Noisy Nonreciprocal Pairwise Comparisons: Scale Variation, Noise Calibration, and Admissible Ranking Regions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04588v1
• Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2026 10:50:16 GMT
• Title: Noisy Nonreciprocal Pairwise Comparisons: Scale Variation, Noise Calibration, and Admissible Ranking Regions
• Abstract summary: We introduce an additive model in which the unknown underlying comparison matrix is consistent but not necessarily reciprocal.<n>We show how to estimate the noise level, assess whether the scale variation remains moderate, and assign probabilities to ranking regions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Pairwise comparisons are widely used in decision analysis, preference modeling, and evaluation problems. In many practical situations, the observed comparison matrix is not reciprocal. This lack of reciprocity is often treated as a defect to be corrected immediately. In this article, we adopt a different point of view: part of the nonreciprocity may reflect a genuine variation in the evaluation scale, while another part is due to random perturbations. We introduce an additive model in which the unknown underlying comparison matrix is consistent but not necessarily reciprocal. The reciprocal component carries the global ranking information, whereas the symmetric component describes possible scale variation. Around this structured matrix, we add a random perturbation and show how to estimate the noise level, assess whether the scale variation remains moderate, and assign probabilities to admissible ranking regions in the sense of strict ranking by pairwise comparisons. We also compare this approach with the brutal projection onto reciprocal matrices, which suppresses all symmetric information at once. The Gaussian perturbation model is used here not because human decisions are exactly Gaussian, but because observed judgment errors often result from the accumulation of many small effects. In such a context, the central limit principle provides a natural heuristic justification for Gaussian noise. This makes it possible to derive explicit estimators and probability assessments while keeping the model interpretable for decision problems.

Related papers

• Beyond Consistency: Inference for the Relative risk functional in Deep Nonparametric Cox Models [7.2275111013288535]
  It is unclear how Cox-based optimization error propagates to population risk under partial likelihood.<n>It is also unclear how pointwise bias can be controlled, and how ensemble-based uncertainty behaves under realistic variance regimes.<n>We develop an distribution theory for deep Cox estimators that addresses these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-25T01:43:12Z)
• Noise Titration: Exact Distributional Benchmarking for Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting [1.5939955861266883]
  We propose a paradigm shift toward interventionist, exact-statistical benchmarking.<n>We transform forecasting from a black-box sequence matching game into an exact distributional inference task.<n>We find that state-of-the-art zero-shot models behave consistently with the context-parroting mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T17:14:11Z)
• On Uncertainty Calibration for Equivariant Functions [11.063402372161859]
  We present a theory relating equivariance to uncertainty estimation.<n>We show how symmetry mismatch can result in miscalibration in both classification and regression.<n>We complement our theoretical framework with numerical experiments that clarify the relationship between equivariance and uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T17:50:41Z)
• On Equivariant Model Selection through the Lens of Uncertainty [49.137341292207]
  Equivariant models leverage prior knowledge on symmetries to improve predictive performance, but misspecified architectural constraints can harm it instead.<n>We compare frequentist (via Conformal Prediction), Bayesian (via the marginal likelihood), and calibration-based measures to naive error-based evaluation.<n>We find that uncertainty metrics generally align with predictive performance, but Bayesian model evidence does so inconsistently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T13:35:06Z)
• Benign Overfitting and the Geometry of the Ridge Regression Solution in Binary Classification [75.01389991485098]
  We show that ridge regression has qualitatively different behavior depending on the scale of the cluster mean vector.<n>In regimes where the scale is very large, the conditions that allow for benign overfitting turn out to be the same as those for the regression task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T01:45:42Z)
• Multivariate root-n-consistent smoothing parameter free matching estimators and estimators of inverse density weighted expectations [51.000851088730684]
  We develop novel modifications of nearest-neighbor and matching estimators which converge at the parametric $sqrt n $-rate.<n>We stress that our estimators do not involve nonparametric function estimators and in particular do not rely on sample-size dependent parameters smoothing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T13:28:34Z)
• Learning a Gaussian Mixture for Sparsity Regularization in Inverse Problems [2.174919458782602]
  In inverse problems, the incorporation of a sparsity prior yields a regularization effect on the solution.<n>We propose a probabilistic sparsity prior formulated as a mixture of Gaussians, capable of modeling sparsity with respect to a generic basis.<n>We put forth both a supervised and an unsupervised training strategy to estimate the parameters of this network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T22:52:57Z)
• The Optimal Noise in Noise-Contrastive Learning Is Not What You Think [80.07065346699005]
  We show that deviating from this assumption can actually lead to better statistical estimators. In particular, the optimal noise distribution is different from the data's and even from a different family.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-02T13:59:20Z)
• Estimation of Bivariate Structural Causal Models by Variational Gaussian Process Regression Under Likelihoods Parametrised by Normalising Flows [74.85071867225533]
  Causal mechanisms can be described by structural causal models. One major drawback of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence is its lack of explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:52:58Z)
• Deconfounding Scores: Feature Representations for Causal Effect Estimation with Weak Overlap [140.98628848491146]
  We introduce deconfounding scores, which induce better overlap without biasing the target of estimation. We show that deconfounding scores satisfy a zero-covariance condition that is identifiable in observed data. In particular, we show that this technique could be an attractive alternative to standard regularizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T18:50:11Z)
• Understanding Double Descent Requires a Fine-Grained Bias-Variance Decomposition [34.235007566913396]
  We describe an interpretable, symmetric decomposition of the variance into terms associated with the labels. We find that the bias decreases monotonically with the network width, but the variance terms exhibit non-monotonic behavior. We also analyze the strikingly rich phenomenology that arises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T21:04:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.