Objective Shaping with Hard Negatives: Windowed Partial AUC Optimization for RL-based LLM Recommenders

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22504v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:31:57 GMT
• Title: Objective Shaping with Hard Negatives: Windowed Partial AUC Optimization for RL-based LLM Recommenders
• Abstract summary: Training with beam-search negatives consistently outperforms random negatives.<n>We introduce Windowed Partial AUC (WPAUC), which constrains the false positive rate (FPR) to a window to more directly align with Top-$K$ metrics.<n>Experiments on four real-world datasets validate the theory and deliver consistent state-of-the-art performance.
• Score: 74.55181072260713
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) effectively optimizes Large Language Model (LLM)-based recommenders by contrasting positive and negative items. Empirically, training with beam-search negatives consistently outperforms random negatives, yet the mechanism is not well understood. We address this gap by analyzing the induced optimization objective and show that: (i) Under binary reward feedback, optimizing LLM recommenders with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is theoretically equivalent to maximizing the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC), which is often misaligned with Top-$K$ recommendation; and (ii) Replacing random negatives with beam-search negatives reshapes the objective toward partial AUC, improving alignment with Top-$K$ metrics. Motivated by this perspective, we introduce Windowed Partial AUC (WPAUC), which constrains the false positive rate (FPR) to a window [$α,α+d$] to more directly align with Top-$K$ metrics. We further propose an efficient Threshold-Adjusted Windowed reweighting (TAWin) RL method for its optimization, enabling explicit control over the targeted Top-$K$ performance. Experiments on four real-world datasets validate the theory and deliver consistent state-of-the-art performance.

Related papers

• RRPO: Reference-Relative Policy Optimization with Stratified Conditional Rollouts [84.20747697259326]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has shown strong effectiveness in reinforcement learning from verifiable feedback.<n>We propose textbfReference-Relative Policy Optimization (RRPO), which generalizes GRPO by replacing direct correctness-based advantage construction with reference-relative contrastive comparisons.<n>We evaluate RRPO using anchor-based contrastive advantages throughout policy optimization, without relying on task ground-truth verifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-20T19:40:25Z)
• Advantage Collapse in Group Relative Policy Optimization: Diagnosis and Mitigation [13.272542054938258]
  We introduce the Advantage Collapse Rate (ACR), the first metric quantifying the proportion of training batches with ineffective gradients.<n>We then propose Adaptive Virtual Sample Policy Optimization (AVSPO), a lightweight extension of GRPO that injects virtual reward samples.<n>AVSPO reduces advantage collapse by 58-63% relative to GRPO and yields consistent accuracy gains of 4-6 percentage points across all model scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T12:57:37Z)
• LambdaPO: A Lambda Style Policy Optimization for Reasoning Language Models [34.349722314481824]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization is prized for its efficacy in foregoing an explicit value-critic.<n>The method's reliance on a monolithic statistical baseline, such as the group mean, collapses the relational topology of the trajectory space into a single scalar.<n>We introduce a novel framework, Lambda Policy Optimization (LambdaPO), that addresses this information-theoretic bottleneck.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T06:10:24Z)
• Unbiased Dynamic Pruning for Efficient Group-Based Policy Optimization [60.87651283510059]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) effectively scales LLM reasoning but incurs prohibitive computational costs.<n>We propose Dynamic Pruning Policy Optimization (DPPO), a framework that enables dynamic pruning while preserving unbiased gradient estimation.<n>To mitigate the data sparsity induced by pruning, we introduce Dense Prompt Packing, a window-based greedy strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T14:48:53Z)
• On Negative-aware Preference Optimization for Recommendation [10.082739500992545]
  We propose NAPO, an enhanced framework for preference optimization in LLM-based recommendation.<n> NAPO introduces two key innovations: (1) in-batch negative sharing, which expands the pool of negative samples without additional memory overhead, and (2) dynamic reward margin adjustment, which adapts model updates based on the confidence of negative samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T09:37:07Z)
• Accelerating RL for LLM Reasoning with Optimal Advantage Regression [52.0792918455501]
  We propose a novel two-stage policy optimization framework that directly approximates the optimal advantage function.<n>$A$*-PO achieves competitive performance across a wide range of mathematical reasoning benchmarks.<n>It reduces training time by up to 2$times$ and peak memory usage by over 30% compared to PPO, GRPO, and REBEL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T03:58:50Z)
• Multi-Preference Optimization: Generalizing DPO via Set-Level Contrasts [17.243429150450886]
  We propose $textbfMulti-Preference Optimization (MPO) to optimize over entire sets of responses.<n>MPO employs deviation-based weighting, which emphasizes outlier responses that deviate most from the mean reward.<n>We theoretically prove that MPO reduces alignment bias at a rate of $mathcalOleft(frac1sqrtnright)$ with respect to the number of responses per query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T21:50:22Z)
• Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer [52.09480867526656]
  We identify the source of misalignment as a form of distributional shift and uncertainty in learning human preferences.<n>To mitigate overoptimization, we first propose a theoretical algorithm that chooses the best policy for an adversarially chosen reward model.<n>Using the equivalence between reward models and the corresponding optimal policy, the algorithm features a simple objective that combines a preference optimization loss and a supervised learning loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T05:38:50Z)
• $i$REPO: $i$mplicit Reward Pairwise Difference based Empirical Preference Optimization [12.266207199002604]
  Large Language Models (LLM) can sometimes produce outputs that deviate from human expectations. We propose a novel framework named $i$REPO, which utilizes implicit Reward pairwise difference regression for Empirical Preference Optimization. We show that $i$REPO effectively achieves self-alignment using soft-label, self-generated responses and the logit of empirical AI annotators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T05:42:11Z)
• Lower-Left Partial AUC: An Effective and Efficient Optimization Metric for Recommendation [52.45394284415614]
  We propose a new optimization metric, Lower-Left Partial AUC (LLPAUC), which is computationally efficient like AUC but strongly correlates with Top-K ranking metrics. LLPAUC considers only the partial area under the ROC curve in the Lower-Left corner to push the optimization focus on Top-K.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T13:58:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.