Not a fragment, but the whole: Map-based evaluation of data-driven Fire Danger Index models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25469v1
• Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 14:11:44 GMT
• Title: Not a fragment, but the whole: Map-based evaluation of data-driven Fire Danger Index models
• Abstract summary: A growing body of literature has focused on predicting wildfire occurrence using machine learning methods.<n>We propose a novel method for evaluating a forest fire forecasting model that is aligned with real-world decision-making.
• Score: 0.34410212782758043
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: A growing body of literature has focused on predicting wildfire occurrence using machine learning methods, capitalizing on high-resolution data and fire predictors that canonical process-based frameworks largely ignore. Standard evaluation metrics for an ML classifier, while important, provide a potentially limited measure of the model's operational performance for the Fire Danger Index (FDI) forecast. Furthermore, model evaluation is frequently conducted without adequately accounting for false positive rates, despite their critical relevance in operational contexts. In this paper, we revisit the daily FDI model evaluation paradigm and propose a novel method for evaluating a forest fire forecasting model that is aligned with real-world decision-making. Furthermore, we systematically assess performance in accurately predicting fire activity and the false positives (false alarms). We further demonstrate that an ensemble of ML models improves both fire identification and reduces false positives.

Related papers

• The Tail Tells All: Estimating Model-Level Membership Inference Vulnerability Without Reference Models [8.453525669833853]
  We present a novel approach for estimating model-level vulnerability, the TPR at low FPR, to membership inference attacks without requiring reference models.<n>We show our method to outperform both low-cost (few reference models) attacks such as RMIA and other measures of distribution difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T17:03:55Z)
• Reference-Specific Unlearning Metrics Can Hide the Truth: A Reality Check [60.77691669644931]
  We propose Functional Alignment for Distributional Equivalence (FADE), a novel metric that measures distributional similarity between unlearned and reference models.<n>We show that FADE captures functional alignment across the entire output distribution, providing a principled assessment of genuine unlearning.<n>These findings expose fundamental gaps in current evaluation practices and demonstrate that FADE provides a more robust foundation for developing and assessing truly effective unlearning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T20:50:30Z)
• A Probabilistic Perspective on Unlearning and Alignment for Large Language Models [48.96686419141881]
  We introduce the first formal probabilistic evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n> Namely, we propose novel metrics with high probability guarantees concerning the output distribution of a model.<n>Our metrics are application-independent and allow practitioners to make more reliable estimates about model capabilities before deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T15:44:23Z)
• Prescribed Fire Modeling using Knowledge-Guided Machine Learning for Land Management [2.158876211806538]
  This paper introduces a novel machine learning (ML) framework that enables rapid emulation of prescribed fires. By incorporating domain knowledge, the proposed method helps reduce physical inconsistencies in fuel density estimates in data-scarce scenarios. We also overcome the problem of biased estimation of fire spread metrics by incorporating a hierarchical modeling structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T19:38:04Z)
• Rigorous Assessment of Model Inference Accuracy using Language Cardinality [5.584832154027001]
  We develop a systematic approach that minimizes bias and uncertainty in model accuracy assessment by replacing statistical estimation with deterministic accuracy measures. We experimentally demonstrate the consistency and applicability of our approach by assessing the accuracy of models inferred by state-of-the-art inference tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T21:03:26Z)
• Exploring validation metrics for offline model-based optimisation with diffusion models [50.404829846182764]
  In model-based optimisation (MBO) we are interested in using machine learning to design candidates that maximise some measure of reward with respect to a black box function called the (ground truth) oracle. While an approximation to the ground oracle can be trained and used in place of it during model validation to measure the mean reward over generated candidates, the evaluation is approximate and vulnerable to adversarial examples. This is encapsulated under our proposed evaluation framework which is also designed to measure extrapolation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-19T16:57:37Z)
• The Implicit Delta Method [61.36121543728134]
  In this paper, we propose an alternative, the implicit delta method, which works by infinitesimally regularizing the training loss of uncertainty. We show that the change in the evaluation due to regularization is consistent for the variance of the evaluation estimator, even when the infinitesimal change is approximated by a finite difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T19:34:17Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Firearm Detection via Convolutional Neural Networks: Comparing a Semantic Segmentation Model Against End-to-End Solutions [68.8204255655161]
  Threat detection of weapons and aggressive behavior from live video can be used for rapid detection and prevention of potentially deadly incidents. One way for achieving this is through the use of artificial intelligence and, in particular, machine learning for image analysis. We compare a traditional monolithic end-to-end deep learning model and a previously proposed model based on an ensemble of simpler neural networks detecting fire-weapons via semantic segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-17T15:19:29Z)
• A Zero-Shot based Fingerprint Presentation Attack Detection System [8.676298469169174]
  We propose a novel Zero-Shot Presentation Attack Detection Model to guarantee the generalization of the PAD model. The proposed ZSPAD-Model based on generative model does not utilize any negative samples in the process of establishment. In order to improve the performance of the proposed model, 9 confidence scores are discussed in this article.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-12T10:52:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.