Transferring Information Across Interventions in Causal Bayesian Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01457v1
• Date: Sun, 31 May 2026 21:32:45 GMT
• Title: Transferring Information Across Interventions in Causal Bayesian Optimization
• Abstract summary: We propose graph-coupled causal Bayesian optimization.<n>We show that this kernel has low rank, bounded by the number of shared parameters.<n>We also describe nonlinear and adaptive extensions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Bayesian optimization is a popular way to optimize expensive systems, where every experiment, simulation, or intervention costs time or money. In its standard form, it treats the variables we control as plain inputs to a black box and cannot tell apart mere correlation from a real cause and effect. Causal Bayesian optimization closes part of this gap by using a known causal graph together with observational data to decide which variables are worth intervening on. Existing methods, however, learn the effect of each possible intervention almost in isolation, even though in a causal system these effects usually share the same underlying mechanisms. We propose graph-coupled causal Bayesian optimization, which ties the different intervention effects together through the uncertainty we have about a small set of shared causal parameters. The result is a causal kernel that lets evidence collected from one intervention improve our estimate of related interventions. For identifiable linear Gaussian causal models, we show that this kernel has low rank, bounded by the number of shared parameters rather than by the size of the intervention menu. This in turn yields an information-gain bound that grows only logarithmically in the optimization horizon, and a regret bound that cleanly separates three sources of error: optimization, causal estimation, and the choice of which intervention sets to consider. We also describe nonlinear and adaptive extensions. Across theory-aligned Gaussian systems, shared-mechanism stress tests, and standard causal optimization benchmarks, the method keeps the benefits of causal Bayesian optimization while transferring information across related interventions, with the clearest gains when direct interventions on the target's parents are unavailable and sparse interventional data must be reused across a large family of candidate interventions.

Related papers

• Causal Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Graphs [17.871251114630827]
  Causal Bayesian Optimization (CBO) is a methodology designed to optimize an outcome variable by leveraging known causal relationships through targeted interventions.<n>Traditional CBO methods require a fully and accurately specified causal graph, which is a limitation in many real-world scenarios where such graphs are unknown.<n>We propose a new method for the CBO framework that operates without prior knowledge of the causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T11:14:37Z)
• Multi-Objective Causal Bayesian Optimization [2.5311562666866494]
  We propose Multi-Objective Causal Bayesian Optimization (MO-CBO) to identify optimal interventions within a known multi-target causal graph.<n>We show that MO-CBO can be decomposed into several traditional multi-objective optimization tasks.<n>The proposed method will be validated on both synthetic and real-world causal graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T17:26:16Z)
• Optimal Kernel Choice for Score Function-based Causal Discovery [92.65034439889872]
  We propose a kernel selection method within the generalized score function that automatically selects the optimal kernel that best fits the data. We conduct experiments on both synthetic data and real-world benchmarks, and the results demonstrate that our proposed method outperforms kernel selection methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T09:32:20Z)
• Efficient Transfer Learning via Causal Bounds [8.981637739384674]
  We analyze how causal side-information accelerates online learning, and experiments on data reduction.<n>Our analysis precisely characterizes when how causal side-information accelerates online learning, and experiments on data reduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T13:24:50Z)
• Model-based Causal Bayesian Optimization [78.120734120667]
  We propose model-based causal Bayesian optimization (MCBO) MCBO learns a full system model instead of only modeling intervention-reward pairs. Unlike in standard Bayesian optimization, our acquisition function cannot be evaluated in closed form.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T14:28:21Z)
• Active Learning for Optimal Intervention Design in Causal Models [11.294389953686945]
  We develop a causal active learning strategy to identify interventions that are optimal, as measured by the discrepancy between the post-interventional mean of the distribution and a desired target mean. We apply our approach to both synthetic data and single-cell transcriptomic data from Perturb-CITE-seq experiments to identify optimal perturbations that induce a specific cell state transition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-10T20:40:30Z)
• Data-Driven Influence Functions for Optimization-Based Causal Inference [105.5385525290466]
  We study a constructive algorithm that approximates Gateaux derivatives for statistical functionals by finite differencing. We study the case where probability distributions are not known a priori but need to be estimated from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-29T16:16:22Z)
• Active Bayesian Causal Inference [72.70593653185078]
  We propose Active Bayesian Causal Inference (ABCI), a fully-Bayesian active learning framework for integrated causal discovery and reasoning. ABCI jointly infers a posterior over causal models and queries of interest. We show that our approach is more data-efficient than several baselines that only focus on learning the full causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T22:38:57Z)
• Partial Identification with Noisy Covariates: A Robust Optimization Approach [94.10051154390237]
  Causal inference from observational datasets often relies on measuring and adjusting for covariates. We show that this robust optimization approach can extend a wide range of causal adjustment methods to perform partial identification. Across synthetic and real datasets, we find that this approach provides ATE bounds with a higher coverage probability than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-22T04:24:26Z)
• BayesIMP: Uncertainty Quantification for Causal Data Fusion [52.184885680729224]
  We study the causal data fusion problem, where datasets pertaining to multiple causal graphs are combined to estimate the average treatment effect of a target variable. We introduce a framework which combines ideas from probabilistic integration and kernel mean embeddings to represent interventional distributions in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T10:14:18Z)
• Causal Bayesian Optimization [8.958125394444679]
  We study the problem of globally optimizing a variable of interest that is part of a causal model in which a sequence of interventions can be performed. Our approach combines ideas from causal inference, uncertainty quantification and sequential decision making. We show how knowing the causal graph significantly improves the ability to reason about optimal decision making strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-24T13:20:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.