Intelligence Impact Quotient (IIQ): A Framework for Measuring Organizational AI Impact

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14455v1
• Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 06:51:20 GMT
• Title: Intelligence Impact Quotient (IIQ): A Framework for Measuring Organizational AI Impact
• Abstract summary: The Intelligence Impact Quotient (IIQ) is a composite metric intended to quantify the depth to which AI systems are integrated into organizational work and their impact.<n>We produce a raw Intelligence Adoption Index (IAI) and a normalized 0-1000 IIQ index for comparison between heterogeneous users and units.<n>We show how the revised metric distinguishes between frequent low-leverage use, semantically repetitive prompting, and more autonomous, higher-consequence AI-assisted work.
• Score: 0.5218478348453993
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Intelligence Impact Quotient (IIQ) is a composite metric intended to quantify the depth to which AI systems are integrated into organizational work and their impact. Rather than treating access counts or aggregate token volume as sufficient evidence of impact, IIQ combines a novelty-weighted, time-decayed token stock with usage frequency, a grace-period recency gate, organizational leverage, task complexity, and autonomy. The formulation produces a raw Intelligence Adoption Index (IAI) and a normalized 0-1000 IIQ index for comparison between heterogeneous users and units. We also derive sub-daily update rules and a bounded interpretation layer for estimated efficiency and financial impact. The paper positions IIQ as a deployment-oriented measurement framework: a formal proposal for tracking AI embedding in workflows, not a direct measure of model capability or a substitute for causal productivity evaluation. Synthetic scenarios illustrate how the revised metric distinguishes between frequent low-leverage use, semantically repetitive prompting, and more autonomous, higher-consequence AI-assisted work.

Related papers

• The Context Access Divide: Interaction-Level Architecture as a Complementary Dimension of Agentic Inequality [0.0]
  Two users with nominally equivalent AI access may experience qualitatively different AI utility.<n>For knowledge-intensive workers whose intellectual capital spans tens of thousands of files, the Context Access Divide (CAD) constitutes a qualitative threshold in AI usefulness.<n>We propose contextuality as a dimension of AI-mediated inequality that complements, but is not reducible to, the Sharp et al. framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-09T13:53:40Z)
• Offloading Score: Measuring AI Reliance Through Counterfactual Workflows [70.84727355516559]
  We introduce offloading score, a measure of reliance that quantifies the fraction of cognitive effort offloaded to an AI tool.<n>We validate offloading score through intrinsic evaluations of metric validity, and a controlled user study.<n>We show that offloading score detects significantly higher reliance in time-constrained settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T05:44:31Z)
• Information-Theoretic Measures in AI: A Practical Decision Guide [0.0]
  Information-theoretic (IT) measures are ubiquitous in artificial intelligence.<n>This paper provides a practical decision framework for all seven measures.<n>We cover both AI/ML and decision-making agent application domains per measure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-26T14:00:22Z)
• Quality-Driven Agentic Reasoning for LLM-Assisted Software Design: Questions-of-Thoughts (QoT) as a Time-Series Self-QA Chain [0.0]
  We introduce Questions-of-Thoughts (QoT), a quality-driven inference-time scaffold that turns a user goal into an ordered sequence of engineering steps.<n>We evaluate QoT across three representative backend engineering domains: API Design, Data Communication, and File Systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-10T23:49:09Z)
• AI-NativeBench: An Open-Source White-Box Agentic Benchmark Suite for AI-Native Systems [52.65695508605237]
  We introduce AI-NativeBench, the first application-centric and white-box AI-Native benchmark suite grounded in Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Agent-to-Agent (A2A) standards.<n>By treating agentic spans as first-class citizens within distributed traces, our methodology enables granular analysis of engineering characteristics beyond simple capabilities.<n>This work provides the first systematic evidence to guide the transition from measuring model capability to engineering reliable AI-Native systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T11:32:07Z)
• Towards Efficient Agents: A Co-Design of Inference Architecture and System [66.59916327634639]
  This paper presents AgentInfer, a unified framework for end-to-end agent acceleration.<n>We decompose the problem into four synergistic components: AgentCollab, AgentSched, AgentSAM, and AgentCompress.<n>Experiments on the BrowseComp-zh and DeepDiver benchmarks demonstrate that through the synergistic collaboration of these methods, AgentInfer reduces ineffective token consumption by over 50%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-20T12:06:13Z)
• SelfAI: Building a Self-Training AI System with LLM Agents [79.10991818561907]
  SelfAI is a general multi-agent platform that combines a User Agent for translating high-level research objectives into standardized experimental configurations.<n>An Experiment Manager orchestrates parallel, fault-tolerant training across heterogeneous hardware while maintaining a structured knowledge base for continuous feedback.<n>Across regression, computer vision, scientific computing, medical imaging, and drug discovery benchmarks, SelfAI consistently achieves strong performance and reduces redundant trials.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-29T09:18:39Z)
• AgenticIQA: An Agentic Framework for Adaptive and Interpretable Image Quality Assessment [69.06977852423564]
  Image quality assessment (IQA) reflects both the quantification and interpretation of perceptual quality rooted in the human visual system.<n>AgenticIQA decomposes IQA into four subtasks -- distortion detection, distortion analysis, tool selection, and tool execution.<n>To support training and evaluation, we introduce AgenticIQA-200K, a large-scale instruction dataset tailored for IQA agents, and AgenticIQA-Eval, the first benchmark for assessing the planning, execution, and summarization capabilities of VLM-based IQA agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T09:37:01Z)
• QCS-ADME: Quantum Circuit Search for Drug Property Prediction with Imbalanced Data and Regression Adaptation [11.101993017609246]
  We propose a novel training-free scoring mechanism to evaluate QML circuit performance on imbalanced classification and regression tasks.<n>Our mechanism demonstrates significant correlation between scoring metrics and test performance on imbalanced classification tasks.<n>This represents the first comprehensive approach to searching and evaluating QCS circuits specifically for regression applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T19:29:04Z)
• Improving Text Matching in E-Commerce Search with A Rationalizable, Intervenable and Fast Entity-Based Relevance Model [78.80174696043021]
  We propose a novel model called the Entity-Based Relevance Model (EBRM) The decomposition allows us to use a Cross-encoder QE relevance module for high accuracy. We also show that pretraining the QE module with auto-generated QE data from user logs can further improve the overall performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-01T15:44:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.