Co-Designing Error Mitigation and Error Detection for Logical Qubits

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19871v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 18:00:02 GMT
• Title: Co-Designing Error Mitigation and Error Detection for Logical Qubits
• Abstract summary: Near-term quantum workloads demand error management.<n>QED encodes logical qubits and discards error-flagged runs.<n>PEC can correct these in software, but at exponential cost in noise strength.
• Score: 0.6100263509208005
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Near-term quantum workloads demand error management, yet the two lightest-weight techniques, Quantum Error Detection (QED) and Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC), have complementary cost profiles whose joint architectural design space remains unexplored. QED encodes logical qubits and discards error-flagged runs, filtering noise with low qubit overhead but leaving residual errors; PEC can correct these in software, but at exponential cost in noise strength. If QED efficiently reduces per-gate noise, PEC's cost savings can outweigh QED's discard overhead; realizing this, however, requires solving two system-level design challenges. First, the \textit{QED interval} -- how often detection cycles are inserted -- is a tunable architectural parameter governing the cost-accuracy tradeoff. We derive an efficiency condition and show that the canonical one-cycle-per-gate frequency does not achieve break-even in any code we evaluate, while optimized intervals on high-rate Iceberg codes do. Second, we discover that naive PEC+QED integration \textit{degrades} accuracy below the QED-only baseline. The root cause is a transient error profile in the first detection cycle that corrupts PEC's noise model. We develop \textit{steady-state extraction}, a co-designed characterization protocol that isolates steady-state error behavior, reducing estimation bias by up to $10.2\times$. On a $[[6,4,2]]$ Iceberg code running QAOA ($p{=}4$--$8$) with a fixed shot budget, PEC+QED achieves $2$--$11\times$ lower absolute error and up to $31\times$ lower MSE versus PEC on physical qubits, with per-interval savings compounding over interval depth.

Related papers

• The Gain-Engineered Transmon [68.89136228609398]
  We introduce and experimentally realize a noise-biased qubit in a standard transmon-readout resonator circuit.<n>Our results open a path towards using this system as a simple building-block for hardware-efficient quantum error detection and correction schemes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-26T17:00:42Z)
• X-Z Round Scheduling for the Surface Code with Defects under Biased Noise [1.6832709987512862]
  Fault-tolerant Quantum Computing relies on Quantum Error Correction (QEC) codes that encode logical qubits across many physical qubits to detect and correct errors.<n>The fabrication of solid-state quantum processors introduces hardware defects, resulting in defective qubits and couplers that must be discarded.<n>We investigate the optimal $X$-to-$Z$ checks round-scheduling ratio under biased noise systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T01:46:14Z)
• SSTQ:Privacy-Preserving Vector Quantization via Subsampled Stochastic TurboQuant [79.24089819400126]
  Subsampled TurboQuant (SSTQ) is a framework that combines overcomplete equal-width tight frames, coordinate subsampling, and privacy-aware quantization.<n>SSTQ achieves mean squared error scaling while using only $lceil log N il + b$ bits per client, where $N = (d)$ is the frame size.<n>We also derive a surrogate privacy-aware codebook objective that reduces the codebook-dependent MSE scaling from $O(4b)$ to $O(2b)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T17:51:25Z)
• Zeno-Enhanced Probabilistic Error Cancellation with Quantum Error Detection Codes [2.6031571481535143]
  We exploit a complementarity between quantum error-detecting codes and probabilistic error cancellation.<n>We map physical noise to a weaker accepted logical channel, and then applying PEC only to the residual channel.<n>The resulting feedback-free QED+PEC scheme interleaves Clifford logical blocks, stabilizer measurements, post-selection, and probabilistic cancellation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T14:06:27Z)
• Boundary-Aware Stabilizer Scheduling for Distributed Quantum Error Correction [1.556083770714207]
  In topological quantum error correction, such as color codes, parity checks require remote CNOT operations using heralded Bell pairs.<n>A natural way to reduce this overhead is to skip some seam measurements.<n>We develop a scheduling module that integrates directly into standard syndrome-extraction circuits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T11:49:07Z)
• Enhancing Fault-Tolerant Surface Code Decoding with Iterative Lattice Reweighting [12.330043396100635]
  We introduce the Iterative Reweighting Minimum-Weight Perfect Matching (IRMWPM) decoder.<n>We show that IRMWPM reduces logical error rates by over 20x with only a few distances.<n>It also raises the accuracy threshold from 1% to 1.16%, making it practical for near-term real-time decoding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T14:45:59Z)
• Low-depth quantum error correction via three-qubit gates in Rydberg atom arrays [0.0]
  Quantum error correction (QEC) requires the execution of deep quantum circuits with large numbers of physical qubits to protect information against errors.<n>We show how to realize fast and efficient surface code stabilizer using only two $CZ$ gates -- instead of four $CZ$ -- while preserving fault tolerance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T15:37:48Z)
• Demonstrating dynamic surface codes [118.67046728951689]
  We experimentally demonstrate three time-dynamic implementations of the surface code.<n>First, we embed the surface code on a hexagonal lattice, reducing the necessary couplings per qubit from four to three.<n>Second, we walk a surface code, swapping the role of data and measure qubits each round, achieving error correction with built-in removal of accumulated non-computational errors.<n>Third, we realize the surface code using iSWAP gates instead of the traditional CNOT, extending the set of viable gates for error correction without additional overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T21:56:50Z)
• Approximate Autonomous Quantum Error Correction with Reinforcement Learning [4.015029887580199]
  Autonomous quantum error correction (AQEC) protects logical qubits by engineered dissipation. Bosonic code spaces, where single-photon loss represents the dominant source of error, are promising candidates for AQEC. We propose a bosonic code for approximate AQEC by relaxing the Knill-Laflamme conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-22T12:42:52Z)
• Witnessing entanglement in trapped-ion quantum error correction under realistic noise [41.94295877935867]
  Quantum Error Correction (QEC) exploits redundancy by encoding logical information into multiple physical qubits. We present a detailed microscopic error model to estimate the average gate infidelity of two-qubit light-shift gates used in trapped-ion platforms. We then apply this realistic error model to quantify the multipartite entanglement generated by circuits that act as QEC building blocks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T20:00:36Z)
• Erasure qubits: Overcoming the $T_1$ limit in superconducting circuits [105.54048699217668]
  amplitude damping time, $T_phi$, has long stood as the major factor limiting quantum fidelity in superconducting circuits. We propose a scheme for overcoming the conventional $T_phi$ limit on fidelity by designing qubits in a way that amplitude damping errors can be detected and converted into erasure errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T17:39:21Z)
• Improved decoding of circuit noise and fragile boundaries of tailored surface codes [61.411482146110984]
  We introduce decoders that are both fast and accurate, and can be used with a wide class of quantum error correction codes. Our decoders, named belief-matching and belief-find, exploit all noise information and thereby unlock higher accuracy demonstrations of QEC. We find that the decoders led to a much higher threshold and lower qubit overhead in the tailored surface code with respect to the standard, square surface code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-09T18:48:54Z)
• Exponential suppression of bit or phase flip errors with repetitive error correction [56.362599585843085]
  State-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near $10-3$. Quantum error correction (QEC) promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits. We implement 1D repetition codes embedded in a 2D grid of superconducting qubits which demonstrate exponential suppression of bit or phase-flip errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T17:11:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.