From Plan to Action: How Well Do Agents Follow the Plan?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12147v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:54:55 GMT
• Title: From Plan to Action: How Well Do Agents Follow the Plan?
• Abstract summary: This paper presents the first systematic analysis of plan compliance in programming agents.<n>We examined 16,991 trajectories from SWE-agents across four LLMs on SWE-bench Verified and SWEbench Pro under eight plan variations.<n>A subpar plan hurts performance even more than no plan at all.
• Score: 6.54753809716901
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Agents aspire to eliminate the need for task-specific prompt crafting through autonomous reason-act-observe loops. Still, they are commonly instructed to follow a task-specific plan for guidance, e.g., to resolve software issues following phases for navigation, reproduction, patch, and validation. Unfortunately, it is unknown to what extent agents actually follow such instructed plans. Without such an analysis, determining the extent agents comply with a given plan, it is impossible to assess whether a solution was reached through correct strategic reasoning or through other means, e.g., data contamination or overfitting to a benchmark. This paper presents the first extensive, systematic analysis of plan compliance in programming agents, examining 16,991 trajectories from SWE-agent across four LLMs on SWE-bench Verified and SWE-bench Pro under eight plan variations. Without an explicit plan, agents fall back on workflows internalized during training, which are often incomplete, overfit, or inconsistently applied. Providing the standard plan improves issue resolution, and we observe that periodic plan reminders can mitigate plan violations and improve task success. A subpar plan hurts performance even more than no plan at all. Surprisingly, augmenting a plan with additional task-relevant phases in the early stage can degrade performance, particularly when these phases do not align with the model's internal problem-solving strategy. These findings highlight a research gap: fine-tuning paradigms that teach models to follow instructed plans, rather than encoding task-specific plans in them. This requires teaching models to reason and act adaptively, rather than memorizing workflows.

Related papers

• Does The Way You Plan Matter? An Empirical Study of Planning Representations for LLM Web Agents [43.297647791392144]
  We introduce PlanAhead, a framework that evaluates the impact of plan representation in agent performance.<n>We first categorize WebArena tasks into 3 difficulty levels, enabling consistent difficulty grading without human annotation.<n>We then systematically evaluate 4 different plan representations on the tasks categorized as hard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T13:39:49Z)
• PlanningBench: Generating Scalable and Verifiable Planning Data for Evaluating and Training Large Language Models [52.48858778580074]
  Planning is a fundamental capability for large language models (LLMs)<n>PlanningBench is a framework for generating scalable, diverse, verifiable planning data for both evaluation and training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T08:10:15Z)
• Planning Task Shielding: Detecting and Repairing Flaws in Planning Tasks through Turning them Unsolvable [5.343135467323389]
  We introduce planning task shielding: the problem of detecting and repairing flaws in planning tasks.<n>We propose $allmin$, an optimal algorithm that solves these tasks by minimally modifying the original actions.<n>We empirically evaluate the performance of $allmin$ in shielding planning tasks of increasing size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T12:57:37Z)
• PLAN-TUNING: Post-Training Language Models to Learn Step-by-Step Planning for Complex Problem Solving [66.42260489147617]
  We introduce PLAN-TUNING, a framework that distills synthetic task decompositions from large-scale language models.<n>Plan-TUNING fine-tunes smaller models via supervised and reinforcement-learning objectives to improve complex reasoning.<n>Our analysis demonstrates how planning trajectories improves complex reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T07:30:44Z)
• Hindsight Planner: A Closed-Loop Few-Shot Planner for Embodied Instruction Following [62.10809033451526]
  This work focuses on building a task planner for Embodied Instruction Following (EIF) using Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We frame the task as a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) and aim to develop a robust planner under a few-shot assumption.<n>Our experiments on the ALFRED dataset indicate that our planner achieves competitive performance under a few-shot assumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-27T10:05:45Z)
• GenPlan: Generative Sequence Models as Adaptive Planners [0.0]
  Sequence models have demonstrated remarkable success in behavioral planning by leveraging previously collected demonstrations.<n>However, solving multi-task missions remains a significant challenge, particularly when the planner must adapt to unseen constraints and tasks.<n>We propose GenPlan: a discrete-flow model for adaptive planner, enabling sample-generative exploration and exploitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T17:32:33Z)
• Propose, Assess, Search: Harnessing LLMs for Goal-Oriented Planning in Instructional Videos [48.15438373870542]
  VidAssist is an integrated framework designed for zero/few-shot goal-oriented planning in instructional videos. It employs a breadth-first search algorithm for optimal plan generation. Experiments demonstrate that VidAssist offers a unified framework for different goal-oriented planning setups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T17:57:28Z)
• Planning as In-Painting: A Diffusion-Based Embodied Task Planning Framework for Environments under Uncertainty [56.30846158280031]
  Task planning for embodied AI has been one of the most challenging problems. We propose a task-agnostic method named 'planning as in-painting' The proposed framework achieves promising performances in various embodied AI tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-02T10:07:17Z)
• AdaPlanner: Adaptive Planning from Feedback with Language Models [56.367020818139665]
  Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated the potential in acting as autonomous agents for sequential decision-making tasks. We propose a closed-loop approach, AdaPlanner, which allows the LLM agent to refine its self-generated plan adaptively in response to environmental feedback. To mitigate hallucination, we develop a code-style LLM prompt structure that facilitates plan generation across a variety of tasks, environments, and agent capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T05:52:27Z)
• POMRL: No-Regret Learning-to-Plan with Increasing Horizons [43.693739167594295]
  We study the problem of planning under model uncertainty in an online meta-reinforcement learning setting. We propose an algorithm to meta-learn the underlying structure across tasks, utilize it to plan in each task, and upper-bound the regret of the planning loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-30T03:09:45Z)
• Sequence-Based Plan Feasibility Prediction for Efficient Task and Motion Planning [36.300564378022315]
  We present a learning-enabled Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) algorithm for solving mobile manipulation problems in environments with many articulated and movable obstacles. The core of our algorithm is PIGINet, a novel Transformer-based learning method that takes in a task plan, the goal, and the initial state, and predicts the probability of finding motion trajectories associated with the task plan.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-03T04:12:04Z)
• Divide-and-Conquer Monte Carlo Tree Search For Goal-Directed Planning [78.65083326918351]
  We consider alternatives to an implicit sequential planning assumption. We propose Divide-and-Conquer Monte Carlo Tree Search (DC-MCTS) for approximating the optimal plan. We show that this algorithmic flexibility over planning order leads to improved results in navigation tasks in grid-worlds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-23T18:08:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.