Recovering Direct Price Effects of Environmental Amenities in Housing Markets: Regression and Causal Machine Learning Model Assessment with Empirical Monte Carlo Simulation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02795v1
• Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2026 18:59:44 GMT
• Title: Recovering Direct Price Effects of Environmental Amenities in Housing Markets: Regression and Causal Machine Learning Model Assessment with Empirical Monte Carlo Simulation
• Abstract summary: Hedonic price models are widely used to assess how environmental amenities affect property values.<n>We conduct an empirical Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate the performance of traditional and causal machine learning approaches.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Hedonic price models are widely used to assess how environmental amenities affect property values, yet methodological guidance for estimating direct price effects remains sparse. We conduct an empirical Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate the performance of traditional and causal machine learning approaches for estimating the direct unmediated price effect of spatially delineated amenities on treated properties (DUET), a conservative lower-bound approximation for welfare changes with direct applications to benefit-cost analysis. Where previous simulations rely on parametric assumptions, we retain the actual data-generating process underlying over 1 million property transactions from upstate New York (1990--2024). By randomly assigning "treatment locations" across iterations we establish a "ground truth" that allows us to precisely measure estimation error. Our results demonstrate that generalized difference-in-differences (DID) regression consistently outperforms baseline DID and two-way fixed effects models across all scenarios. Causal Machine Learning (CML) methods, particularly causal forest DID, achieve comparable performance to generalized DID in most scenarios. In larger samples (above 3,000 treated) increasingly common in contemporary hedonic studies, CML approaches offer substantial advantages when properly specified. Based on empirical simulation results, we provide a set of method-specific best practice recommendations for both traditional regression and causal machine learning approaches.

Related papers

• Joint Model and Data Sparsification via the Marginal Likelihood [53.29070892356214]
  We propose jointly learning individual feature and sample relevancies, enabling simultaneous model and data sparsification.<n>This symmetric pruning of model and data offers a natural extension that preserves conjugacy.<n> Empirical results across diverse regression tasks affirm that a joint ARD approach consistently yields both sparse and robust prediction models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T13:26:53Z)
• On Predicting the Post-training Potential of Pre-trained LLMs [60.07459271263409]
  We introduce a new task of predicting post-training potential - forecasting a base model's performance before post-training.<n>We propose RuDE, a unified framework that bypasses the generation gap of base models by leveraging response discrimination.<n>Experiments demonstrate a correlation greater than 90% with post-training performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T11:33:49Z)
• Betting for Sim-to-Real Performance Evaluation [5.669264620577287]
  We develop theoretical conditions under which a betting mechanism can yield accurate and efficient estimates.<n>We provide concrete decision rules that diagnose when these approximate betting strategies are working as intended.<n>We also showcase an illustrative case in which a group of synthetic distributions are used to infer the real-world pick-and-place accuracy of a robotic manipulator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T03:58:50Z)
• Towards Real-world Human Behavior Simulation: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Long-horizon, Cross-scenario, Heterogeneous Behavior Traces [81.41397370235102]
  We introduce OmniBehavior, the first user simulation benchmark constructed entirely from real-world data.<n>We show that current models struggle to accurately simulate complex behaviors, with performance plateauing even as context windows expand.<n>This results in the loss of individual differences and long-tail behaviors, highlighting critical directions for future high-fidelity simulation research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T15:26:21Z)
• Quantile Regression with Large Language Models for Price Prediction [15.277244542405345]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in structured prediction tasks, including regression.<n>We propose a novel quantile regression approach that enables LLMs to produce full predictive distributions.<n>A Mistral-7B model fine-tuned with quantile heads significantly outperforms traditional approaches for both point and distributional estimations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-07T04:19:28Z)
• Model-free Methods for Event History Analysis and Efficient Adjustment (PhD Thesis) [55.2480439325792]
  This thesis is a series of independent contributions to statistics unified by a model-free perspective.<n>The first chapter elaborates on how a model-free perspective can be used to formulate flexible methods that leverage prediction techniques from machine learning.<n>The second chapter studies the concept of local independence, which describes whether the evolution of one process is directly influenced by another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T19:24:09Z)
• Prediction-Powered Causal Inferences [59.98498488132307]
  We focus on Prediction-Powered Causal Inferences (PPCI)<n>We first show that conditional calibration guarantees valid PPCI at population level.<n>We then introduce a sufficient representation constraint transferring validity across experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T10:52:17Z)
• Predictions as Surrogates: Revisiting Surrogate Outcomes in the Age of AI [12.569286058146343]
  We establish a formal connection between the decades-old surrogate outcome model in biostatistics and the emerging field of prediction-powered inference (PPI)<n>We develop recalibrated prediction-powered inference, a more efficient approach to statistical inference than existing PPI proposals.<n>We demonstrate significant gains in effective sample size over existing PPI proposals via three applications leveraging state-of-the-art machine learning/AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T18:30:33Z)
• Testing Generalizability in Causal Inference [3.547529079746247]
  No formal procedure exists for statistically evaluating generalizability in machine learning algorithms.<n>We propose a systematic framework for statistically evaluating the generalizability of high-dimensional causal inference models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T11:44:00Z)
• On conditional diffusion models for PDE simulations [53.01911265639582]
  We study score-based diffusion models for forecasting and assimilation of sparse observations. We propose an autoregressive sampling approach that significantly improves performance in forecasting. We also propose a new training strategy for conditional score-based models that achieves stable performance over a range of history lengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T18:31:04Z)
• A Gradient Analysis Framework for Rewarding Good and Penalizing Bad Examples in Language Models [63.949883238901414]
  We present a unique angle of gradient analysis of loss functions that simultaneously reward good examples and penalize bad ones in LMs. We find that ExMATE serves as a superior surrogate for MLE, and that combining DPO with ExMATE instead of MLE further enhances both the statistical (5-7%) and generative (+18% win rate) performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T17:46:18Z)
• Estimating Causal Effects with Double Machine Learning -- A Method Evaluation [5.904095466127043]
  We review one of the most prominent methods - "double/debiased machine learning" (DML) Our findings indicate that the application of a suitably flexible machine learning algorithm within DML improves the adjustment for various nonlinear confounding relationships. When estimating the effects of air pollution on housing prices, we find that DML estimates are consistently larger than estimates of less flexible methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T13:21:33Z)
• Fast, Scale-Adaptive, and Uncertainty-Aware Downscaling of Earth System Model Fields with Generative Machine Learning [0.0]
  High-resolution Earth system model (ESM) simulations are essential to assess the ecological and socio-economic impacts of anthropogenic climate change.<n>Recent machine learning approaches have shown promising results in downscaling ESM simulations, outperforming state-of-the-art statistical approaches.<n>We address these shortcomings by learning a consistency model (CM) that efficiently and accurately downscales arbitrary ESM simulations without retraining in a zero-shot manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T08:41:41Z)
• Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via Conjunct Effect Modeling [30.835774920236872]
  We study off-policy evaluation of contextual bandit policies for large discrete action spaces. We propose a new estimator, called OffCEM, that is based on the conjunct effect model (CEM), a novel decomposition of the causal effect into a cluster effect and a residual effect. Experiments demonstrate that OffCEM provides substantial improvements in OPE especially in the presence of many actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-14T04:16:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.