Automated Standardization of Legacy Biomedical Metadata Using an Ontology-Constrained LLM Agent
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08552v1
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 18:47:30 GMT
- Title: Automated Standardization of Legacy Biomedical Metadata Using an Ontology-Constrained LLM Agent
- Abstract summary: We present an automated standardization system for biomedical metadata.<n>The system queries authoritative terminology services in real time to retrieve canonically correct vocabulary terms on demand.<n>Our evaluation shows that augmenting the LLM with real-time tool access consistently improves prediction accuracy.
- Score: 0.1105171275481129
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Scientific metadata are often incomplete and noncompliant with community standards, limiting dataset findability, interoperability, and reuse. When reporting guidelines exist, they typically lack machine-actionable representations. Producing FAIR datasets requires encoding metadata standards as machine-actionable templates with rich field specifications and precise value constraints. Recent work has shown that LLMs guided by field names and ontology constraints can improve metadata standardization, but these approaches treat constraints as static text prompts, relying on the model's training knowledge alone. We present an LLM-based metadata standardization system that queries authoritative biomedical terminology services in real time to retrieve canonically correct vocabulary terms on demand. We evaluate this approach on 839 legacy metadata records from the Human BioMolecular Atlas Program (HuBMAP) using an expert-curated gold standard for exact-match assessment. Our evaluation shows that augmenting the LLM with real-time tool access consistently improves prediction accuracy over the LLM alone across both ontology-constrained and non-ontology-constrained fields, demonstrating a practical, scalable approach to automated standardization of biomedical metadata.
Related papers
- Who Needs Labels? Adapting Vision Foundation Models With the Metadata You Already Have [28.360344714913193]
We propose a label-free approach to adapt powerful but generic vision foundation models to specialized scientific domains.<n>Our method, FINO, combines a standard self-supervised objective with flexible metadata guidance.<n>It consistently outperforms standard unsupervised domain adaptation and fully supervised adaptation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-03T17:10:11Z) - Unlocking Biological Workflows for Robust Protein-Text Question Answering: A Dual-Dimensional RAG Framework [60.82334952881798]
Protein-Text Question Answering (QA) is crucial for interpreting biological sequences through natural language.<n>We propose 2D-ProteinRAG, a novel framework that empowers Large Language Models (LLMs) to operate within the gold-standard biological research workflow.<n>We show that 2D-Protein consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming fine-tuned baselines and other RAG methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-17T05:03:24Z) - STELLAR-E: a Synthetic, Tailored, End-to-end LLM Application Rigorous Evaluator [0.2093721226649358]
We present STELLAR-E - a fully automated system to generate high-quality synthetic datasets of custom size.<n>The synthetic datasets reach an average difference of +5.7% in terms of LLM-as-a-judge scores against existing language-specific benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-27T14:39:41Z) - Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMs [66.63911043019294]
Data preparation aims to denoise raw datasets, uncover cross-dataset relationships, and extract valuable insights from them.<n>This paper focuses on the use of LLM techniques to prepare data for diverse downstream tasks.<n>We introduce a task-centric taxonomy that organizes the field into three major tasks: data cleaning, standardization, error processing, imputation, data integration, and data enrichment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-22T12:02:45Z) - An Agentic Model Context Protocol Framework for Medical Concept Standardization [5.12407270785129]
We develop a zero-training, hallucination-preventive mapping system based on the Model Context Protocol (MCP)<n>The system enables explainable mapping and significantly improves efficiency and accuracy with minimal effort.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-04T02:32:22Z) - Data-efficient Meta-models for Evaluation of Context-based Questions and Answers in LLMs [1.6332728502735252]
Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are increasingly deployed in industry applications.<n>Their reliability remains hampered by challenges in detecting hallucinations.<n>This paper addresses the bottleneck of data annotation by investigating the feasibility of reducing training data requirements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T09:50:56Z) - Enhancing Domain-Specific Encoder Models with LLM-Generated Data: How to Leverage Ontologies, and How to Do Without Them [9.952432291248954]
We investigate the use of LLM-generated data for continual pretraining of encoder models in domains with limited data.<n>We compile a benchmark specifically designed for assessing embedding model performance in invasion biology.<n>Our results demonstrate that this approach achieves a fully automated pipeline for enhancing domain-specific understanding of small encoder models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T21:51:24Z) - Benchmarks as Microscopes: A Call for Model Metrology [76.64402390208576]
Modern language models (LMs) pose a new challenge in capability assessment.
To be confident in our metrics, we need a new discipline of model metrology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-22T17:52:12Z) - Utilising a Large Language Model to Annotate Subject Metadata: A Case
Study in an Australian National Research Data Catalogue [18.325675189960833]
In support of open and reproducible research, there has been a rapidly increasing number of datasets made available for research.
As the availability of datasets increases, it becomes more important to have quality metadata for discovering and reusing them.
This paper proposes to leverage large language models (LLMs) for cost-effective annotation of subject metadata through the LLM-based in-context learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-17T14:52:33Z) - Interpretable Medical Diagnostics with Structured Data Extraction by
Large Language Models [59.89454513692417]
Tabular data is often hidden in text, particularly in medical diagnostic reports.
We propose a novel, simple, and effective methodology for extracting structured tabular data from textual medical reports, called TEMED-LLM.
We demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art text classification models in medical diagnostics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T09:12:28Z) - An Iterative Optimizing Framework for Radiology Report Summarization with ChatGPT [80.33783969507458]
The 'Impression' section of a radiology report is a critical basis for communication between radiologists and other physicians.
Recent studies have achieved promising results in automatic impression generation using large-scale medical text data.
These models often require substantial amounts of medical text data and have poor generalization performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-17T17:13:42Z) - Metadata Representations for Queryable ML Model Zoos [73.24799582702326]
Machine learning (ML) practitioners and organizations are building model zoos of pre-trained models, containing metadata describing properties of the models.
The metatada is currently not standardised; its expressivity is limited; and there is no way to store and query it.
In this paper, we advocate for standardized ML model meta-data representation and management, proposing a toolkit supported to help practitioners manage and query that metadata.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-19T15:04:14Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.