Does Artificial Intelligence Advance Science?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05118v1
• Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 17:23:58 GMT
• Title: Does Artificial Intelligence Advance Science?
• Abstract summary: We analyze over one million publications from OpenAlex to investigate the relationship between AI adoption and scientific creativity.<n>We find that AI publications are significantly more likely to achieve top-decile creativity relative to non-AI publications.
• Score: 0.9176056742068813
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper examines whether and how artificial intelligence (AI) advances scientific creativity. Drawing on scientific publications, the primary output of researchers, we analyze over one million publications from OpenAlex to investigate the relationship between AI adoption and multiple dimensions of scientific creativity, including novelty (recombinant novelty and object novelty) and impact (3-year short-run citation impact and 10-year long-run citation impact). We find that AI publications are significantly more likely to achieve top-decile creativity relative to non-AI publications, with 5.5 to 10.2 percentage point higher likelihood to rank in the top creativity decile. Critically, we uncover substantial heterogeneity across AI research modes. Tool-oriented AI research, which applies existing AI models to domain tasks, is associated with the largest gains in recombinant-based creativity, while Adaptation-oriented AI research, modifying AI models for domain-specific problems, is associated with relatively higher object-based creativity. These findings reveal that AI does not advance science through a single mechanism but through structurally distinct creative pathways that depend on how AI is incorporated into the research process. Our results contribute to ongoing debates about AI's role in science and carry direct implications for research evaluation and science policy, highlighting the need for assessment frameworks that can distinguish between recombinant and conceptual forms of creativity and that recognize how different modes of AI adoption produce fundamentally different types of scientific contribution.

Related papers

• AI Research Agents Narrow Scientific Exploration [12.949322198287417]
  We generate 37,802 scientific ideas from shared seed literature across citation-defined research areas in AI and machine learning.<n>We compare the resulting AI ideas against human-authored papers from the same research areas, follow-on human research emerging from the same seed literature, and the seed literature itself.<n>Overall, current AI research agents appear better suited to local elaboration than to broadening scientific exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T03:26:43Z)
• The Agentification of Scientific Research: A Physicist's Perspective [0.2538209532048867]
  The article outlines a gradual path from AI as a research tool to AI as a scientific collaborator.<n>It argues that continuous learning and diversity of ideas are essential if AI is to play a meaningful role in original scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T07:27:57Z)
• Research Paradigm of Materials Science Tetrahedra with Artificial Intelligence [7.779425241736052]
  We propose two new research paradigms to stimulate data-driven and AI-augmented research.<n>One focuses on AI for materials science by considering the Matter-Data-PotentialAgent diagram.<n>The other demonstrates AI research by discussing Data-Architecture-Inference-Inference relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-14T04:30:03Z)
• From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery [108.1082357960201]
  Agentic AI shows capabilities in hypothesis generation, experimental design, execution, analysis, and iterative refinement.<n>This survey provides a domain-oriented review of autonomous scientific discovery across life sciences, chemistry, materials science, and physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T05:25:54Z)
• AI-Driven Automation Can Become the Foundation of Next-Era Science of Science Research [58.944125758758936]
  The Science of Science (SoS) explores the mechanisms underlying scientific discovery.<n>The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) presents a transformative opportunity for the next generation of SoS.<n>We outline the advantages of AI over traditional methods, discuss potential limitations, and propose pathways to overcome them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T15:01:33Z)
• Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
  A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.<n>Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
• AI empowering research: 10 ways how science can benefit from AI [0.0]
  This article explores the transformative impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on scientific research. It highlights ten ways in which AI is revolutionizing the work of scientists, including powerful referencing tools, improved understanding of research problems, enhanced research question generation, optimized research design, stub data generation, data transformation, advanced data analysis, and AI-assisted reporting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T18:41:18Z)
• The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop Artificial Intelligence [67.70415658080121]
  Recent advances in machine learning and AI are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole. AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access. Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-09T21:16:56Z)
• Quantifying the Benefit of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research [2.4700789675440524]
  We estimate both the direct use of AI and the potential benefit of AI in scientific research. We find that the use of AI in research is widespread throughout the sciences, growing especially rapidly since 2015. Our analysis reveals considerable potential for AI to benefit numerous scientific fields, yet a notable disconnect exists between AI education and its research applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T08:08:50Z)
• Learning from learning machines: a new generation of AI technology to meet the needs of science [59.261050918992325]
  We outline emerging opportunities and challenges to enhance the utility of AI for scientific discovery. The distinct goals of AI for industry versus the goals of AI for science create tension between identifying patterns in data versus discovering patterns in the world from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-27T00:55:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.