Agent-First Tool API: A Semantic Interface Paradigm for Enterprise AI Agent Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10555v1
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 13:30:43 GMT
- Title: Agent-First Tool API: A Semantic Interface Paradigm for Enterprise AI Agent Systems
- Abstract summary: We propose the Agent-First Tool API paradigm, which decomposes tool interactions into search, resolve, preview, execute, verify, and recover phases.<n>The paradigm is implemented and validated in a production multi-tenant platform serving 85 registered tools across 6 business domains.
- Score: 1.3259123126940986
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: As AI agents transition from research prototypes to enterprise production systems, the tool interfaces they consume remain rooted in human-oriented CRUD paradigms. This paper identifies five fundamental architectural mismatches between conventional APIs and autonomous agent requirements: exact-identifier dependence, rendering-oriented responses, single-shot interaction assumptions, user-equivalent authorization, and opaque error semantics. We propose the Agent-First Tool API paradigm, comprising three integrated mechanisms: (1) a Six-Verb Semantic Protocol that decomposes tool interactions into search, resolve, preview, execute, verify, and recover phases; (2) a Normalized Tool Contract (NTC) providing structured decision-support metadata including confidence scores, evidence chains, and suggested next actions; and (3) a dual-layer governance pipeline combining static capability policies with dynamic risk escalation. The paradigm is implemented and validated in a production multi-tenant SaaS platform serving 85 registered tools across 6 business domains. Comparative experiments on 50 real operational tasks demonstrate that Agent-First APIs achieve 88% end-to-end task success rate versus 64% for optimized CRUD baselines (+37.5%), while reducing required human interventions by 72.7% and improving autonomous error recovery by 5.8x. We establish that the paradigm is orthogonal and complementary to transport-layer standards such as MCP, operating as the semantic application layer above existing tool discovery and invocation protocols.
Related papers
- Authorization Architectures for Tool-Using AI Agents [0.0]
Trustworthy human-AI systems require that every consequential agent action be traceable to a human principal.<n>This review introduces a principal hierarchy spanning human user, operator/deployer, orchestrator agent, sub-agent, and tool endpoint as an organizing framework.<n>We propose seven structural requirements, derive a four-layer reference architecture, apply the requirements to three deployable reference configurations, and identify runtime enforcement and aggregation bounds as the principal unresolved gaps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-14T17:21:22Z) - DPIAgent: Divide, Protocol, Isolate for Agentic Reproduction Test Generation [31.816679197888366]
DPIAgent is a structured agentic framework built on three principles.<n>It Divides the task into single-objective phases of defect exploration and test generation.<n>It enforces a handoff Protocol that records the diagnosis and test plan, preventing context loss.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-24T14:51:15Z) - AgentCompass: A Unified Evaluation Infrastructure for Agent Capabilities [55.23913617185508]
Agent is an open-source, lightweight, and infrastructure for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs)-based agents.<n>It organizes the evaluation process around three independent components, namely Benchmark, Harness and Environment.<n>It features a fault-tolerant runtime and comprehensive trajectory analysis tools to transparently diagnose failure modes like reward-hacking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-15T11:11:17Z) - MetaCogAgent: A Metacognitive Multi-Agent LLM Framework with Self-Aware Task Delegation [11.486913474115402]
We propose MetaCogAgent, a multi-agent large language model (LLM) framework where each agent is equipped with a Metacognitive Self-Assessment Unit.<n>We show that MetaCogAgent achieves 82.4% task accuracy while using 5% fewer API calls than AutoGen and 34% fewer than ensemble voting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-17T07:12:04Z) - AgentProcessBench: Diagnosing Step-Level Process Quality in Tool-Using Agents [50.481033105867205]
We introduce AgentProcessBench, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating step-level effectiveness in realistic, tool-augmented trajectories.<n>The benchmark comprises 1,000 diverse trajectories and 8,509 human-labeled step annotations with 89.1% inter-annotator agreement.<n>It features a ternary labeling scheme to capture exploration and an error propagation rule to reduce labeling ambiguity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-15T16:13:58Z) - Semantic Consensus: Process-Aware Conflict Detection and Resolution for Enterprise Multi-Agent LLM Systems [0.0]
Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems are rapidly emerging as the dominant architecture for enterprise AI automation.<n>Production deployments exhibit failure rates between 41% and 86.7%, with nearly 79% of failures originating from specification and coordination issues.<n>We propose the Semantic Consensus Framework (SCF), a process-aware comprising six components.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-13T14:55:38Z) - Jenius Agent: Towards Experience-Driven Accuracy Optimization in Real-World Scenarios [0.9069311779417014]
This paper introduces an agent framework grounded in real-world practical experience.<n>An end-to-end framework named Jenius-Agent has been integrated with three key optimizations.<n>Experiments show a 20 percent improvement in task accuracy, along with a reduced token cost, response latency, and invocation failures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-05T07:35:12Z) - Towards Efficient Agents: A Co-Design of Inference Architecture and System [66.59916327634639]
This paper presents AgentInfer, a unified framework for end-to-end agent acceleration.<n>We decompose the problem into four synergistic components: AgentCollab, AgentSched, AgentSAM, and AgentCompress.<n>Experiments on the BrowseComp-zh and DeepDiver benchmarks demonstrate that through the synergistic collaboration of these methods, AgentInfer reduces ineffective token consumption by over 50%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-20T12:06:13Z) - Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems [79.64446272302287]
We formalize a definition for agent evaluation and characterize scaling laws as the interplay between agent quantity, coordination structure, modelic, and task properties.<n>We derive a predictive model using coordination metrics, that cross-validated R2=0, enabling prediction on unseen task domains.<n>We identify three effects: (1) a tool-coordination trade-off: under fixed computational budgets, tool-heavy tasks suffer disproportionately from multi-agent overhead, and (2) a capability saturation: coordination yields diminishing or negative returns once single-agent baselines exceed 45%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-09T06:52:21Z) - Towards Engineering Multi-Agent LLMs: A Protocol-Driven Approach [13.760107452858044]
This paper introduces Software Engineering Multi-Agent Protocol (SEMAP), a protocol-layer methodology that instantiates three core SE design principles for multi-agents.<n>In code development, it achieves up to a 69.6% reduction in total failures function-level development and 56.7% for deployment-level development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-14T03:49:30Z) - OmniEAR: Benchmarking Agent Reasoning in Embodied Tasks [52.87238755666243]
We present OmniEAR, a framework for evaluating how language models reason about physical interactions, tool usage, and multi-agent coordination in embodied tasks.<n>We model continuous physical properties and complex spatial relationships across 1,500 scenarios spanning household and industrial domains.<n>Our systematic evaluation reveals severe performance degradation when models must reason from constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-07T17:54:15Z) - SOPBench: Evaluating Language Agents at Following Standard Operating Procedures and Constraints [59.645885492637845]
SOPBench is an evaluation pipeline that transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions.<n>Our approach transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions and requires agents to call these functions based on natural language SOP descriptions.<n>We evaluate 18 leading models, and results show the task is challenging even for top-tier models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-11T17:53:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.