Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Knowledge Gap: Toward a New Form of Informational Inequality

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24335v1
• Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 14:15:11 GMT
• Title: Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Knowledge Gap: Toward a New Form of Informational Inequality
• Abstract summary: The knowledge gap hypothesis suggests that the diffusion of information tends to increase rather than reduce social inequalities.<n>The emergence of generative artificial intelligence raises the question of whether these frameworks remain sufficient to describe current forms of informational inequality.<n>This paper proposes a theoretical extension of the knowledge gap perspective by arguing that generative AI shifts the focus from access and usage to the critical evaluation of information.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The knowledge gap hypothesis suggests that the diffusion of information tends to increase rather than reduce social inequalities. Subsequent research on the digital divide has extended this perspective by focusing on unequal access to and use of digital technologies. The emergence of generative artificial intelligence raises the question of whether these frameworks remain sufficient to describe current forms of informational inequality. While access to AI systems is increasingly widespread, differences may arise in how users engage with AI-generated content. This paper proposes a theoretical extension of the knowledge gap perspective by arguing that generative AI shifts the focus from access and usage to the critical evaluation of information. It is assumed that individuals with higher levels of education are more likely to question and contextualize AI-generated outputs, whereas individuals with lower levels of education may rely more directly on them. The contribution is conceptual and does not present empirical findings. It aims to provide a framework for future research on the relationship between education, AI use, and knowledge inequality.

Related papers

• Neural-Symbolic Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs: A Survey from a Query Perspective [55.79507207292647]
  Knowledge graph reasoning is pivotal in various domains such as data mining, artificial intelligence, the Web, and social sciences.<n>The rise of Neural AI marks a significant advancement, merging the robustness of deep learning with the precision of symbolic reasoning.<n>The advent of large language models (LLMs) has opened new frontiers in knowledge graph reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-30T18:54:08Z)
• Perceptions of Discriminatory Decisions of Artificial Intelligence: Unpacking the Role of Individual Characteristics [0.0]
  Personal differences (digital self-efficacy, technical knowledge, belief in equality, political ideology) are associated with perceptions of AI outcomes. Digital self-efficacy and technical knowledge are positively associated with attitudes toward AI. Liberal ideologies are negatively associated with outcome trust, higher negative emotion, and greater skepticism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T06:18:26Z)
• Not a Swiss Army Knife: Academics' Perceptions of Trade-Offs Around Generative Artificial Intelligence Use [12.85888736626468]
  We interviewed 17 knowledge workers, including faculty and students, to investigate the social and technical dimensions of generative AI (Gen AI)<n>Our participants raised concerns about the opacity of the data used to train Gen AI.<n>Participants recognized Gen AI's potential to democratize knowledge by accelerating the learning process and act as an accessible research assistant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T04:25:35Z)
• AI and the Problem of Knowledge Collapse [0.0]
  We identify conditions under which AI, by reducing the cost of access to certain modes of knowledge, can paradoxically harm public understanding. We provide a simple model in which a community of learners or innovators choose to use traditional methods or to rely on a discounted AI-assisted process. In our default model, a 20% discount on AI-generated content generates public beliefs 2.3 times further from the truth than when there is no discount.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T15:06:23Z)
• The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making [1.5156317247732694]
  Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access, but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T10:37:22Z)
• FATE in AI: Towards Algorithmic Inclusivity and Accessibility [0.0]
  To prevent algorithmic disparities, fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (FATE) in AI are being implemented. This study examines FATE-related desiderata, particularly transparency and ethics, in areas of the global South that are underserved by AI. To promote inclusivity, a community-led strategy is proposed to collect and curate representative data for responsible AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-03T15:08:10Z)
• Towards Human Cognition Level-based Experiment Design for Counterfactual Explanations (XAI) [68.8204255655161]
  The emphasis of XAI research appears to have turned to a more pragmatic explanation approach for better understanding. An extensive area where cognitive science research may substantially influence XAI advancements is evaluating user knowledge and feedback. We propose a framework to experiment with generating and evaluating the explanations on the grounds of different cognitive levels of understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T19:20:22Z)
• Adaptive cognitive fit: Artificial intelligence augmented management of information facets and representations [62.997667081978825]
  Explosive growth in big data technologies and artificial intelligence [AI] applications have led to increasing pervasiveness of information facets. Information facets, such as equivocality and veracity, can dominate and significantly influence human perceptions of information. We suggest that artificially intelligent technologies that can adapt information representations to overcome cognitive limitations are necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-25T02:47:25Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Personalized Education in the AI Era: What to Expect Next? [76.37000521334585]
  The objective of personalized learning is to design an effective knowledge acquisition track that matches the learner's strengths and bypasses her weaknesses to meet her desired goal. In recent years, the boost of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has unfolded novel perspectives to enhance personalized education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T12:23:32Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.