordination through a sequential structure rather than a graph structure.<n>Our method focuses on two key directions: (1) Next-Agent Prediction, which selects the most suitable agent role at each step, and (2) Next-Context Selection, which enables each agent to selectively access relevant information from any previous step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-21T18:34:43Z)
• AgentOrchestra: Orchestrating Hierarchical Multi-Agent Intelligence with the Tool-Environment-Agent(TEA) Protocol [22.406849007798858]
  We propose the Tool-Environment-Agent Protocol to integrate environments, agents, and tools into an unified system.<n>We introduce AgentOrchestra, a hierarchical multi-agent framework with a central planning agent that decomposes complex objectives and coordinates specialized agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T13:45:37Z)
• Agent Context Protocols Enhance Collective Inference [25.611935537078825]
  Agent context protocols (ACPs) are a domain- and agent-agnostic family of structured protocols for agent-agent communication, coordination, and error handling.<n>ACPs combine persistent execution blueprints and standardized message schemas, enabling robust and fault-tolerant collective inference.<n>ACP-powered generalist systems reach state-of-the-art performance: 28.3 % accuracy on AssistantBench for long-horizon web assistance and best-in-class multimodal technical reports.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T16:28:08Z)
• A Survey of AI Agent Protocols [35.431057321412354]
  There is no standard way for large language models (LLMs) agents to communicate with external tools or data sources.<n>This lack of standardized protocols makes it difficult for agents to work together or scale effectively.<n>A unified communication protocol for LLM agents could change this.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T14:07:26Z)
• MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents [59.825725526176655]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as autonomous agents.<n>Existing benchmarks either focus on single-agent tasks or are confined to narrow domains, failing to capture the dynamics of multi-agent coordination and competition.<n>We introduce MultiAgentBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLM-based multi-agent systems across diverse, interactive scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T05:18:50Z)
• Towards Effective GenAI Multi-Agent Collaboration: Design and Evaluation for Enterprise Applications [15.480315462362531]
  This report presents a comprehensive evaluation of coordination and routing capabilities in a novel multi-agent collaboration framework.<n>For coordination capabilities, we demonstrate the effectiveness of inter-agent communication and payload referencing mechanisms, achieving end-to-end goal success rates of 90%.<n>Our analysis yields several key findings: multi-agent collaboration enhances goal success rates by up to 70% compared to single-agent approaches in our benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T22:14:17Z)
• Internet of Agents: Weaving a Web of Heterogeneous Agents for Collaborative Intelligence [79.5316642687565]
  Existing multi-agent frameworks often struggle with integrating diverse capable third-party agents. We propose the Internet of Agents (IoA), a novel framework that addresses these limitations. IoA introduces an agent integration protocol, an instant-messaging-like architecture design, and dynamic mechanisms for agent teaming and conversation flow control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T17:33:24Z)
• Learning to Use Tools via Cooperative and Interactive Agents [58.77710337157665]
  Tool learning empowers large language models (LLMs) as agents to use external tools and extend their utility. We propose ConAgents, a Cooperative and interactive Agents framework, which coordinates three specialized agents for tool selection, tool execution, and action calibration separately. Our experiments on three datasets show that the LLMs, when equipped with ConAgents, outperform baselines with substantial improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T15:08:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.