Temporal Difference Calibration in Sequential Tasks: Application to Vision-Language-Action Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20472v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 11:58:05 GMT
• Title: Temporal Difference Calibration in Sequential Tasks: Application to Vision-Language-Action Models
• Abstract summary: We introduce a sequential extension of the Brier score and show that, for binary outcomes, its risk minimizer coincides with the VLA policy's value function.<n>This connection bridges uncertainty calibration and reinforcement learning, enabling the use of temporal-difference (TD) value estimation.<n>Interestingly, we show that when calibrated using TD, the VLA's single-step action probabilities can yield competitive uncertainty estimates.
• Score: 42.27626776636064
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in vision-language-action (VLA) models for robotics have highlighted the importance of reliable uncertainty quantification in sequential tasks. However, assessing and improving calibration in such settings remains mostly unexplored, especially when only partial trajectories are observed. In this work, we formulate sequential calibration for episodic tasks, where task-success confidence is produced along an episode, while success is determined at the end of it. We introduce a sequential extension of the Brier score and show that, for binary outcomes, its risk minimizer coincides with the VLA policy's value function. This connection bridges uncertainty calibration and reinforcement learning, enabling the use of temporal-difference (TD) value estimation as a principled calibration mechanism over time. We empirically show that TD calibration improves performance relative to the state-of-the-art on simulated and real-robot data. Interestingly, we show that when calibrated using TD, the VLA's single-step action probabilities can yield competitive uncertainty estimates, in contrast to recent findings that employed different calibration techniques.

Related papers

• Uncertainty Quantification for Flow-Based Vision-Language-Action Models [33.28454469934064]
  Vision-language-action models (VLAs) combine vision-language backbones with expressive generative action heads trained via flow matching on large-scale robotic datasets.<n>Despite their strong empirical performance in robotic manipulation, VLAs lack mechanisms to quantify confidence in their predictions and to detect when their actions may be unreliable.<n>We propose SAVE, a framework for uncertainty-guided active fine-tuning that reduces the number of costly expert demonstrations required to adapt VLAs to new tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T15:19:09Z)
• Transformer-Based Predictive Maintenance for Risk-Aware Instrument Calibration [0.13543803103181612]
  We study calibration scheduling as a predictive maintenance problem.<n>We adapt the NASA C-MAPSS benchmark into a calibration setting.<n>We show that condition-based calibration can be framed as a joint forecasting and decision problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T06:32:01Z)
• Reshaping Action Error Distributions for Reliable Vision-Language-Action Models [69.38615670891038]
  In robotic manipulation, vision-language-action (VLA) models have emerged as a promising paradigm for learning generalizable and scalable robot policies.<n>We focus on continuous-action VLA models and move beyond conventional MSE-based regression by reshaping action error distributions during training.<n>We evaluate our approaches across standard, few-shot, and noisy settings on multiple representative VLA architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T05:37:09Z)
• DATS: Distance-Aware Temperature Scaling for Calibrated Class-Incremental Learning [13.864609787260298]
  Continual Learning (CL) is gaining increasing attention for its ability to enable a single model to learn incrementally from a sequence of new classes.<n>In safety-critical applications, predictive models should also be able to reliably communicate their uncertainty in a manner - that is, with confidence scores aligned to the true frequencies of target events.<n>We propose Distance-Aware Temperature Scaling (DATS), which combines prototype-based distance estimation with distance-aware calibration to infer task proximity and assign adaptive temperatures without prior task information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T13:46:56Z)
• Confidence Calibration in Vision-Language-Action Models [2.230383995796716]
  Trustworthy robot behavior requires high levels of task success and reliably quantify how likely it is to succeed.<n>We present the first systematic study of confidence calibration in vision-language-action (VLA) foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T10:26:10Z)
• O-TPT: Orthogonality Constraints for Calibrating Test-time Prompt Tuning in Vision-Language Models [17.56932003351322]
  Test-time prompt tuning for vision-language models (VLMs) is getting attention because of their ability to learn with unlabeled data without fine-tuning.<n>The resulting models tend to demonstrate poor calibration, which casts doubts on the reliability and trustworthiness of these models.<n>We propose a new approach, called O-TPT, that introduces orthogonality constraints on the textual features corresponding to the learnable prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-15T11:45:54Z)
• Rethinking Early Stopping: Refine, Then Calibrate [49.966899634962374]
  We present a novel variational formulation of the calibration-refinement decomposition.<n>We provide theoretical and empirical evidence that calibration and refinement errors are not minimized simultaneously during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T15:03:54Z)
• Calibrating Large Language Models with Sample Consistency [76.23956851098598]
  We explore the potential of deriving confidence from the distribution of multiple randomly sampled model generations, via three measures of consistency. Results show that consistency-based calibration methods outperform existing post-hoc approaches. We offer practical guidance on choosing suitable consistency metrics for calibration, tailored to the characteristics of various LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T16:15:20Z)
• Selective Learning: Towards Robust Calibration with Dynamic Regularization [79.92633587914659]
  Miscalibration in deep learning refers to there is a discrepancy between the predicted confidence and performance. We introduce Dynamic Regularization (DReg) which aims to learn what should be learned during training thereby circumventing the confidence adjusting trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T11:25:20Z)
• Large Language Models are Miscalibrated In-Context Learners [22.30783674111999]
  In this work, we deliver an in-depth analysis of the behavior across different choices of learning methods.<n>We observe that the miscalibration problem exists across all learning methods in low-resource setups.<n>We find that self-ensembling with max probability produces robust and calibrated predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T11:55:10Z)
• Threshold-Consistent Margin Loss for Open-World Deep Metric Learning [42.03620337000911]
  Existing losses used in deep metric learning (DML) for image retrieval often lead to highly non-uniform intra-class and inter-class representation structures. Inconsistency often complicates the threshold selection process when deploying commercial image retrieval systems. We propose a novel variance-based metric called Operating-Point-Inconsistency-Score (OPIS) that quantifies the variance in the operating characteristics across classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-08T21:16:41Z)
• Bridging Precision and Confidence: A Train-Time Loss for Calibrating Object Detection [58.789823426981044]
  We propose a novel auxiliary loss formulation that aims to align the class confidence of bounding boxes with the accurateness of predictions. Our results reveal that our train-time loss surpasses strong calibration baselines in reducing calibration error for both in and out-domain scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T08:56:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.