Related papers: Beyond Coefficients: Forecast-Necessity Testing for Interpretable Causal Discovery in Nonlinear Time-Series Models

Beyond Coefficients: Forecast-Necessity Testing for Interpretable Causal Discovery in Nonlinear Time-Series Models

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18751v1
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:55:04 GMT
Title: Beyond Coefficients: Forecast-Necessity Testing for Interpretable Causal Discovery in Nonlinear Time-Series Models
Abstract summary: We argue that causal relevance in nonlinear time-series models should be evaluated through forecast necessity rather than coefficient magnitude.<n>We show that relationships with similar causal scores can differ dramatically in their predictive necessity due to redundancy, temporal persistence, and regime-specific effects.
Score: 0.0
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: Nonlinear machine-learning models are increasingly used to discover causal relationships in time-series data, yet the interpretation of their outputs remains poorly understood. In particular, causal scores produced by regularized neural autoregressive models are often treated as analogues of regression coefficients, leading to misleading claims of statistical significance. In this paper, we argue that causal relevance in nonlinear time-series models should be evaluated through forecast necessity rather than coefficient magnitude, and we present a practical evaluation procedure for doing so. We present an interpretable evaluation framework based on systematic edge ablation and forecast comparison, which tests whether a candidate causal relationship is required for accurate prediction. Using Neural Additive Vector Autoregression as a case study model, we apply this framework to a real-world case study of democratic development, modeled as a multivariate time series of panel data - democracy indicators across 139 countries. We show that relationships with similar causal scores can differ dramatically in their predictive necessity due to redundancy, temporal persistence, and regime-specific effects. Our results demonstrate how forecast-necessity testing supports more reliable causal reasoning in applied AI systems and provides practical guidance for interpreting nonlinear time-series models in high-stakes domains.

Related papers

Function-Valued Causal Influence in Nonlinear Time Series [0.0]
Causal discovery in time series is increasingly performed using nonlinear machine-learning models, yet the resulting causal relationships are almost always summarized by scalar edge scores.<n>We argue that this practice obscures the true object learned by nonlinear autoregressive models: a state-dependent function whose effect varies across regimes, magnitudes, and contexts.<n>We formalize function-valued causal influence for additive, contribution-decomposable architectures and show that scalar causal scores constitute a severe information bottleneck.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-26T00:34:49Z)
Generating Causal Temporal Interaction Graphs for Counterfactual Validation of Temporal Link Prediction [7.925229590936017]
We generate causal temporal interaction graphs (CTIGs) with known ground-truth causal structure.<n>To compare causal models, we propose a distance metric based on cross-model predictive error.<n>Our framework provides a foundation for causality benchmarking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-02T14:36:18Z)
Relational Conformal Prediction for Correlated Time Series [56.59852921638328]
We address the problem of uncertainty quantification in time series by exploiting correlated sequences.<n>We propose a novel distribution-free approach based on conformal prediction framework and quantile regression.<n>Our approach provides accurate coverage and achieves state-of-the-art uncertainty quantification in relevant benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-13T16:12:17Z)
Learning Graph Structures and Uncertainty for Accurate and Calibrated Time-series Forecasting [65.40983982856056]
We introduce STOIC, that leverages correlations between time-series to learn underlying structure between time-series and to provide well-calibrated and accurate forecasts. Over a wide-range of benchmark datasets STOIC provides 16% more accurate and better-calibrated forecasts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T20:14:32Z)
Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks. The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data. Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z)
Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Predictors in the Presence of Missing and Heterogeneous Data [23.280400290071732]
Deep learning approaches achieve outstanding predictive performance in modeling modern data, despite increasing complexity and scale.<n> evaluating the quality of predictive models becomes more challenging as traditional statistical assumptions often no longer hold.<n>This paper introduces a residual analysis framework designed to assess the optimality of temporal-temporal predictive neural models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-03T12:55:08Z)
Causality and Generalizability: Identifiability and Learning Methods [0.0]
This thesis contributes to the research areas concerning the estimation of causal effects, causal structure learning, and distributionally robust prediction methods. We present novel and consistent linear and non-linear causal effects estimators in instrumental variable settings that employ data-dependent mean squared prediction error regularization. We propose a general framework for distributional robustness with respect to intervention-induced distributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-04T13:12:11Z)
When in Doubt: Neural Non-Parametric Uncertainty Quantification for Epidemic Forecasting [70.54920804222031]
Most existing forecasting models disregard uncertainty quantification, resulting in mis-calibrated predictions. Recent works in deep neural models for uncertainty-aware time-series forecasting also have several limitations. We model the forecasting task as a probabilistic generative process and propose a functional neural process model called EPIFNP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T18:31:47Z)
Simultaneously Reconciled Quantile Forecasting of Hierarchically Related Time Series [11.004159006784977]
We propose a flexible nonlinear model that optimize quantile regression loss coupled with suitable regularization terms to maintain consistency of forecasts across hierarchies. The theoretical framework introduced herein can be applied to any forecasting model with an underlying differentiable loss function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-25T00:59:01Z)
On Disentangled Representations Learned From Correlated Data [59.41587388303554]
We bridge the gap to real-world scenarios by analyzing the behavior of the most prominent disentanglement approaches on correlated data. We show that systematically induced correlations in the dataset are being learned and reflected in the latent representations. We also demonstrate how to resolve these latent correlations, either using weak supervision during training or by post-hoc correcting a pre-trained model with a small number of labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-14T12:47:34Z)
Performance metrics for intervention-triggering prediction models do not reflect an expected reduction in outcomes from using the model [71.9860741092209]
Clinical researchers often select among and evaluate risk prediction models. Standard metrics calculated from retrospective data are only related to model utility under certain assumptions. When predictions are delivered repeatedly throughout time, the relationship between standard metrics and utility is further complicated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-02T16:26:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.