Local Covariate Selection for Average Causal Effect Estimation without Pretreatment and Causal Sufficiency Assumptions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21548v1
• Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 11:08:09 GMT
• Title: Local Covariate Selection for Average Causal Effect Estimation without Pretreatment and Causal Sufficiency Assumptions
• Abstract summary: Existing approaches typically rely on global causal structure learning over all variables, or on strong assumptions such as causal sufficiency.<n>We propose a novel local learning method for covariate selection in nonparametric causal effect estimation that avoids both the pretreatment and causal sufficiency assumptions.<n> Experiments on multiple synthetic datasets and two real-world datasets show that our approach achieves accurate causal effect estimation while substantially improving computational efficiency.
• Score: 18.19166664646723
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We study the problem of selecting covariates for unbiased estimation of the total causal effect.Existing approaches typically rely on global causal structure learning over all variables, or on strong assumptions such as causal sufficiency - where observed variables share no latent confounders - or the pretreatment assumption, which limits covariates to those unaffected by the treatment or outcome. These requirements are often unrealistic in practice, and global learning becomes computationally prohibitive in high-dimensional settings.To address these challenges, we propose a novel local learning method for covariate selection in nonparametric causal effect estimation that avoids both the pretreatment and causal sufficiency assumptions. We first characterize a local boundary that contains at least one valid adjustment set whenever one exists for identifying the causal effect, and then develop local identification procedures to efficiently search within this boundary.We prove that the proposed method is sound and complete. Experiments on multiple synthetic datasets and two real-world datasets show that our approach achieves accurate causal effect estimation while substantially improving computational efficiency.

Related papers

• Learning heterogeneous treatment effects under principal stratification [4.965155763091777]
  We study the identification and estimation of the conditional principal causal effects under principal ignorability.<n>We propose a novel doubly cross-fit doubly robust machine that resolves the nested nuisance structure inherent to principal stratification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-27T20:27:17Z)
• Proximal Mediation Analysis with Hidden Recanting Witnesses [6.9475003037956435]
  Many practical settings rely on the assumption that recanting witnesses, defined as treatment-induced mediator-outcome confounders, are either absent or fully known a priori.<n>We develop three novel identification strategies to address the challenge of identifying path-specific effects in the presence of unknown recanting witnesses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T07:07:06Z)
• Disentangled Double Machine Learning for Accurate Causal Effect Estimation [80.07136847623498]
  Confounding bias is a key challenge in causal effect estimation from observational data.<n>Double Machine Learning (DML) addresses this issue by estimating treatment and outcome nuisance functions.<n>DML often produces biased and unstable estimates in highdimensional or finite-sample scenarios.<n>We propose Disentangled Double Machine Learning (DDML), a novel algorithm that integrates two key strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-24T01:40:43Z)
• Data Fusion for Partial Identification of Causal Effects [62.56890808004615]
  We propose a novel partial identification framework that enables researchers to answer key questions.<n>Is the causal effect positive or negative? and How severe must assumption violations be to overturn this conclusion?<n>We apply our framework to the Project STAR study, which investigates the effect of classroom size on students' third-grade standardized test performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T07:13:01Z)
• Local Learning for Covariate Selection in Nonparametric Causal Effect Estimation with Latent Variables [17.154150811381907]
  Estimating causal effects from nonexperimental data is a fundamental problem in many fields of science.<n>We propose a novel local learning approach for covariate selection in nonparametric causal effect estimation.<n>We validate our algorithm through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T12:08:54Z)
• Benchmarking Bayesian Causal Discovery Methods for Downstream Treatment Effect Estimation [137.3520153445413]
  A notable gap exists in the evaluation of causal discovery methods, where insufficient emphasis is placed on downstream inference. We evaluate seven established baseline causal discovery methods including a newly proposed method based on GFlowNets. The results of our study demonstrate that some of the algorithms studied are able to effectively capture a wide range of useful and diverse ATE modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T02:58:10Z)
• B-Learner: Quasi-Oracle Bounds on Heterogeneous Causal Effects Under Hidden Confounding [51.74479522965712]
  We propose a meta-learner called the B-Learner, which can efficiently learn sharp bounds on the CATE function under limits on hidden confounding. We prove its estimates are valid, sharp, efficient, and have a quasi-oracle property with respect to the constituent estimators under more general conditions than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T18:07:19Z)
• Partial Identification with Noisy Covariates: A Robust Optimization Approach [94.10051154390237]
  Causal inference from observational datasets often relies on measuring and adjusting for covariates. We show that this robust optimization approach can extend a wide range of causal adjustment methods to perform partial identification. Across synthetic and real datasets, we find that this approach provides ATE bounds with a higher coverage probability than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-22T04:24:26Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• Towards unique and unbiased causal effect estimation from data with hidden variables [0.0]
  Causal effect estimation from observational data is a crucial but challenging task. We propose an approach to achieving unique and unbiased estimation of causal effects from data with hidden variables. Based on the theorems, two algorithms are proposed for finding the proper adjustment sets from data with hidden variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-24T06:42:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.