Large language models perceive cities through a culturally uneven baseline

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20048v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 23:05:15 GMT
• Title: Large language models perceive cities through a culturally uneven baseline
• Abstract summary: We test urban perception in large language models using a balanced global street-view sample and prompts that either remain neutral or invoke different regional cultural standpoints.<n>Across open-ended descriptions and structured place judgments, the neutral condition proved not to be neutral in practice.<n>Prompts associated with Europe and Northern America remained systematically closer to the baseline than many non-Western prompts.
• Score: 5.705725225868815
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to describe, evaluate and interpret places, yet it remains unclear whether they do so from a culturally neutral standpoint. Here we test urban perception in frontier LLMs using a balanced global street-view sample and prompts that either remain neutral or invoke different regional cultural standpoints. Across open-ended descriptions and structured place judgments, the neutral condition proved not to be neutral in practice. Prompts associated with Europe and Northern America remained systematically closer to the baseline than many non-Western prompts, indicating that model perception is organized around a culturally uneven reference frame rather than a universal one. Cultural prompting also shifted affective evaluation, producing sentiment-based ingroup preference for some prompted identities. Comparisons with regional human text-image benchmarks showed that culturally proximate prompting could improve alignment with human descriptions, but it did not recover human levels of semantic diversity and often preserved an affectively elevated style. The same asymmetry reappeared in structured judgments of safety, beauty, wealth, liveliness, boredom and depression, where model outputs were interpretable but only partly reproduced human group differences. These findings suggest that LLMs do not simply perceive cities from nowhere: they do so through a culturally uneven baseline that shapes what appears ordinary, familiar and positively valued.

Related papers

• MemeBridge: A Dataset for Benchmarking and Mitigating the Bidirectional Cultural Gap in Meme Interpretation [16.37143301773968]
  We introduce MemeBridge, a curated dataset centered on U.S.-originated memes.<n>Here, context refers to implicit cultural knowledge, including background beliefs, norms, and shared assumptions that shape meme comprehension.<n>We observe that the anticipated misunderstandings from U.S. participants are often inaccurate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-31T23:38:23Z)
• Pluralis v0.1: Towards a Multicultural, Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for AI Risk and Reliability [46.80780735011334]
  Current AI safety evaluation and benchmarking frameworks rely on Western-centric culture-agnostic defaults that mask critical regional laws, socio-linguistic nuances, and cultural taboos.<n>We introduce Pluralis v0.1: a novel multimodal, multi-regional, and multilingual dataset built from a culture-first perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T12:21:52Z)
• Whose Norms? Disentangling Cultural and Personal Alignment in Large Language Models [66.34115263472931]
  Large language models are increasingly used for social decision-making situations that require balancing cultural norms with personal preferences.<n>We introduce PACT, the Personal-Preference and Cultural-Norm Trade-off framework, which evaluates whether models choose to follow a cultural norm or allow personal preferences.<n>Our five-country human study on PACT shows that culture-following in humans is mainly driven by scenario country, with the lowest agreement when participants judge their own cultural contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-05T22:20:30Z)
• CultureForest: Understanding and Evaluating Cultural Norm Grounded Reasoning in LLMs [59.09971492475217]
  We introduce CultureForest, a benchmark for textitCultural Norm Grounded Reasoning<n>CultureForest comprises 5,378 examples across 8 domains and 53 countries/regions.<n>Extensive experiments reveal that even top-tier models degrade substantially in open-ended settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T08:25:12Z)
• Do LLMs Capture Embodied Cognition and Cultural Variation? Cross-Linguistic Evidence from Demonstratives [9.704536811806728]
  We introduce demonstratives, fundamental spatial expressions like "this/that" in English and "zh/n" in Chinese, as a novel probe for grounded knowledge.<n>Using 6,400 responses from 320 native speakers, we establish a human baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T09:30:12Z)
• Cultural Counterfactuals: Evaluating Cultural Biases in Large Vision-Language Models with Counterfactual Examples [13.476728526770023]
  A key challenge in measuring cultural biases is that determining which group an individual belongs to often depends upon cultural context cues in images.<n>We introduce Cultural Counterfactuals: a high-quality synthetic dataset containing nearly 60k counterfactual images for measuring cultural biases related to religion, nationality, and socioeconomic status.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T20:19:53Z)
• Tears or Cheers? Benchmarking LLMs via Culturally Elicited Distinct Affective Responses [28.3173238194554]
  We introduce CEDAR, a benchmark constructed entirely from scenarios capturing culturally underlinetextscElicited underlinetextscDistinct underlinetextscAffective underlinetextscResponses.<n>The resulting benchmark comprises 10,962 instances across seven languages and 14 fine-grained emotion categories, with each language including 400 multimodal and 1,166 text-only samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T13:04:26Z)
• CURE: Cultural Understanding and Reasoning Evaluation - A Framework for "Thick" Culture Alignment Evaluation in LLMs [24.598338950728234]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in culturally diverse environments.<n>Existing methods focus on de-contextualized correctness or forced-choice judgments.<n>We introduce a set of benchmarks that present models with realistic situational contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-15T03:39:13Z)
• LLMs and Cultural Values: the Impact of Prompt Language and Explicit Cultural Framing [0.21485350418225244]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly being adopted by users across the globe, who interact with them in a diverse range of languages.<n>We examine how prompt language and cultural framing influence model responses and their alignment with human values in different countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T02:09:29Z)
• I Am Aligned, But With Whom? MENA Values Benchmark for Evaluating Cultural Alignment and Multilingual Bias in LLMs [5.060243371992739]
  We introduce MENAValues, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the cultural alignment and multilingual biases of large language models (LLMs)<n> Drawing from large-scale, authoritative human surveys, we curate a structured dataset that captures the sociocultural landscape of MENA with population-level response distributions from 16 countries.<n>Our analysis reveals three critical phenomena: "Cross-Lingual Value Shifts" where identical questions yield drastically different responses based on language, "Reasoning-Induced Degradation" where prompting models to explain their reasoning worsens cultural alignment, and "Logit Leakage" where models refuse sensitive questions while internal probabilities reveal strong hidden
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T05:10:57Z)
• Cross-Cultural Transfer of Commonsense Reasoning in LLMs: Evidence from the Arab World [68.19795061447044]
  This paper investigates cross-cultural transfer of commonsense reasoning in the Arab world.<n>Using a culturally grounded commonsense reasoning dataset covering 13 Arab countries, we evaluate lightweight alignment methods.<n>Our results show that merely 12 culture-specific examples from one country can improve performance in others by 10% on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T17:24:14Z)
• CAIRe: Cultural Attribution of Images by Retrieval-Augmented Evaluation [61.130639734982395]
  We introduce CAIRe, a novel evaluation metric that assesses the degree of cultural relevance of an image.<n>Our framework grounds entities and concepts in the image to a knowledge base and uses factual information to give independent graded judgments for each culture label.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T17:16:23Z)
• See It from My Perspective: How Language Affects Cultural Bias in Image Understanding [60.70852566256668]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) can respond to queries about images in many languages.<n>We characterize the Western bias of VLMs in image understanding and investigate the role that language plays in this disparity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T15:49:51Z)
• Not All Countries Celebrate Thanksgiving: On the Cultural Dominance in Large Language Models [89.94270049334479]
  This paper identifies a cultural dominance issue within large language models (LLMs) LLMs often provide inappropriate English-culture-related answers that are not relevant to the expected culture when users ask in non-English languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T05:38:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.