Can Visual Mamba Improve AI-Generated Image Detection? An In-Depth Investigation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14799v1
• Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 13:09:16 GMT
• Title: Can Visual Mamba Improve AI-Generated Image Detection? An In-Depth Investigation
• Abstract summary: This study provides a systematic evaluation and comparative analysis of Vision Mamba models for AI-generated image detection.<n>We benchmark multiple Vision Mamba variants against representative CNNs, ViTs, and VLM-based detectors across diverse datasets and synthetic image sources.<n>Our findings highlight both the promise and current limitations of Vision Mamba as a component in systems designed to distinguish authentic from AI-generated visual content.
• Score: 11.638406459109945
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, computer vision has witnessed remarkable progress, fueled by the development of innovative architectures such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), diffusion-based architectures, Vision Transformers (ViTs), and, more recently, Vision-Language Models (VLMs). This progress has undeniably contributed to creating increasingly realistic and diverse visual content. However, such advancements in image generation also raise concerns about potential misuse in areas such as misinformation, identity theft, and threats to privacy and security. In parallel, Mamba-based architectures have emerged as versatile tools for a range of image analysis tasks, including classification, segmentation, medical imaging, object detection, and image restoration, in this rapidly evolving field. However, their potential for identifying AI-generated images remains relatively unexplored compared to established techniques. This study provides a systematic evaluation and comparative analysis of Vision Mamba models for AI-generated image detection. We benchmark multiple Vision Mamba variants against representative CNNs, ViTs, and VLM-based detectors across diverse datasets and synthetic image sources, focusing on key metrics such as accuracy, efficiency, and generalizability across diverse image types and generative models. Through this comprehensive analysis, we aim to elucidate Vision Mamba's strengths and limitations relative to established methodologies in terms of applicability, accuracy, and efficiency in detecting AI-generated images. Overall, our findings highlight both the promise and current limitations of Vision Mamba as a component in systems designed to distinguish authentic from AI-generated visual content. This research is crucial for enhancing detection in an age where distinguishing between real and AI-generated content is a major challenge.

Related papers

• LHSDet: High-Resolution AI-Generated Image Detection via Visual Question Answering [9.47286721599147]
  We propose a novel high-resolution AI-generated image detector, termed LHSDet.<n>We formulate the AI-generated image detection task as a Visual Question Answering problem.<n>We use a fine-tuned vision-language framework to fully exploit the complementary information between visual and textual modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T02:13:33Z)
• Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Image Detection [23.358538027776877]
  Increasing realism of AI-generated images makes their detection a pressing concern for researchers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders.<n>We present the findings of the Defactify 4.0 workshop, which introduced the Counter Turing Test (CT2) for AI-Generated Image Detection.<n>The competition consisted of two key tasks: (1) binary classification of images as either AI-generated or real and (2) identification of the specific generative model responsible for an AI-generated image.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T06:32:55Z)
• How Well Do Models Follow Visual Instructions? VIBE: A Systematic Benchmark for Visual Instruction-Driven Image Editing [56.60465182650588]
  We introduce three-level interaction hierarchy that captures deictic grounding, morphological manipulation, and causal reasoning.<n>We propose a robust LMM-as-a-judge evaluation framework with task-specific metrics to enable scalable and fine-grained assessment.<n>We find that proprietary models exhibit early-stage visual instruction-following capabilities and consistently outperform open-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T09:24:45Z)
• Provenance of AI-Generated Images: A Vector Similarity and Blockchain-based Approach [3.632189127068905]
  We propose an embedding-based AI image detection framework to distinguish AI-generated images from real (human-created) ones.<n>Our methodology is built on the hypothesis that AI-generated images demonstrate closer embedding proximity to other AI-generated content.<n>Our results confirm that moderate to high perturbations minimally impact the embedding signatures, with perturbed images maintaining close similarity matches to their original versions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T00:49:56Z)
• Bridging the Gap Between Ideal and Real-world Evaluation: Benchmarking AI-Generated Image Detection in Challenging Scenarios [54.07895223545793]
  This paper introduces the Real-World Robustness dataset (RRDataset) for comprehensive evaluation of detection models across three dimensions.<n>RRDataset includes high-quality images from seven major scenarios.<n>We benchmarked 17 detectors and 10 vision-language models (VLMs) on RRDataset and conducted a large-scale human study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T06:15:52Z)
• FakeScope: Large Multimodal Expert Model for Transparent AI-Generated Image Forensics [66.14786900470158]
  We propose FakeScope, an expert multimodal model (LMM) tailored for AI-generated image forensics.<n>FakeScope identifies AI-synthetic images with high accuracy and provides rich, interpretable, and query-driven forensic insights.<n>FakeScope achieves state-of-the-art performance in both closed-ended and open-ended forensic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T16:12:48Z)
• M3-AGIQA: Multimodal, Multi-Round, Multi-Aspect AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment [65.3860007085689]
  M3-AGIQA is a comprehensive framework that enables more human-aligned, holistic evaluation of AI-generated images.<n>By aligning model outputs more closely with human judgment, M3-AGIQA delivers robust and interpretable quality scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T03:05:45Z)
• DAMamba: Vision State Space Model with Dynamic Adaptive Scan [51.81060691414399]
  State space models (SSMs) have recently garnered significant attention in computer vision.<n>We propose Dynamic Adaptive Scan (DAS), a data-driven method that adaptively allocates scanning orders and regions.<n>Based on DAS, we propose the vision backbone DAMamba, which significantly outperforms current state-of-the-art vision Mamba models in vision tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T08:12:47Z)
• Multi-Scale Transformer Architecture for Accurate Medical Image Classification [4.578375402082224]
  This study introduces an AI-driven skin lesion classification algorithm built on an enhanced Transformer architecture.<n>By integrating a multi-scale feature fusion mechanism and refining the self-attention process, the model effectively extracts both global and local features.<n>Performance evaluation on the ISIC 2017 dataset demonstrates that the improved Transformer surpasses established AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T08:22:25Z)
• D-Judge: How Far Are We? Assessing the Discrepancies Between AI-synthesized and Natural Images through Multimodal Guidance [19.760989919485894]
  We construct a large-scale multimodal dataset, D-ANI, comprising 5,000 natural images and over 440,000 AIGI samples.<n>We then introduce an AI-Natural Image Discrepancy assessment benchmark (D-Judge) to address the critical question: how far are AI-generated images (AIGIs) from truly realistic images?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-23T15:08:08Z)
• A Sanity Check for AI-generated Image Detection [49.08585395873425]
  We propose AIDE (AI-generated Image DEtector with Hybrid Features) to detect AI-generated images.<n>AIDE achieves +3.5% and +4.6% improvements to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T17:59:49Z)
• Improving Interpretability and Robustness for the Detection of AI-Generated Images [6.116075037154215]
  We analyze existing state-of-the-art AIGI detection methods based on frozen CLIP embeddings. We show how to interpret them, shedding light on how images produced by various AI generators differ from real ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T10:33:09Z)
• ASAP: Interpretable Analysis and Summarization of AI-generated Image Patterns at Scale [20.12991230544801]
  Generative image models have emerged as a promising technology to produce realistic images. There is growing demand to empower users to effectively discern and comprehend patterns of AI-generated images. We develop ASAP, an interactive visualization system that automatically extracts distinct patterns of AI-generated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T18:20:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.