Towards unique and unbiased causal effect estimation from data with hidden variables

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.10091v2
• Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 23:28:15 GMT
• Title: Towards unique and unbiased causal effect estimation from data with hidden variables
• Authors: Debo Cheng (1), Jiuyong Li (1), Lin Liu (1), Kui Yu (2), Thuc Duy Lee (1), Jixue Liu (1) ((1) School of Information Technology and Mathematical Sciences, University of South Australia (2) School of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Hefei University of Technology)
• Abstract summary: Causal effect estimation from observational data is a crucial but challenging task. We propose an approach to achieving unique and unbiased estimation of causal effects from data with hidden variables. Based on the theorems, two algorithms are proposed for finding the proper adjustment sets from data with hidden variables.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Causal effect estimation from observational data is a crucial but challenging task. Currently, only a limited number of data-driven causal effect estimation methods are available. These methods either provide only a bound estimation of the causal effect of a treatment on the outcome, or generate a unique estimation of the causal effect, but making strong assumptions on data and having low efficiency. In this paper, we identify a practical problem setting and propose an approach to achieving unique and unbiased estimation of causal effects from data with hidden variables. For the approach, we have developed the theorems to support the discovery of the proper covariate sets for confounding adjustment (adjustment sets). Based on the theorems, two algorithms are proposed for finding the proper adjustment sets from data with hidden variables to obtain unbiased and unique causal effect estimation. Experiments with synthetic datasets generated using five benchmark Bayesian networks and four real-world datasets have demonstrated the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed algorithms, indicating the practicability of the identified problem setting and the potential of the proposed approach in real-world applications.

Related papers

• Assumption-Lean Post-Integrated Inference with Negative Control Outcomes [0.0]
  We introduce a robust post-integrated inference (PII) method that adjusts for latent heterogeneity using negative control outcomes. Our method extends to projected direct effect estimands, accounting for hidden mediators, confounders, and moderators. The proposed doubly robust estimators are consistent and efficient under minimal assumptions and potential misspecification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T12:52:38Z)
• Efficient adjustment for complex covariates: Gaining efficiency with DOPE [56.537164957672715]
  We propose a framework that accommodates adjustment for any subset of information expressed by the covariates. Based on our theoretical results, we propose the Debiased Outcome-adapted Propensity Estorimator (DOPE) for efficient estimation of the average treatment effect (ATE) Our results show that the DOPE provides an efficient and robust methodology for ATE estimation in various observational settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T13:02:51Z)
• Integrating Active Learning in Causal Inference with Interference: A Novel Approach in Online Experiments [5.488412825534217]
  We introduce an active learning approach: Active Learning in Causal Inference with Interference (ACI) ACI uses Gaussian process to flexibly model the direct and spillover treatment effects as a function of a continuous measure of neighbors' treatment assignment. We demonstrate its feasibility in achieving accurate effects estimations with reduced data requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T04:13:59Z)
• Benchmarking Bayesian Causal Discovery Methods for Downstream Treatment Effect Estimation [137.3520153445413]
  A notable gap exists in the evaluation of causal discovery methods, where insufficient emphasis is placed on downstream inference. We evaluate seven established baseline causal discovery methods including a newly proposed method based on GFlowNets. The results of our study demonstrate that some of the algorithms studied are able to effectively capture a wide range of useful and diverse ATE modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T02:58:10Z)
• Systematic Evaluation of Predictive Fairness [60.0947291284978]
  Mitigating bias in training on biased datasets is an important open problem. We examine the performance of various debiasing methods across multiple tasks. We find that data conditions have a strong influence on relative model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-17T05:40:13Z)
• Valid Inference After Causal Discovery [73.87055989355737]
  We develop tools for valid post-causal-discovery inference. We show that a naive combination of causal discovery and subsequent inference algorithms leads to highly inflated miscoverage rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T17:40:45Z)
• Doing Great at Estimating CATE? On the Neglected Assumptions in Benchmark Comparisons of Treatment Effect Estimators [91.3755431537592]
  We show that even in arguably the simplest setting, estimation under ignorability assumptions can be misleading. We consider two popular machine learning benchmark datasets for evaluation of heterogeneous treatment effect estimators. We highlight that the inherent characteristics of the benchmark datasets favor some algorithms over others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T13:21:27Z)
• Confounding Feature Acquisition for Causal Effect Estimation [6.174721516017138]
  We frame this challenge as a problem of feature acquisition of confounding features for causal inference. Our goal is to prioritize acquiring values for a fixed and known subset of missing confounders in samples that lead to efficient average treatment effect estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-17T16:28:43Z)
• Learning Joint Nonlinear Effects from Single-variable Interventions in the Presence of Hidden Confounders [9.196779204457059]
  We propose an approach to estimate the effect of multiple simultaneous interventions in the presence of hidden confounders. We prove identifiability under the assumption that the data is generated from a nonlinear continuous structural causal model. We also conduct comprehensive experiments to verify the identifiability result as well as to compare the performance of our approach against a baseline on both synthetic and real-world data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-23T12:52:09Z)
• Decomposed Adversarial Learned Inference [118.27187231452852]
  We propose a novel approach, Decomposed Adversarial Learned Inference (DALI) DALI explicitly matches prior and conditional distributions in both data and code spaces. We validate the effectiveness of DALI on the MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CelebA datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T20:00:35Z)
• Causal query in observational data with hidden variables [0.0]
  We develop a theorem for using local search to find a superset of the adjustment variables for causal effect estimation from observational data. Based on the developed theorem, we propose a data-driven algorithm for causal query. Experiments show that the proposed algorithm is faster and produces better causal effect estimation than an existing data-driven causal effect estimation method with hidden variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-28T11:23:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.