From Alignment to Prediction: A Study of Self-Supervised Learning and Predictive Representation Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13518v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 06:04:45 GMT
• Title: From Alignment to Prediction: A Study of Self-Supervised Learning and Predictive Representation Learning
• Abstract summary: We study some of the recent developments in the realm of self-supervised learning.<n>We define a new category called Predictive Representation Learning (PRL)
• Score: 2.102846336724103
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Self-supervised learning has emerged as a major technique for the task of learning from unlabeled data, where the current methods mostly revolve around alignment of representations and input recon struction. Although such approaches have demonstrated excellent performance in practice, their scope remains mostly confined to learning from observed data and does not provide much help in terms of a learning structure that is predictive of the data distribution. In this paper, we study some of the recent developments in the realm of self-supervised learning. We define a new category called Predictive Representation Learning (PRL), which revolves around the latent prediction of unobserved components of data based on the observation. We propose a common taxonomy that classifies PRL along with alignment and reconstruction-based learning approaches. Furthermore, we argue that Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture(JEPA) can be considered as an exemplary member of this new paradigm. We further discuss theoretical perspectives and open challenges, highlighting predictive representation learning as a promising direction for future self-supervised learning research. In this study, we implemented Bootstrap Your Own Latent (BYOL), Masked Autoencoders (MAE), and Image-JEPA (I-JEPA) for comparative analysis. The results indicate that MAE achieves perfect similarity of 1.00, but exhibits relatively weak robustness of 0.55. In contrast, BYOL and I-JEPA attain accuracies of 0.98 and 0.95, with robustness scores of 0.75 and 0.78, respectively.

Related papers

• LLM Unlearning Under the Microscope: A Full-Stack View on Methods and Metrics [10.638045151201084]
  We present a principled taxonomy of twelve recent stateful unlearning methods.<n>We revisit the evaluation of unlearning effectiveness (UE), utility retention (UT), and robustness (Rob)<n>Our analysis shows that current evaluations, dominated by multiple-choice question (MCQ) accuracy, offer only a narrow perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T23:47:05Z)
• An Empirical Study on the Power of Future Prediction in Partially Observable Environments [15.773444560355694]
  Self-predictive auxiliary tasks have been shown to improve performance in fully observed settings, but their role in partial observability remains underexplored.<n>We introduce $textttDRL2$, an approach that explicitly decouples representation learning from reinforcement learning.<n>Our findings reinforce the idea that future prediction performance serves as a reliable indicator of representation quality and contributes to improved RL performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-11T04:53:40Z)
• A Probabilistic Model Behind Self-Supervised Learning [53.64989127914936]
  In self-supervised learning (SSL), representations are learned via an auxiliary task without annotated labels. We present a generative latent variable model for self-supervised learning. We show that several families of discriminative SSL, including contrastive methods, induce a comparable distribution over representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T13:31:17Z)
• Continual Learning with Pre-Trained Models: A Survey [61.97613090666247]
  Continual Learning aims to overcome the catastrophic forgetting of former knowledge when learning new ones. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of the latest advancements in PTM-based CL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T18:27:52Z)
• Unifying Self-Supervised Clustering and Energy-Based Models [9.3176264568834]
  We establish a principled connection between self-supervised learning and generative models.<n>We show that our solution can be integrated into a neuro-symbolic framework to tackle a simple yet non-trivial instantiation of the symbol grounding problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-30T04:46:16Z)
• From Pretext to Purpose: Batch-Adaptive Self-Supervised Learning [32.18543787821028]
  This paper proposes an adaptive technique of batch fusion for self-supervised contrastive learning. It achieves state-of-the-art performance under equitable comparisons. We suggest that the proposed method may contribute to the advancement of data-driven self-supervised learning research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T15:47:49Z)
• ASPEST: Bridging the Gap Between Active Learning and Selective Prediction [56.001808843574395]
  Selective prediction aims to learn a reliable model that abstains from making predictions when uncertain. Active learning aims to lower the overall labeling effort, and hence human dependence, by querying the most informative examples. In this work, we introduce a new learning paradigm, active selective prediction, which aims to query more informative samples from the shifted target domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T23:51:07Z)
• Chaos is a Ladder: A New Theoretical Understanding of Contrastive Learning via Augmentation Overlap [64.60460828425502]
  We propose a new guarantee on the downstream performance of contrastive learning. Our new theory hinges on the insight that the support of different intra-class samples will become more overlapped under aggressive data augmentations. We propose an unsupervised model selection metric ARC that aligns well with downstream accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T05:36:26Z)
• Learning by Distillation: A Self-Supervised Learning Framework for Optical Flow Estimation [71.76008290101214]
  DistillFlow is a knowledge distillation approach to learning optical flow. It achieves state-of-the-art unsupervised learning performance on both KITTI and Sintel datasets. Our models ranked 1st among all monocular methods on the KITTI 2015 benchmark, and outperform all published methods on the Sintel Final benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T09:13:34Z)
• Value-driven Hindsight Modelling [68.658900923595]
  Value estimation is a critical component of the reinforcement learning (RL) paradigm. Model learning can make use of the rich transition structure present in sequences of observations, but this approach is usually not sensitive to the reward function. We develop an approach for representation learning in RL that sits in between these two extremes. This provides tractable prediction targets that are directly relevant for a task, and can thus accelerate learning the value function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-19T18:10:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.