TADI: Tool-Augmented Drilling Intelligence via Agentic LLM Orchestration over Heterogeneous Wellsite Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00060v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 03:19:39 GMT
• Title: TADI: Tool-Augmented Drilling Intelligence via Agentic LLM Orchestration over Heterogeneous Wellsite Data
• Abstract summary: TADI (Tool-Augmented Drilling Intelligence) is an agentic AI system that transforms drilling operational data into evidence-based analytical intelligence.<n>TADI integrates 1,759 daily drilling reports, selected WIT real-time objects, 15,634 production records, formation tops, and perforations into a dual-store architecture.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present TADI (Tool-Augmented Drilling Intelligence), an agentic AI system that transforms drilling operational data into evidence-based analytical intelligence. Applied to the Equinor Volve Field dataset, TADI integrates 1,759 daily drilling reports, selected WITSML real-time objects, 15,634 production records, formation tops, and perforations into a dual-store architecture: DuckDB for structured queries over 12 tables with 65,447 rows, and ChromaDB for semantic search over 36,709 embedded documents. Twelve domain-specialized tools, orchestrated by a large language model via iterative function calling, support multi-step evidence gathering that cross-references structured drilling measurements with daily report narratives. The system parses all 1,759 DDR XML files with zero errors, handles three incompatible well naming conventions, and is backed by 95 automated tests plus a 130-question stress-question taxonomy spanning six operational categories. We formalize the agent's behavior as a sequential tool-selection problem and propose the Evidence Grounding Score (EGS) as a simple grounding-compliance proxy based on measurements, attributed DDR quotations, and required answer sections. The complete 6,084-line, framework-free implementation is reproducible given the public Volve download and an API key, and the case studies and qualitative ablation analysis suggest that domain-specialized tool design, rather than model scale alone, is the primary driver of analytical quality in technical operations.

Related papers

• Joint Optimization of Tool Creation and Use for Large Language Model Agents [69.07066297088187]
  SMITH (-grounded Multi-task Iterative Tool Honing) trains tool creation and tool use inside a single policy.<n>A 4B Qwen3 trained with SMITH on 13 procedural reasoning tasks with exact verifiers reaches 79.8 macro-average accuracy on held-out tasks.<n>It also reaches 40.4 on TabMWP-Hard and 42.6 on out-of-domain GQA (+7.6 over the best same-backbone inference-time baseline)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T13:59:34Z)
• DataSpace: Benchmarking Data Agents for Verifiable Analytics over Heterogeneous Workspaces [25.28248447900504]
  Data agents enable natural-language analytics over organizational workspaces.<n>Existing benchmarks largely isolate structured querying, retrieval, or open-ended analysis.<n>We introduce DataSpace, a benchmark in which data agents produce verifiable tabular results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T10:48:11Z)
• Template-as-Ontology: Configurable Synthetic Data Infrastructure for Cross-Domain Manufacturing AI Validation [0.0]
  A single Python configuration module serves as the specification for a time-stepped manufacturing simulator.<n>A five-layer pipeline--simulation, CDC/Iceberg lakehouse, star schema, and 12 parameterized AI tools--generates causally coherent, MES-shaped data.<n>The framework provides a reusable data layer for discrete manufacturing AI validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T21:36:05Z)
• Towards Multi-Agent Autonomous Reasoning in Hydrodynamics [0.06999740786886537]
  We present a multi-agent system (MAS) prototype for hydrodynamics in which specialized agents are coordinated through a Layer Execution Graph (LEG)<n>A planner agent constructs query-specific execution topologies from natural-language routings that capture domain knowledge without hard-coding it as rigid control logic.<n>A reporter agent synthesizes the final response, while the runtime logs provenance for every tool invocation to support auditability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-01T21:17:55Z)
• UniToolCall: Unifying Tool-Use Representation, Data, and Evaluation for LLM Agents [22.52508596251479]
  We present UniToolCall, a unified framework for tool learning that standardizes the entire pipeline from construction and dataset generation to evaluation.<n>We convert 7 public benchmarks into a unified Query-Action--Observation-Answer (QAOA) representation with fine-grained evaluation at the function-call, turn, and conversation levels.<n>Under the Anchoror-heavy Hybrid-20 setting, achieves 93.0% single-turn Strict Precision, outperforming commercial models including GPT, Gemini, and Claude.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T14:43:47Z)
