Anthropomorphism and Trust in Human-Large Language Model interactions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15316v1
• Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2026 21:55:58 GMT
• Title: Anthropomorphism and Trust in Human-Large Language Model interactions
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly prevalent in daily life.<n>Here, we investigate dimensions people use to anthropomorphize and attribute trust toward LLMs across more than 2,000 human-LLM interactions.
• Score: 1.0327060530379402
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With large language models (LLMs) becoming increasingly prevalent in daily life, so too has the tendency to attribute to them human-like minds and emotions, or anthropomorphize them. Here, we investigate dimensions people use to anthropomorphize and attribute trust toward LLMs across more than 2,000 human-LLM interactions. Participants (N=115) engaged with LLM chatbots systematically varied in warmth (friendliness), competence (capability, coherence), and empathy (cognitive and affective). Warmth and cognitive empathy significantly predicted perceptions on all outcomes (perceived anthropomorphism, trust, similarity, relational closeness, frustration, usefulness), while competence predicted all outcomes except for anthropomorphism. Affective empathy primarily predicted perceived relational measures, but did not predict the epistemic outcomes. Topic sub-analyses showed that more subjective, personally relevant topics (e.g., relationship advice) amplified these effects, producing greater human-likeness and relational connection with the LLM than did objective topics. Together, these findings reveal that warmth, competence, and empathy are key dimensions through which people attribute relational and epistemic perceptions to artificial agents.

Related papers

• Social Simulations with Large Language Model Risk Utopian Illusion [61.358959720048354]
  We introduce a systematic framework for analyzing large language models' behavior in social simulation.<n>Our approach simulates multi-agent interactions through chatroom-style conversations and analyzes them across five linguistic dimensions.<n>Our findings reveal that LLMs do not faithfully reproduce genuine human behavior but instead reflect overly idealized versions of it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T06:08:41Z)
• Large Language Models are Highly Aligned with Human Ratings of Emotional Stimuli [0.62914438169038]
  Emotions exert an immense influence over human behavior and cognition in both commonplace and high-stress tasks.<n>Discussions should be informed by an understanding of how large language models evaluate emotionally loaded stimuli or situations.<n>A model's alignment with human behavior in these cases can inform the effectiveness of LLMs for certain roles or interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T19:22:00Z)
• Measurement of LLM's Philosophies of Human Nature [113.47929131143766]
  We design the standardized psychological scale specifically targeting large language models (LLM)<n>We show that current LLMs exhibit a systemic lack of trust in humans.<n>We propose a mental loop learning framework, which enables LLM to continuously optimize its value system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T06:22:19Z)
• How Deep is Love in LLMs' Hearts? Exploring Semantic Size in Human-like Cognition [75.11808682808065]
  This study investigates whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit similar tendencies in understanding semantic size.<n>Our findings reveal that multi-modal training is crucial for LLMs to achieve more human-like understanding.<n> Lastly, we examine whether LLMs are influenced by attention-grabbing headlines with larger semantic sizes in a real-world web shopping scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T03:35:56Z)
• Identifying Features that Shape Perceived Consciousness in Large Language Model-based AI: A Quantitative Study of Human Responses [4.369058206183195]
  This study quantitively examines which features of AI-generated text lead humans to perceive subjective consciousness in large language model (LLM)-based AI systems.<n>Using regression and clustering analyses, we investigated how these features influence participants' perceptions of AI consciousness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T10:27:28Z)
• Judgment of Learning: A Human Ability Beyond Generative Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) increasingly mimic human cognition in various language-based tasks.<n>We introduce a cross-agent prediction model to assess whether ChatGPT-based LLMs align with human judgments of learning (JOL)<n>Our results revealed that while human JOL reliably predicted actual memory performance, none of the tested LLMs demonstrated comparable predictive accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T09:42:30Z)
• Multimodal Fusion with LLMs for Engagement Prediction in Natural Conversation [70.52558242336988]
  We focus on predicting engagement in dyadic interactions by scrutinizing verbal and non-verbal cues, aiming to detect signs of disinterest or confusion. In this work, we collect a dataset featuring 34 participants engaged in casual dyadic conversations, each providing self-reported engagement ratings at the end of each conversation. We introduce a novel fusion strategy using Large Language Models (LLMs) to integrate multiple behavior modalities into a multimodal transcript''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T18:28:12Z)
• Rel-A.I.: An Interaction-Centered Approach To Measuring Human-LM Reliance [73.19687314438133]
  We study how reliance is affected by contextual features of an interaction. We find that contextual characteristics significantly affect human reliance behavior. Our results show that calibration and language quality alone are insufficient in evaluating the risks of human-LM interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T18:00:05Z)
• Towards a Psychology of Machines: Large Language Models Predict Human Memory [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable abilities in natural language processing.<n>This study explores whether LLMs can predict human memory performance in tasks involving garden-path sentences and contextual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T08:41:14Z)
• Large Language Models Understand and Can be Enhanced by Emotional Stimuli [53.53886609012119]
  We take the first step towards exploring the ability of Large Language Models to understand emotional stimuli. Our experiments show that LLMs have a grasp of emotional intelligence, and their performance can be improved with emotional prompts. Our human study results demonstrate that EmotionPrompt significantly boosts the performance of generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T00:57:12Z)
• Anthropomorphization of AI: Opportunities and Risks [24.137106159123892]
  Anthropomorphization is the tendency to attribute human-like traits to non-human entities. With widespread adoption of AI systems, the tendency for users to anthropomorphize it increases significantly. We study the objective legal implications, as analyzed through the lens of the recent blueprint of AI bill of rights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T06:39:45Z)
• SensAI+Expanse Emotional Valence Prediction Studies with Cognition and Memory Integration [0.0]
  This work contributes with an artificial intelligent agent able to assist on cognitive science studies. The developed artificial agent system (SensAI+Expanse) includes machine learning algorithms, empathetic algorithms, and memory. Results of the present study show evidence of significant emotional behaviour differences between some age ranges and gender combinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-03T18:17:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.