A Graph Neural Network Approach for Solving the Ranked Assignment Problem in Multi-Object Tracking
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01696v1
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 06:54:47 GMT
- Title: A Graph Neural Network Approach for Solving the Ranked Assignment Problem in Multi-Object Tracking
- Abstract summary: Associating measurements with tracks is a crucial step in Multi-Object Tracking (MOT) to guarantee the safety of autonomous vehicles.<n>This paper addresses the ranked assignment problem arising from data association tasks with an approach that employs Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)<n>The proposed Ranked Assignment Prediction Graph Neural Network (RAPNet) uses bipartite graphs to model the problem, harnessing the computational capabilities of deep learning.<n>The conclusive evaluation compares the RAPNet with Murty's algorithm and the Gibbs sampler, showing accuracy improvements compared to the Gibbs sampler.
- Score: 2.059090414809122
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Associating measurements with tracks is a crucial step in Multi-Object Tracking (MOT) to guarantee the safety of autonomous vehicles. To manage the exponentially growing number of track hypotheses, truncation becomes necessary. In the $δ$-Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli ($δ$-GLMB) filter application, this truncation typically involves the ranked assignment problem, solved by Murty's algorithm or the Gibbs sampling approach, both with limitations in terms of complexity or accuracy, respectively. With the motivation to improve these limitations, this paper addresses the ranked assignment problem arising from data association tasks with an approach that employs Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). The proposed Ranked Assignment Prediction Graph Neural Network (RAPNet) uses bipartite graphs to model the problem, harnessing the computational capabilities of deep learning. The conclusive evaluation compares the RAPNet with Murty's algorithm and the Gibbs sampler, showing accuracy improvements compared to the Gibbs sampler.
Related papers
- Graph Convolutional Branch and Bound [1.8966938152549224]
We propose using neural networks to learn informatives-most notably, an optimality score that estimates a solution's proximity to the optimum.<n>This score is used to evaluate nodes within a branch-and-bound framework, enabling a more efficient of the solution space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T09:42:43Z) - Subgraph Matching via Query-Conditioned Subgraph Matching Neural
Networks and Bi-Level Tree Search [33.9052190473029]
Subgraph Matching is a core operation in graph database search, biomedical analysis, social group finding, etc.
In this paper, we propose a novel encoder-decoder neural network architecture to dynamically compute the matching information between the query and the target graphs.
Experiments on five large real-world target graphs show that N-BLS can significantly improve the subgraph matching performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-21T04:47:21Z) - RU-Net: Regularized Unrolling Network for Scene Graph Generation [92.95032610978511]
Scene graph generation (SGG) aims to detect objects and predict the relationships between each pair of objects.
Existing SGG methods usually suffer from several issues, including 1) ambiguous object representations, and 2) low diversity in relationship predictions.
We propose a regularized unrolling network (RU-Net) to address both problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-03T04:21:15Z) - Training Free Graph Neural Networks for Graph Matching [103.45755859119035]
TFGM is a framework to boost the performance of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) based graph matching without training.
Applying TFGM on various GNNs shows promising improvements over baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-14T09:04:46Z) - GLAN: A Graph-based Linear Assignment Network [29.788755291070462]
We propose a learnable linear assignment solver based on deep graph networks.
The experimental results on a synthetic dataset reveal that our method outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
We also embed the proposed solver into a popular multi-object tracking (MOT) framework to train the tracker in an end-to-end manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-05T13:18:02Z) - Mean-field Analysis of Piecewise Linear Solutions for Wide ReLU Networks [83.58049517083138]
We consider a two-layer ReLU network trained via gradient descent.
We show that SGD is biased towards a simple solution.
We also provide empirical evidence that knots at locations distinct from the data points might occur.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-03T15:14:20Z) - Learnable Graph Matching: Incorporating Graph Partitioning with Deep
Feature Learning for Multiple Object Tracking [58.30147362745852]
Data association across frames is at the core of Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) task.
Existing methods mostly ignore the context information among tracklets and intra-frame detections.
We propose a novel learnable graph matching method to address these issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-30T08:58:45Z) - A Biased Graph Neural Network Sampler with Near-Optimal Regret [57.70126763759996]
Graph neural networks (GNN) have emerged as a vehicle for applying deep network architectures to graph and relational data.
In this paper, we build upon existing work and treat GNN neighbor sampling as a multi-armed bandit problem.
We introduce a newly-designed reward function that introduces some degree of bias designed to reduce variance and avoid unstable, possibly-unbounded payouts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-01T15:55:58Z) - Alleviating the Inconsistency Problem of Applying Graph Neural Network
to Fraud Detection [78.88163190021798]
We introduce a new GNN framework, $mathsfGraphConsis$, to tackle the inconsistency problem.
Empirical analysis on four datasets indicates the inconsistency problem is crucial in a fraud detection task.
We also released a GNN-based fraud detection toolbox with implementations of SOTA models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-01T21:43:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.