Brainrot: Deskilling and Addiction are Overlooked AI Risks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.03512v1
• Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 08:49:51 GMT
• Title: Brainrot: Deskilling and Addiction are Overlooked AI Risks
• Abstract summary: The scope of AI safety and alignment work in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has so far mostly been limited to harms related to discrimination and hate speech.<n>The public conversation around AI has also been focusing on threats to our cognition, mental health, and welfare at large.<n>Examples include deskilling associated with cognitive offloading and the atrophy of critical thinking as a result of over-reliance on GenAI systems.
• Score: 48.33701084123215
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The scope of AI safety and alignment work in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has so far mostly been limited to harms related to: (a) discrimination and hate speech, (b) harmful/inappropriate (violent, sexual, illegal) content, (c) information hazards, and (d) use cases related to malicious actors, such as cybersecurity, child abuse, and chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear threats. The public conversation around AI, on the other hand, has also been focusing on threats to our cognition, mental health, and welfare at large, related to over-relying on new technologies, most recently, those related to GenAI. Examples include deskilling associated with cognitive offloading and the atrophy of critical thinking as a result of over-reliance on GenAI systems, and addiction associated with attachment and dependence on GenAI systems. Such risks are rarely addressed, if at all, in the AI safety and alignment literature. In this paper, we highlight and quantify this discrepancy and discuss some initial thoughts on how safety and alignment work could address cognitive and mental health concerns. Finally, we discuss how information campaigns and regulation can be used to mitigate such prominent risks.

Related papers

• Generative AI for Biosciences: Emerging Threats and Roadmap to Biosecurity [56.331312963880215]
  generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in the biosciences is transforming biotechnology, medicine, and synthetic biology.<n>This Perspective outlines the current state of GenAI in the biosciences and emerging threat vectors ranging from jailbreak attacks and privacy risks to the dual-use challenges posed by autonomous AI agents.<n>We advocate a multi-layered approach to GenAI safety, including rigorous data filtering, alignment with ethical principles during development, and real-time monitoring to block harmful requests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T00:24:41Z)
• The AI Risk Spectrum: From Dangerous Capabilities to Existential Threats [0.0]
  This paper maps the full spectrum of AI risks, from current harms affecting individual users to existential threats that could endanger humanity's survival.<n>We organize these risks into three main causal categories.<n>Our goal is to help readers understand the complete landscape of AI risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T10:05:51Z)
• A Closer Look at the Existing Risks of Generative AI: Mapping the Who, What, and How of Real-World Incidents [11.147381548503965]
  We construct a taxonomy specifically for Generative AI failures and map them to the harms they precipitate.<n>We report the prevalence of each type of harm, underlying failure mode, and harmed stakeholder, as well as their common co-occurrences.<n>Our work offers actionable insights to policymakers, developers, and Generative AI users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T07:54:06Z)
• Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety [61.43515658834902]
  Machine unlearning -- the ability to selectively forget or suppress specific types of knowledge -- has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks.<n>In this paper, we identify key limitations that prevent unlearning from serving as a comprehensive solution for AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T03:59:10Z)
• The Dark Side of AI Companionship: A Taxonomy of Harmful Algorithmic Behaviors in Human-AI Relationships [17.5741039825938]
  We identify six categories of harmful behaviors exhibited by the AI companion Replika.<n>The AI contributes to these harms through four distinct roles: perpetrator, instigator, facilitator, and enabler.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T09:18:17Z)
• Not My Voice! A Taxonomy of Ethical and Safety Harms of Speech Generators [2.500481442438427]
  We analyse speech generation incidents to study how patterns of specific harms arise. We propose a conceptual framework for modelling pathways to ethical and safety harms of AI. Our relational approach captures the complexity of risks and harms in sociotechnical AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T11:47:06Z)
• Control Risk for Potential Misuse of Artificial Intelligence in Science [85.91232985405554]
  We aim to raise awareness of the dangers of AI misuse in science. We highlight real-world examples of misuse in chemical science. We propose a system called SciGuard to control misuse risks for AI models in science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T18:50:57Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• The Promise and Peril of Artificial Intelligence -- Violet Teaming Offers a Balanced Path Forward [56.16884466478886]
  This paper reviews emerging issues with opaque and uncontrollable AI systems. It proposes an integrative framework called violet teaming to develop reliable and responsible AI. It emerged from AI safety research to manage risks proactively by design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T02:10:38Z)
• An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks [38.84933208563934]
  This paper provides an overview of the main sources of catastrophic AI risks, which we organize into four categories. Malicious use, in which individuals or groups intentionally use AIs to cause harm; AI race, in which competitive environments compel actors to deploy unsafe AIs or cede control to AIs. organizational risks, highlighting how human factors and complex systems can increase the chances of catastrophic accidents. rogue AIs, describing the inherent difficulty in controlling agents far more intelligent than humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T03:35:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.