• LLM-based Schema-Guided Extraction and Validation of Missing-Person Intelligence from Heterogeneous Data Sources [0.7734726150561088]
  Missing-person and child-safety investigations rely on heterogeneous case documents, including structured forms, bulletin-style posters, and narrative web profiles.<n>Variations in layout, terminology, and data quality impede rapid triage, large-scale analysis, and search-planning.<n>This paper introduces the Guardian Pack, an AI-driven parsing and normalization pipeline that transforms multi-source investigative documents into a unified, schema-compliant representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T01:35:56Z)
• AIDABench: AI Data Analytics Benchmark [62.45908988324612]
  AIDABench is a benchmark for evaluating AI systems on complex data analytics tasks in an end-to-end manner.<n>AIDABench encompasses 600+ diverse document analysis tasks across three core capability dimensions: question answering, data visualization, and file generation.<n>We evaluate 11 state-of-the-art models on AIDABench, spanning both proprietary (e.g., Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 3 Pro Preview) and open-source (e.g., Qwen3-Max-2026-01-23-Thinking) families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T08:58:05Z)
• Machine Learning as a Tool (MLAT): A Framework for Integrating Statistical ML Models as Callable Tools within LLM Agent Workflows [0.152622865871084]
  We introduce Machine Learning as a Tool (MLAT), a design pattern in which pre-trained statistical machine learning models are exposed as callable tools within large language model (LLM) agent.<n>Unlike conventional pipelines that treat ML inference as a static preprocessing step, MLAT positions the model as a first-class tool alongside web search, database queries, and APIs.<n>We present PitchCraft, a pilot production system that converts discovery call recordings into professional proposals with ML-predicted pricing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-15T20:00:28Z)
• ARIAL: An Agentic Framework for Document VQA with Precise Answer Localization [1.580774794371876]
  We present ARIAL, a framework that orchestrates specialized tools to achieve both precise answer extraction and reliable spatial grounding.<n>We evaluate ARIAL on four benchmarks (DocVQA, FUNSD, CORD, and SROIE) using both textual accuracy (ANLS) and spatial precision.<n>Our work demonstrates how agentic orchestration of specialized tools can simultaneously improve performance and interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-22T21:09:28Z)
• AlphaApollo: Orchestrating Foundation Models and Professional Tools into a Self-Evolving System for Deep Agentic Reasoning [110.57865233597762]
  We present AlphaApollo, a self-evolving agentic reasoning system.<n>It aims to address two bottlenecks in foundation model (FM) reasoning-limited model-intrinsic capacity and unreliable test-time computation.<n>AlphaApollo orchestrates multiple models with professional tools to enable deliberate, verifiable reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T15:42:24Z)
• SOPBench: Evaluating Language Agents at Following Standard Operating Procedures and Constraints [59.645885492637845]
  SOPBench is an evaluation pipeline that transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions.<n>Our approach transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions and requires agents to call these functions based on natural language SOP descriptions.<n>We evaluate 18 leading models, and results show the task is challenging even for top-tier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T17:53:02Z)
• ToolACE: Winning the Points of LLM Function Calling [139.07157814653638]
  ToolACE is an automatic agentic pipeline designed to generate accurate, complex, and diverse tool-learning data.<n>We demonstrate that models trained on our synthesized data, even with only 8B parameters, achieve state-of-the-art performance on the Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T03:19:56Z)
• DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language Models [50.36636396660163]
  We present DiscoveryBench, the first comprehensive benchmark that formalizes the multi-step process of data-driven discovery. Our benchmark contains 264 tasks collected across 6 diverse domains, such as sociology and engineering. Our benchmark, thus, illustrates the challenges in autonomous data-driven discovery and serves as a valuable resource for the community to make progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T18:58:22Z)
• Self-Prompting Large Language Models for Zero-Shot Open-Domain QA [67.08732962244301]
  Open-Domain Question Answering (ODQA) aims to answer questions without explicitly providing background documents. This task becomes notably challenging in a zero-shot setting where no data is available to train tailored retrieval-reader models. We propose a Self-Prompting framework to explicitly utilize the massive knowledge encoded in the parameters of Large Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-16T18:23:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.