What if AI systems weren't chatbots?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07896v1
- Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 15:40:18 GMT
- Title: What if AI systems weren't chatbots?
- Abstract summary: We show how treating AI primarily as conversational assistants has extensive structural downsides.<n>We examine broader societal effects, including labor displacement, concentration of economic power, and increased environmental costs.
- Score: 8.421028777254135
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The rapid convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) toward conversational chatbot interfaces marks a critical moment for the industry. This paper argues that the chatbot paradigm is not a neutral interface choice, but a dominant sociotechnical configuration whose widespread adoption reshapes social, economic, legal, and environmental systems. We examine how treating AI primarily as conversational assistants has extensive structural downsides. We show how chatbot-based systems often fail to adequately meet user needs, particularly in complex or high-stakes contexts, while projecting confidence and authority. We further analyze how the normalization of chatbot-mediated interaction alters patterns of work, learning, and decision-making, contributing to deskilling, homogenization of knowledge, and shifting expectations of expertise. Finally, we examine broader societal effects, including labor displacement, concentration of economic power, and increased environmental costs driven by sustained investment in large-scale chatbot infrastructures. While acknowledging legitimate benefits, we argue that the current trajectory of AI development reflects specific value choices that prioritize conversational generality over domain specificity, accountability, and long-term social sustainability. We conclude by outlining alternative directions for AI development and governance that move beyond one-size-fits-all chatbots, emphasizing pluralistic system design, task-specific tools, and institutional safeguards to mitigate social and economic harm.
Related papers
- From Chatbot to Digital Colleague: The Paradigm Shift Toward Persistent Autonomous AI [74.72113315839412]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are undergoing a fundamental transformation into integrated AI systems capable of reasoning, memory, and self-improvement.<n>We conceptualize this transition as a shift from episodic to Digital Colleague: from conversational answers to persistent work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-12T14:33:55Z) - Resisting Humanization: Ethical Front-End Design Choices in AI for Sensitive Contexts [1.1565654851982565]
We argue that humanization in AI front-end design is a value-driven choice that profoundly shapes users' mental models.<n>We discuss two AI systems developed by Chayn, a nonprofit organization supporting survivors of gender-based violence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-25T22:39:16Z) - Chaplains' Reflections on the Design and Usage of AI for Conversational Care [18.442670569768875]
Much of everyday emotional support needs occur in non-clinical contexts.<n>We examine how chaplains perceive and engage with conversational AI.<n>Our analysis reveals how chaplains perceive their pastoral care duties.<n>This perspective informs design aimed at supporting well-being in non-clinical contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-03T21:04:49Z) - Chatbot Deployment Considerations for Application-Agnostic Human-Machine Dialogues [0.0]
This paper aims to shed light on basic, elemental, considerations that technologists must consider.<n>By looking at this case-study, we aim to call for consideration of societal values as a paramount factor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-30T22:46:09Z) - Advancing Social Intelligence in AI Agents: Technical Challenges and Open Questions [67.60397632819202]
Building socially-intelligent AI agents (Social-AI) is a multidisciplinary, multimodal research goal.
We identify a set of underlying technical challenges and open questions for researchers across computing communities to advance Social-AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-17T02:57:42Z) - Socially Pertinent Robots in Gerontological Healthcare [81.67026771075037]
This paper is an attempt to partially answer the question, via two waves of experiments with patients and companions in a day-care gerontological facility in Paris with a full-sized humanoid robot endowed with social and conversational interaction capabilities.<n>Overall, the users are receptive to this technology, especially when the robot perception and action skills are robust to environmental clutter and flexible to handle a plethora of different interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-11T08:43:37Z) - Developing generative AI chatbots conceptual framework for higher education [0.0]
This study aims to comprehend the implications of AIgeneratives on higher education and pinpoint critical elements for their efficacious implementation.
The results demonstrate how much AI chatbots can do to improve student engagement, streamline the educational process, and support administrative and research duties.
But there are also clear difficulties, such as unfavorable student sentiments, doubts about the veracity of material produced by AI, and unease and nervousness with new technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-28T10:40:26Z) - Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic
Systems [67.01132165581667]
We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components.
We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z) - Expanding the Set of Pragmatic Considerations in Conversational AI [0.26206189324400636]
We discuss several pragmatic limitations of current conversational AI systems.
We label our complaints as "Turing Test Triggers" (TTTs)
We develop a taxonomy of pragmatic considerations intended to identify what pragmatic competencies a conversational AI system requires.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-27T19:21:50Z) - Human-AI Coevolution [48.74579595505374]
Coevolution AI is a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other.
This paper introduces Coevolution AI as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-23T18:10:54Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - Put Chatbot into Its Interlocutor's Shoes: New Framework to Learn
Chatbot Responding with Intention [55.77218465471519]
This paper proposes an innovative framework to train chatbots to possess human-like intentions.
Our framework included a guiding robot and an interlocutor model that plays the role of humans.
We examined our framework using three experimental setups and evaluate the guiding robot with four different metrics to demonstrated flexibility and performance advantages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-30T15:24:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.