Do LLMs Know What Luxembourgish Borrows? Probing Lexical Neology in Low-Resource Multilingual Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21227v1
• Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 14:19:55 GMT
• Title: Do LLMs Know What Luxembourgish Borrows? Probing Lexical Neology in Low-Resource Multilingual Models
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for writing assistance in small contact languages.<n>This study examines borrowing as a form of lexical innovation in multilingual Luxembourgish data.
• Score: 0.533024001730262
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for writing assistance in small contact languages, yet it is unclear whether they respect community norms around lexical borrowing and neology. We introduce LexNeo-Bench, a 3{,}050-instance token-level benchmark derived from LuxBorrow, a large-scale Luxembourgish news corpus, where target tokens are labelled as native or as French, German, or English borrowings. Using this benchmark, we probe three multilingual LLMs across 34 prompt settings on two tasks: borrowing type classification and a binary lexical-innovation proxy (borrowing versus native). Without external context, models perform only slightly above chance on borrowing classification, so we construct a linguistic knowledge graph that encodes donor language, morphological patterns, and lexical analogues, and inject instance-specific subgraphs into the prompt. Knowledge-graph prompts raise borrowing classification accuracy from 25 -- 35\% up to 71 -- 81\% and largely close the gap between small and large models, while leaving neology detection difficult and sensitive to few-shot design. Our results show that lexicon-aware prompting is highly beneficial for robust borrowing judgments in low-resource contact languages and that lexical resources can serve as structured context for LLM evaluation. This study was carried out within the ENEOLI COST Action and examines borrowing as a form of lexical innovation in multilingual Luxembourgish data.

Related papers

• MameLoshnLM: Yiddish Language Model and Evaluation Benchmark [62.936233688546984]
  We present MameLoshnLM, the first open-source 8B- parameter language model built specifically for Yiddish.<n>Despite Yiddish's rich textual tradition, its limited digital presence and the scarcity of reliable evaluation resources have constrained progress in Yiddish language modeling.<n>Our results provide both a foundation for Yiddish NLP and a practical template for language model development in historically rich but digitally underrepresented languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T10:24:08Z)
• Multilingual and Cross-Lingual Citation Needed Detection on Wikipedia for Lower-Resource Languages [4.596698321408836]
  We introduce MCN, a multilingual CND corpus spanning 18 languages across three resource levels.<n>We conduct an extensive study of small decoder-based language models (SLMs)<n>Experiments show that SLMs fine-tuned with an encoder-style objective substantially outperform prompted LLMs across languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T10:47:22Z)
• LLM Probe: Evaluating LLMs for Low-Resource Languages [6.177998679139308]
  This paper presents a lexicon-based assessment framework designed to evaluate the linguistic skills of large language models (LLMs) in low-resource languages.<n>The framework analyzes models across four areas of language understanding: lexical alignment, part-of-speech recognition, morphosyntactic probing, and translation accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T10:03:38Z)
• LuxEmbedder: A Cross-Lingual Approach to Enhanced Luxembourgish Sentence Embeddings [8.839362558895594]
  Sentence embedding models rely heavily on parallel data, which can be scarce for many low-resource languages, including Luxembourgish.<n>This scarcity results in suboptimal performance of monolingual and cross-lingual sentence embedding models for these languages.<n>We present evidence suggesting that including low-resource languages in parallel training datasets can be more advantageous for other low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-04T14:02:12Z)
• Dictionary Insertion Prompting for Multilingual Reasoning on Multilingual Large Language Models [52.00446751692225]
  We present a novel and simple yet effective method called textbfDictionary textbfInsertion textbfPrompting (textbfDIP) When providing a non-English prompt, DIP looks up a word dictionary and inserts words' English counterparts into the prompt for LLMs. It then enables better translation into English and better English model thinking steps which leads to obviously better results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T05:10:50Z)
• Generating bilingual example sentences with large language models as lexicography assistants [2.6550899846546527]
  We present a study of LLMs' performance in generating and rating example sentences for bilingual dictionaries across languages with varying resource levels. We evaluate the quality of LLM-generated examples against the GDEX (Good Dictionary EXample) criteria: typicality, informativeness, and intelligibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T06:45:48Z)
• Crosslingual Capabilities and Knowledge Barriers in Multilingual Large Language Models [62.91524967852552]
  Large language models (LLMs) are typically multilingual due to pretraining on diverse multilingual corpora.<n>But can these models relate corresponding concepts across languages, i.e., be crosslingual?<n>This study evaluates state-of-the-art LLMs on inherently crosslingual tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T15:15:17Z)
• Zero-shot Sentiment Analysis in Low-Resource Languages Using a Multilingual Sentiment Lexicon [78.12363425794214]
  We focus on zero-shot sentiment analysis tasks across 34 languages, including 6 high/medium-resource languages, 25 low-resource languages, and 3 code-switching datasets. We demonstrate that pretraining using multilingual lexicons, without using any sentence-level sentiment data, achieves superior zero-shot performance compared to models fine-tuned on English sentiment datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T10:41:05Z)
• Democratizing LLMs for Low-Resource Languages by Leveraging their English Dominant Abilities with Linguistically-Diverse Prompts [75.33019401706188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known to effectively perform tasks by simply observing few exemplars. We propose to assemble synthetic exemplars from a diverse set of high-resource languages to prompt the LLMs to translate from any language into English. Our unsupervised prompting method performs on par with supervised few-shot learning in LLMs of different sizes for translations between English and 13 Indic and 21 African low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T08:27:47Z)
• CLSE: Corpus of Linguistically Significant Entities [58.29901964387952]
  We release a Corpus of Linguistically Significant Entities (CLSE) annotated by experts. CLSE covers 74 different semantic types to support various applications from airline ticketing to video games. We create a linguistically representative NLG evaluation benchmark in three languages: French, Marathi, and Russian.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-04T12:56:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.