Quantum Measurement without Ontology

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16101v1
• Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 15:54:08 GMT
• Title: Quantum Measurement without Ontology
• Abstract summary: No-go theorems show that measurement of quantum observables is typically created rather than revealed in a quantum measurement.<n>Other no-go theorems show that unitary quantum theory can generally neither explain nor even represent a unique recorded outcome.<n>Methodological norms inherent in quantum physical practice nevertheless institute the objectivity.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Measurement is an important scientific activity. In most of science, including classical physics, is may be understood as a way of finding out about the physical world and representing the results numerically. No-go theorems show that measurement of quantum observables is not like that: the recorded outcome is typically created rather than revealed in a quantum measurement, in which case there is no objective fact about the observable's prior value. Other no-go theorems show that unitary quantum theory can generally neither explain nor even represent a unique recorded outcome, thereby threatening that outcome's objectivity. Methodological norms inherent in quantum physical practice nevertheless institute the objectivity, not only of unique recorded outcomes of quantum measurements, but also of non-quantum features of the world that physicists and other scientists take their models to represent.

Related papers

• No Cloning of Quantum Ensembles [12.972500817229978]
  Modern quantum physics enables control of quantum systems at the level of individual trajectories, opening a new frontier that links quantum information theory, quantum many-body physics, and quantum thermodynamics.<n>Their characterization relies on measuring nonlinear properties of individual quantum states, a task tantamount to fine-grained cloning of a quantum ensemble.<n>Here, the fundamental laws governing the cloning of quantum ensembles are investigated.<n>Results establish new fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, reveal intrinsic trade-offs among sample complexity, computational complexity, and quantum measurements, and highlight the necessity of problem-specific strategies for probing measurement-induced quantum phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-26T06:24:03Z)
• A Pragmatist Understanding of Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  We can understand quantum mechanics by understanding how we have applied it.<n>When applied to a quantum state, quantum mechanics yields probabiities for physical events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T15:51:51Z)
• Modelling quantum measurements without superposition [39.146761527401424]
  We investigate whether sets of quantum measurements can be modelled by using only devices that are operationally classical.<n>This leads us to propose classical measurement models, which we show to be stronger than commutative measurements.<n>Our work sheds light on superposition as a resource for quantum measurement devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T15:27:27Z)
• Counterfactuals in Macroscopic Quantum Physics: Irreversibility, Measurement and Locality [0.0]
  We argue that measurement, irreversibility and locality can all appear to challenge the universality of quantum theory.<n>We find novel features of quantum thermodynamics relating to irreversibility, information erasure and coherence.<n>This reveals new ways of characterising the quantum information stored in entanglement and quantum branching structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T20:14:17Z)
• Limitations to Genuine Measurements in Ontological Models of Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  Given an ontological model of a quantum system, a "genuine measurement" means an experiment that determines the value of a beable, i.e., of a variable that, according to the model, has an actual value in nature before the experiment. We prove a theorem showing that in every ontological model, it is impossible to measure all beables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-11T14:10:44Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum Measurement Theory for Systems with Finite Dimensional State Spaces [0.0]
  We develop the theory in a deductive manner from the basic postulates for quantum mechanics. We derive an axiomatic characterization of all the physically realizable finite quantum measurements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T07:09:38Z)
• Scientific Objectivity and its Limits [0.0]
  Measurement outcomes provide data for a physical theory. Unless they are objective they support no objective scientific knowledge. Recent arguments purport to show that if quantum theory is universally applicable there is no such fact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-02T14:04:00Z)
• Do qubits dream of entangled sheep? Quantum measurement without classical output [0.0]
  We introduce an entirely quantum notion of measurement, called a sensation, to account for quantum agents that experience the world through quantum sensors. Sensations eschew probabilities and instead describe a deterministic flow of quantum information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-24T18:00:11Z)
• Cost of quantum entanglement simplified [13.683637401785505]
  We introduce an entanglement measure that has a precise information-theoretic meaning as the exact cost required to prepare an entangled state. Our results bring key insights into the fundamental entanglement structure of arbitrary quantum states, and they can be used directly to assess and quantify the entanglement produced in quantum-physical experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-28T14:36:23Z)
• Entropic Uncertainty Relations and the Quantum-to-Classical transition [77.34726150561087]
  We aim to shed some light on the quantum-to-classical transition as seen through the analysis of uncertainty relations. We employ entropic uncertainty relations to show that it is only by the inclusion of imprecision in our model of macroscopic measurements that we can prepare a system with two simultaneously well-defined quantities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T14:01:17Z)
• The Existence and Role of Quantum-State Noise [51.56484100374058]
  Key observation about quantum reality is that it often appears as if, at some moment, the probability of a quantum event becomes a definite outcome for us.<n>A careful analysis suggests, however, that what we perceive as a definite state -- the observed outcome of a quantum experiment -- is not strictly definite.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2010-05-02T09:33:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.