Generative-AI and the transformation of workforce. A job postings-driven analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00843v1
- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 17:02:43 GMT
- Title: Generative-AI and the transformation of workforce. A job postings-driven analysis
- Abstract summary: This paper investigates how generative-artificial intelligence AI is reshaping job requirements, skill compositions and sectoral dynamics across global labor markets.<n>It examines the evolving frequency and framing of AI-related competencies in job postings, exploring whether generative-AI functions primarily as an augmentative or substitutive force in the workplace.
- Score: 7.765662835417495
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper investigates how generative-artificial intelligence AI is reshaping job requirements, skill compositions and sectoral dynamics across global labor markets. It examines the evolving frequency and framing of AI-related competencies in job postings, exploring whether generative-AI functions primarily as an augmentative or substitutive force in the workplace. A large-scale, multi-source corpus of over 150,000 English-language job postings 2018-2025 is compiled from twelve open-access datasets and one public API. The analytical framework integrates lexical skill extraction, semantic framing, topic modeling, BERTopic, LDA, KMeans, and time-series forecasting ARIMA. Skill mentions are categorized into five dimensions: AI_Data, Routine, Soft_Meta, Domain_Specific and Leadership, while cross sectoral analyses and correlation matrices quantify interdependencies between competencies. Sentence-transformer embeddings and cosine similarity are used to compute a Framing Index, distinguishing augmentation- versus automation-oriented discourse. Investigating job postings, our research contributes a replicable, data driven methodology for mapping the diffusion of AI related skills across industries and time. Results reveal a sharp post-2021 increase in AI-related skill mentions: prompt engineering, fine-tuning and model validation, accompanied by a decline in routine tasks: data entry and manual coding. Forecasts suggest sustained growth in AI_Data and Soft_Meta skills through 2025, signaling a structural convergence toward hybrid human-AI expertise as a new foundation of employability.
Related papers
- When Does AI Augment Work? A Workflow-Level Framework for Human-Agent Collaboration [78.16115745870405]
We aim to characterise the value of artificial intelligence in the workplace.<n>Current studies largely measure this value in terms of the current automation capabilities and public adoption of AI.<n>To account for this, we must expand the scope of our analysis beyond atomised tasks of today.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-11T06:29:34Z) - The Context Access Divide: Interaction-Level Architecture as a Complementary Dimension of Agentic Inequality [0.0]
Two users with nominally equivalent AI access may experience qualitatively different AI utility.<n>For knowledge-intensive workers whose intellectual capital spans tens of thousands of files, the Context Access Divide (CAD) constitutes a qualitative threshold in AI usefulness.<n>We propose contextuality as a dimension of AI-mediated inequality that complements, but is not reducible to, the Sharp et al. framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-09T13:53:40Z) - AI Co-Scientist for Ranking: Discovering Novel Search Ranking Models alongside LLM-based AI Agents with Cloud Computing Access [60.37646376282544]
We present an AI Co-Scientist framework that automates the full search ranking research pipeline.<n>This is the first study in the ranking community to utilize an AI Co-Scientist framework for algorithmic research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T09:29:08Z) - The AI Roles Continuum: Blurring the Boundary Between Research and Engineering [0.0]
We propose a framework in which Research Scientists, Research Engineers, Applied Scientists, and Machine Learning Engineers occupy overlapping positions rather than discrete categories.<n>We show that core competencies such as distributed systems design, large-scale training and optimization, rigorous experimentation, and publication-minded inquiry are now broadly shared across titles.<n>Treating roles as fluid rather than siloed shortens research-to-production loops, improves iteration velocity, and strengthens organizational learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-31T05:00:58Z) - What's the next frontier for Data-centric AI? Data Savvy Agents [71.76058707995398]
We argue that data-savvy capabilities should be a top priority in the design of agentic systems.<n>We propose four key capabilities to realize this vision: Proactive data acquisition, Sophisticated data processing, Interactive test data synthesis, and Continual adaptation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-02T17:09:29Z) - AI, Humans, and Data Science: Optimizing Roles Across Workflows and the Workforce [0.0]
We consider the potential and limitation of analytic, generative, and agentic AI to augment data scientists or take on tasks traditionally done by human analysts and researchers.<n>Just as earlier eras of survey analysis created issues when the increased ease of using statistical software allowed researchers to conduct analyses they did not fully understand, the new AI tools may create similar but larger risks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-15T17:59:06Z) - Graphs Meet AI Agents: Taxonomy, Progress, and Future Opportunities [117.49715661395294]
Data structurization can play a promising role by transforming intricate and disorganized data into well-structured forms.<n>This survey presents a first systematic review of how graphs can empower AI agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-22T12:59:12Z) - Are Large Language Models Ready for Business Integration? A Study on Generative AI Adoption [0.6144680854063939]
This research examines the readiness of other Large Language Models (LLMs) such as Google Gemini for potential business applications.<n>A dataset of 42,654 reviews from distinct Disneyland branches was employed.<n>Results presented a spectrum of responses, including 75% successful simplifications, 25% errors, and instances of model self-reference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-28T21:01:22Z) - Converging Paradigms: The Synergy of Symbolic and Connectionist AI in LLM-Empowered Autonomous Agents [55.63497537202751]
Article explores the convergence of connectionist and symbolic artificial intelligence (AI)
Traditionally, connectionist AI focuses on neural networks, while symbolic AI emphasizes symbolic representation and logic.
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) highlight the potential of connectionist architectures in handling human language as a form of symbols.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-11T14:00:53Z) - Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed
on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach.
Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes.
We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z) - A curated, ontology-based, large-scale knowledge graph of artificial
intelligence tasks and benchmarks [4.04540578484476]
Intelligence Task Ontology and Knowledge Graph (ITO) is a comprehensive resource on artificial intelligence tasks, benchmark results and performance metrics.
ITO is a richly structured and manually curated resource on artificial intelligence tasks, benchmark results and performance metrics.
The goal of ITO is to enable precise and network-based analyses of the global landscape of AI tasks and capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-04T13:25:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.