AMNESIA: A Large Scale Medical Unlearning Benchmark Suite with Disease-Informed Analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30599v1
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 21:46:46 GMT
- Title: AMNESIA: A Large Scale Medical Unlearning Benchmark Suite with Disease-Informed Analysis
- Abstract summary: We introduce AMNESIA, the first large-scale, open source benchmark for medical unlearning.<n>We use it to evaluate four widely used unlearning methods at both random patient and disease-level.<n>We show that unlearning individual patients erodes knowledge of others with the same condition, calling for methods that can better separate patients from shared clinical knowledge.
- Score: 10.933595109116768
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Medical knowledge is continuously evolving. This creates a need to update or selectively forget information encoded in already-trained medical LLMs. Machine unlearning aims to remove the influence of specific training data from a model without full retraining. Yet, existing unlearning benchmarks rely on synthetic or small-scale general data, leaving clinical unlearning understudied. We introduce AMNESIA, the first large-scale, open source benchmark for medical unlearning, with 70,560 question-answer pairs from 8,820 patient notes across 11 disease categories. AMNESIA includes both factual questions testing direct recall and reasoning questions testing clinical inference. We use it to evaluate four widely used unlearning methods at both random patient and disease-level, and introduce a new metric for detecting leakage of medical terminology. We show that unlearning individual patients erodes knowledge of others with the same condition, calling for methods that can better separate patients from shared clinical knowledge.
Related papers
- REMEDI: A Benchmark for Retention and Unlearning Evaluation in Multi-label Clinical Disease Inference [15.89997509050996]
We introduce REMEDI, an extensive benchmark for machine unlearning tailored to multi-label and multiclass clinical disease inference.<n> REMEDI considers: (1) a relevant application domain (medical), (2) comprehensive unlearning setups involving diverse sets of forget instances, (3) challenging unlearning scenarios including multi-label and multi-class classification tasks, and (4) evaluation metrics involving performance both in terms of utility and extent of unlearning achieved.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-05T10:51:20Z) - Simulating Viva Voce Examinations to Evaluate Clinical Reasoning in Large Language Models [51.91760712805404]
We introduce VivaBench, a benchmark for evaluating sequential clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our dataset consists of 1762 physician-curated clinical vignettes structured as interactive scenarios that simulate a (oral) examination in medical training.<n>Our analysis identified several failure modes that mirror common cognitive errors in clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-11T16:24:35Z) - Facts Fade Fast: Evaluating Memorization of Outdated Medical Knowledge in Large Language Models [23.266037521209796]
Large Language Models show potential to enhance healthcare by assisting medical researchers and physicians.<n>Their reliance on static training data is a major risk when medical recommendations evolve with new research and developments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-04T15:17:50Z) - Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions.<n>We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning.<n>Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z) - Fact or Guesswork? Evaluating Large Language Models' Medical Knowledge with Structured One-Hop Judgments [108.55277188617035]
Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in various downstream task domains, but their abilities to directly recall and apply factual medical knowledge remains under-explored.<n>We introduce the Medical Knowledge Judgment dataset (MKJ), a dataset derived from the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), a comprehensive repository of standardized vocabularies and knowledge graphs.<n>Through a binary classification framework, MKJ evaluates LLMs' grasp of fundamental medical facts by having them assess the validity of concise, one-hop statements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T05:27:51Z) - Handling missing values in clinical machine learning: Insights from an expert study [10.637366819633302]
Inherently interpretable machine learning (IML) models offer valuable support for clinical decision-making.<n>Traditional approaches, such as imputation or discarding incomplete records, are often impractical in scenarios where data is missing at test time.<n>We surveyed 55 clinicians from 29 French trauma centers to study their interaction with three IML models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-14T17:02:41Z) - FEDMEKI: A Benchmark for Scaling Medical Foundation Models via Federated Knowledge Injection [83.54960238236548]
FEDMEKI not only preserves data privacy but also enhances the capability of medical foundation models.
FEDMEKI allows medical foundation models to learn from a broader spectrum of medical knowledge without direct data exposure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-17T15:18:56Z) - README: Bridging Medical Jargon and Lay Understanding for Patient Education through Data-Centric NLP [9.432205523734707]
We introduce a new task of automatically generating lay definitions, aiming to simplify medical terms into patient-friendly lay language.
We first created the dataset, an extensive collection of over 50,000 unique (medical term, lay definition) pairs and 300,000 mentions.
We have also engineered a data-centric Human-AI pipeline that synergizes data filtering, augmentation, and selection to improve data quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-24T23:01:00Z) - Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledge [21.630872464930587]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language understanding and generation.
We propose a framework for human evaluation of model answers along multiple axes including factuality, precision, possible harm, and bias.
We show that comprehension, recall of knowledge, and medical reasoning improve with model scale and instruction prompt tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-26T14:28:24Z) - Detecting Shortcut Learning for Fair Medical AI using Shortcut Testing [62.9062883851246]
Machine learning holds great promise for improving healthcare, but it is critical to ensure that its use will not propagate or amplify health disparities.
One potential driver of algorithmic unfairness, shortcut learning, arises when ML models base predictions on improper correlations in the training data.
Using multi-task learning, we propose the first method to assess and mitigate shortcut learning as a part of the fairness assessment of clinical ML systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-21T09:35:38Z) - Multi-confound regression adversarial network for deep learning-based
diagnosis on highly heterogenous clinical data [1.2891210250935143]
We developed a novel deep learning architecture, MUCRAN, to train a deep learning model on highly heterogeneous clinical data.
We trained MUCRAN using 16,821 clinical T1 Axial brain MRIs collected from Massachusetts General Hospital before 2019.
The model showed a robust performance of over 90% accuracy on newly collected data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-05T18:39:09Z) - Select-ProtoNet: Learning to Select for Few-Shot Disease Subtype
Prediction [55.94378672172967]
We focus on few-shot disease subtype prediction problem, identifying subgroups of similar patients.
We introduce meta learning techniques to develop a new model, which can extract the common experience or knowledge from interrelated clinical tasks.
Our new model is built upon a carefully designed meta-learner, called Prototypical Network, that is a simple yet effective meta learning machine for few-shot image classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-02T02:50:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.