Into the Unknown: Accounting for Missing Demographic Data when Mitigating Ad Delivery Skew

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12273v1
• Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 15:36:21 GMT
• Title: Into the Unknown: Accounting for Missing Demographic Data when Mitigating Ad Delivery Skew
• Abstract summary: Online advertising platforms use algorithmic systems to power the process of matching ads to users, termed ad delivery.<n>Prior audits have demonstrated that ad delivery can be skewed by demographic attributes.<n>This under-delivery raises a serious concern in the context of ads promoting public services.
• Score: 2.904614754159118
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Online advertising platforms use algorithmic systems to power the process of matching ads to users, termed ad delivery. Prior audits have demonstrated that ad delivery can be skewed by demographic attributes, such that ads are systematically under-delivered to certain groups despite advertiser intent to reach groups proportionally. This under-delivery raises a serious concern in the context of ads promoting public services, which might prevent certain groups of individuals from accessing information about resources on the basis of their demographic identity. In the absence of platform-provided solutions to skewed ad delivery, advertisers can counteract skew by targeting demographic groups directly. However, direct targeting excludes users whose demographics the platform cannot infer ("unknown users") if advertising platforms do not provide a way to target unknown users directly, as is the case on Google Ads. We collaborate with a state-level government agency to reduce gender-based skew in ad delivery with an intervention that accounts for unknown users while incorporating gender-based targeting. In particular, we design a budget split intervention that directly incorporates unknown users and targets users with Google-inferred gender labels (i.e., male, female). We find that this intervention is a valuable approach to addressing ad delivery skew without excluding unknown users, and serves as a middle ground in the trade-off between higher costs (from more granular demographic targeting) and skew (from ignoring demographics entirely). This approach is responsive to the needs of real-world, resource-constrained advertisers who are committed to the equitable distribution of public service outreach via online advertising. We conclude with recommendations for government advertisers, online advertising platforms, and researchers.

Related papers

• Reckless Designs and Broken Promises: Privacy Implications of Targeted Interactive Advertisements on Social Media Platforms [3.956142896254297]
  Social media platforms TikTok, Facebook and Instagram allow third-parties to run targeted advertising campaigns on sensitive attributes in-platform.<n>We find that this platform-level design choice creates a privacy loophole such that advertisers can view the profiles of those who interact with their ads.<n>This behavior is in contradiction to the promises made by the platforms to hide user data from advertisers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T02:27:45Z)
• External Evaluation of Discrimination Mitigation Efforts in Meta's Ad Delivery [47.418845064441605]
  We show that the Variance Reduction System (VRS) implemented by Meta does not meaningfully improve access to opportunities for individuals.<n>We then conduct experiments to evaluate VRS with real-world ads, and show that while VRS does reduce variance, it also raises advertiser costs.<n>We show our approach outperforms VRS by both increasing ad exposure for users from all groups and reducing cost to advertisers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T19:29:26Z)
• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Why am I Still Seeing This: Measuring the Effectiveness Of Ad Controls and Explanations in AI-Mediated Ad Targeting Systems [55.02903075972816]
  We evaluate the effectiveness of Meta's "See less" ad control and the actionability of ad targeting explanations following the shift to AI-mediated targeting. We find that utilizing the "See less" ad control for the topics we study does not significantly reduce the number of ads shown by Meta on these topics. We find that the majority of ad targeting explanations for local ads made no reference to location-specific targeting criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T18:03:11Z)
• Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
  We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising. It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images. We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z)
• Exploring the Online Micro-targeting Practices of Small, Medium, and Large Businesses [0.0]
  The European Commission plans to restrict or ban some targeting functionalities in the new European Democracy Action Plan act. We take a first step by understanding who is advertising on Facebook and how they use the targeting functionalities. We found that only 32% of small and medium-sized businesses and 30% of large-sized businesses micro-target at least one of their ads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T14:16:54Z)
• Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job Ads [70.02478301291264]
  We develop a new methodology for black-box auditing of algorithms for discrimination in the delivery of job advertisements. Our first contribution is to identify the distinction between skew in ad delivery due to protected categories such as gender or race. Second, we develop an auditing methodology that distinguishes between skew explainable by differences in qualifications from other factors. Third, we apply our proposed methodology to two prominent targeted advertising platforms for job ads: Facebook and LinkedIn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T17:38:36Z)
• An Empirical Study of In-App Advertising Issues Based on Large Scale App Review Analysis [67.58267006314415]
  We present a large-scale analysis on ad-related user feedback from App Store and Google Play. From a statistical analysis of 36,309 ad-related reviews, we find that users care most about the number of unique ads and ad display frequency during usage. Some ad issue types are addressed more quickly by developers than other ad issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-22T05:38:24Z)
• Targeted display advertising: the case of preferential attachment [5.144809478361603]
  We develop "domain-adaptation" approaches to address the challenge of predicting interested users for the partners with insufficient data. Our approaches readily adapt to the new campaign data by incremental fine-tuning, and hence work at varying points of a campaign.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-07T16:23:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.