Evaluating the Relevance of Uncertainty Estimators for LLM Hallucination

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27016v1
• Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 13:34:54 GMT
• Title: Evaluating the Relevance of Uncertainty Estimators for LLM Hallucination
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are prone to hallucinations, i.e., statements unsupported by the input or training data.<n>We present a systematic empirical study of the association between uncertainty estimators and hallucinations in LLMs.
• Score: 17.688677912242593
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are prone to hallucinations, i.e., statements unsupported by the input or training data, hindering reliable deployment. In parallel, numerous uncertainty estimation (UE) methods have been proposed to quantify model confidence and are often implicitly treated as proxies for model failure. However, the relationship between uncertainty and hallucinations remains insufficiently characterized. We present a systematic empirical study of the association between uncertainty estimators and hallucinations in LLMs. Rather than assuming this association, we evaluate directly when and to what extent it holds. We consider a diverse set of uncertainty estimators, including information-theoretic, sampling-based, and reflexive estimators, and examine their behavior across hallucination settings. Our experiments cover both intrinsic hallucinations (violations of input faithfulness) and extrinsic hallucinations (unsupported claims relative to training data), using four complementary benchmarks, including RAGTruth and HalluLens. We find that the association is highly variable and often weak, depending on the hallucination type and the LLM under evaluation. These results challenge the use of uncertainty as a direct signal of hallucination and clarify when it provides actionable information.

Related papers

• When Bias Pretends to Be Truth: How Spurious Correlations Undermine Hallucination Detection in LLMs [15.622799135126455]
  We show that large language models (LLMs) continue to exhibit hallucinations, generating plausible yet incorrect responses.<n>We highlight a critical yet previously underexplored class of hallucinations driven by spurious correlations.<n>Existing hallucination detection methods, such as confidence-based filtering and inner-state probing, fundamentally fail in the presence of spurious correlations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T17:19:27Z)
• HACK: Hallucinations Along Certainty and Knowledge Axes [66.66625343090743]
  We propose a framework for categorizing hallucinations along two axes: knowledge and certainty.<n>We identify a particularly concerning subset of hallucinations where models hallucinate with certainty despite having the correct knowledge internally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T09:34:31Z)
• SHALE: A Scalable Benchmark for Fine-grained Hallucination Evaluation in LVLMs [52.03164192840023]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) still suffer from hallucinations, i.e., generating content inconsistent with input or established world knowledge.<n>We propose an automated data construction pipeline that produces scalable, controllable, and diverse evaluation data.<n>We construct SHALE, a benchmark designed to assess both faithfulness and factuality hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T07:58:01Z)
• Counterfactual Probing for Hallucination Detection and Mitigation in Large Language Models [0.0]
  We propose Counterfactual Probing, a novel approach for detecting and mitigating hallucinations in large language models.<n>Our method dynamically generates counterfactual statements that appear plausible but contain subtle factual errors, then evaluates the model's sensitivity to these perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T17:29:48Z)
• Theoretical Foundations and Mitigation of Hallucination in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Hallucination in Large Language Models (LLMs) refers to the generation of content that is not faithful to the input or the real-world facts.<n>This paper provides a rigorous treatment of hallucination in LLMs, including formal definitions and theoretical analyses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-20T15:22:34Z)
• RePPL: Recalibrating Perplexity by Uncertainty in Semantic Propagation and Language Generation for Explainable QA Hallucination Detection [26.186204911845866]
  hallucinations remain a vital obstacle to large language models' trustworthy use.<n>We propose RePPL to recalibrate uncertainty measurement by these two aspects.<n>Our method achieves the best comprehensive detection performance across various QA datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T11:23:05Z)
• HalluLens: LLM Hallucination Benchmark [49.170128733508335]
  Large language models (LLMs) often generate responses that deviate from user input or training data, a phenomenon known as "hallucination"<n>This paper introduces a comprehensive hallucination benchmark, incorporating both new extrinsic and existing intrinsic evaluation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T13:40:27Z)
• Calibrating Verbal Uncertainty as a Linear Feature to Reduce Hallucinations [51.92795774118647]
  We find that verbal uncertainty'' is governed by a single linear feature in the representation space of LLMs.<n>We show that this has only moderate correlation with the actual semantic uncertainty'' of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T17:51:04Z)
• HalluEntity: Benchmarking and Understanding Entity-Level Hallucination Detection [16.27352940098609]
  We propose a new data set, HalluEntity, which annotates hallucination at the entity level.<n>Based on the dataset, we evaluate uncertainty-based hallucination detection approaches across 17 modern LLMs.<n>Our experimental results show that uncertainty estimation approaches focusing on individual token probabilities tend to over-predict hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T16:01:41Z)
• Rowen: Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Hallucination Mitigation in LLMs [88.75700174889538]
  Hallucinations present a significant challenge for large language models (LLMs)<n>The utilization of parametric knowledge in generating factual content is constrained by the limited knowledge of LLMs.<n>We present Rowen, a novel framework that enhances LLMs with an adaptive retrieval augmentation process tailored to address hallucinated outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T11:55:40Z)
• On Hallucination and Predictive Uncertainty in Conditional Language Generation [76.18783678114325]
  Higher predictive uncertainty corresponds to a higher chance of hallucination. Epistemic uncertainty is more indicative of hallucination than aleatoric or total uncertainties. It helps to achieve better results of trading performance in standard metric for less hallucination with the proposed beam search variant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-28T00:32:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.