Benchmarking LLM Tool-Use in the Wild

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06185v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 08:55:46 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking LLM Tool-Use in the Wild
• Abstract summary: Real user interactions are inherently wild, being intricate, messy, and flexible.<n>We identify three key challenges from user behaviour: compositional tasks that demand efficient orchestration of tool-call topologies, implicit intent spread across dialogue turns, and instruction transition.<n>We introduce WildToolBench, an LLM tool-use benchmark grounded in real-world user behaviour patterns.
• Score: 10.664145474355445
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Fulfilling user needs through Large Language Model multi-turn, multi-step tool-use is rarely a straightforward process. Real user interactions are inherently wild, being intricate, messy, and flexible. We identify three key challenges from user behaviour: compositional tasks that demand efficient orchestration of tool-call topologies, implicit intent spread across dialogue turns that require contextual inference, and instruction transition, which mixes task queries, clarifications, and casual conversation, forcing LLMs to adjust their policies on the fly. Existing benchmarks overlook these behaviors, making the apparent progress of LLMs on tool-use spurious. To address this, we introduce WildToolBench, an LLM tool-use benchmark grounded in real-world user behavior patterns. Comprehensive evaluations of 57 LLMs reveal that no model achieves an accuracy of more than 15%, indicating a substantial gap in the robustness of LLMs' agentic ability. Controlled experiments and in-depth analyses further indicate that the real challenge for LLM tool-use lies not in artificially complex tasks, but in the wild nature of user behavior, emphasizing the need to reconsider the interactions among LLMs, users, and tools.

Related papers

• Gecko: A Simulation Environment with Stateful Feedback for Refining Agent Tool Calls [56.407063247662336]
  We introduce Gecko, a comprehensive environment that simulates tool responses using a combination of rules and LLMs.<n>GATS consistently improves the tool calling performance of various LLMs including GPT-4o, GPT-5, and Gemini-3.0-pro.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-22T15:02:00Z)
• Learning to Ask: When LLM Agents Meet Unclear Instruction [55.65312637965779]
  Large language models (LLMs) can leverage external tools for addressing a range of tasks unattainable through language skills alone.<n>We evaluate the performance of LLMs tool-use under imperfect instructions, analyze the error patterns, and build a challenging tool-use benchmark called Noisy ToolBench.<n>We propose a novel framework, Ask-when-Needed (AwN), which prompts LLMs to ask questions to users whenever they encounter obstacles due to unclear instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-31T23:06:12Z)
• GTA: A Benchmark for General Tool Agents [32.443456248222695]
  We design 229 real-world tasks and executable tool chains to evaluate mainstream large language models (LLMs) Our findings show that real-world user queries are challenging for existing LLMs, with GPT-4 completing less than 50% of the tasks and most LLMs achieving below 25%. This evaluation reveals the bottlenecks in the tool-use capabilities of current LLMs in real-world scenarios, which provides future direction for advancing general-purpose tool agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T17:50:09Z)
• Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More? [54.667202878390526]
  Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases. We introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning. Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T00:28:58Z)
• Tool Learning in the Wild: Empowering Language Models as Automatic Tool Agents [56.822238860147024]
  Augmenting large language models with external tools has emerged as a promising approach to extend their utility.<n>Previous methods manually parse tool documentation and create in-context demonstrations, transforming tools into structured formats for LLMs to use in their step-by-step reasoning.<n>We propose AutoTools, a framework that enables LLMs to automate the tool-use workflow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T11:40:58Z)
• PPTC-R benchmark: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models for PowerPoint Task Completion [96.47420221442397]
  We construct adversarial user instructions by attacking user instructions at sentence, semantic, and multi-language levels. We test 3 closed-source and 4 open-source LLMs using a benchmark that incorporates robustness settings. We find that GPT-4 exhibits the highest performance and strong robustness in our benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T15:33:32Z)
• Look Before You Leap: Towards Decision-Aware and Generalizable Tool-Usage for Large Language Models [26.28459880766842]
  We propose a decision-aware and generalizable tool-usage framework (DEER) Specifically, we first construct the tool-usage samples with multiple decision branches via an automatic generation pipeline. Our proposed DEER is effective and significantly outperforms baselines across various datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T16:11:03Z)
• User-LLM: Efficient LLM Contextualization with User Embeddings [23.226164112909643]
  User-LLM is a novel framework that leverages user embeddings to directly contextualize large language models with user history interactions. Our approach achieves significant efficiency gains by representing user timelines directly as embeddings, leading to substantial inference speedups of up to 78.1X.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:03:27Z)
• Small LLMs Are Weak Tool Learners: A Multi-LLM Agent [73.54562551341454]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents significantly extend the capabilities of standalone LLMs. We propose a novel approach that decomposes the aforementioned capabilities into a planner, caller, and summarizer. This modular framework facilitates individual updates and the potential use of smaller LLMs for building each capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-14T16:17:07Z)
• MINT: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-turn Interaction with Tools and Language Feedback [78.60644407028022]
  We introduce MINT, a benchmark that evaluates large language models' ability to solve tasks with multi-turn interactions. LLMs generally benefit from tools and language feedback, with performance gains of 1-8% for each turn of tool use. LLMs evaluated, supervised instruction-finetuning (SIFT) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) generally hurt multi-turn capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T15:25:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.