Epistemic orientation in parliamentary discourse is associated with deliberative democracy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19699v2
• Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:22:04 GMT
• Title: Epistemic orientation in parliamentary discourse is associated with deliberative democracy
• Abstract summary: We introduce a scalable approach to measure epistemic orientation using the Evidence--Minus--Intuition ( EMI) score.<n>We apply this approach to 15 million parliamentary speech segments spanning 1946 to 2025 across seven countries.<n>We find that EMI is positively associated with deliberative democracy within countries over time, with consistent relationships in both contemporaneous and lagged analyses.
• Score: 0.5607632629560914
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The pursuit of truth is central to democratic deliberation and governance, yet political discourse reflects varying epistemic orientations, ranging from evidence-based reasoning grounded in verifiable information to intuition-based reasoning rooted in beliefs and subjective interpretation. We introduce a scalable approach to measure epistemic orientation using the Evidence--Minus--Intuition (EMI) score, derived from large language model (LLM) ratings and embedding-based semantic similarity. Applying this approach to 15 million parliamentary speech segments spanning 1946 to 2025 across seven countries, we examine temporal patterns in discourse and its association with deliberative democracy and governance. We find that EMI is positively associated with deliberative democracy within countries over time, with consistent relationships in both contemporaneous and lagged analyses. EMI is also positively associated with the transparency and predictable implementation of laws as a dimension of governance. These findings suggest that the epistemic nature of political discourse is crucial for both the quality of democracy and governance.

Related papers

• Epistemic orientation predicts legislative effectiveness among members of the US Congress [0.5607632629560914]
  Evidence-oriented language in U.S. congressional floor speeches has declined since the mid-1970s.<n>This study shifts the analysis from congressional sessions to individual members of Congress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-10T17:41:54Z)
• Uncovering Political Bias in Large Language Models using Parliamentary Voting Records [2.272052150526026]
  This paper introduces a general methodology for constructing political bias benchmarks.<n>We instantiate this methodology in three national case studies.<n>We assess ideological tendencies and political entity bias in LLM behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T18:18:25Z)
• Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis [51.95395936342771]
  We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus.<n>We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.<n>Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T20:30:20Z)
• Identifying Algorithmic and Domain-Specific Bias in Parliamentary Debate Summarisation [13.982513887272683]
  This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to summarise plenary debates from the European Parliament.<n>We propose a structured, multi-stage summarisation framework that improves textual coherence and content fidelity.<n>We find evidence of consistent positional and partisan biases, with certain speakers systematically under-represented or misattributed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T11:49:33Z)
• Democratic or Authoritarian? Probing a New Dimension of Political Biases in Large Language Models [72.89977583150748]
  We propose a novel methodology to assess how Large Language Models align with broader geopolitical value systems.<n>We find that LLMs generally favor democratic values and leaders, but exhibit increases favorability toward authoritarian figures when prompted in Mandarin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-15T07:52:07Z)
• Aligning Trustworthy AI with Democracy: A Dual Taxonomy of Opportunities and Risks [26.916552909766118]
  This paper introduces a dual taxonomy to evaluate AI's complex relationship with democracy.<n>TheAIRD taxonomy identifies how AI can undermine core democratic principles such as autonomy, fairness, and trust.<n>The AIPD taxonomy highlights AI's potential to enhance transparency, participation, efficiency, and evidence-based policymaking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T10:51:08Z)
• Aligning AI with Public Values: Deliberation and Decision-Making for Governing Multimodal LLMs in Political Video Analysis [48.14390493099495]
  How AI models should deal with political topics has been discussed, but it remains challenging and requires better governance.<n>This paper examines the governance of large language models through individual and collective deliberation, focusing on politically sensitive videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T03:17:38Z)
• Representation Bias in Political Sample Simulations with Large Language Models [54.48283690603358]
  This study seeks to identify and quantify biases in simulating political samples with Large Language Models. Using the GPT-3.5-Turbo model, we leverage data from the American National Election Studies, German Longitudinal Election Study, Zuobiao dataset, and China Family Panel Studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T05:52:26Z)
• Exploring the Jungle of Bias: Political Bias Attribution in Language Models via Dependency Analysis [86.49858739347412]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked intense debate regarding the prevalence of bias in these models and its mitigation. We propose a prompt-based method for the extraction of confounding and mediating attributes which contribute to the decision process. We find that the observed disparate treatment can at least in part be attributed to confounding and mitigating attributes and model misalignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T00:02:25Z)
• From Heuristic to Analytic: Cognitively Motivated Strategies for Coherent Physical Commonsense Reasoning [66.98861219674039]
  Heuristic-Analytic Reasoning (HAR) strategies drastically improve the coherence of rationalizations for model decisions. Our findings suggest that human-like reasoning strategies can effectively improve the coherence and reliability of PLM reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T19:46:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.