Representation Learning Enables Scalable Multitask Deep Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05555v1
• Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 01:09:20 GMT
• Title: Representation Learning Enables Scalable Multitask Deep Reinforcement Learning
• Abstract summary: We show that combining predictive, model-based representations with high-capacity value function approximation is sufficient to achieve strong performance.<n>We evaluate a simple model-free algorithm, MR.Q, coupled with auxiliary predictive objectives into a scalable actor-critic architecture.
• Score: 32.45608314596038
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Scaling reinforcement learning (RL) to diverse multitask settings remains a central challenge. While recent advances in model-based RL achieve strong performance, they rely on planning and complex training pipelines, making it unclear which components are essential for scalability. We revisit this question and argue that the primary driver of scalable multitask RL is not model-based control, but \emph{representation learning}. In particular, we show that combining predictive, model-based representations with high-capacity value function approximation is sufficient to achieve strong performance, even without planning. We evaluate a simple model-free algorithm, MR.Q, coupled with auxiliary predictive objectives into a scalable actor-critic architecture. This approach outperforms a recent world-model-based method and a range of deep RL baselines across a diverse suite of multitask continuous control tasks, while significantly reducing computational overhead and improving wall-clock efficiency. We observe consistent improvements with increased model capacity and show through ablations that predictive representation learning is critical for performance.

Related papers

• Why Does Reinforcement Learning Generalize? A Feature-Level Mechanistic Study of Post-Training in Large Language Models [51.45122910254346]
  Reinforcement learning (RL)-based post-training often improves the reasoning performance of large language models beyond the training domain.<n>Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) frequently leads to general forgetting capabilities.<n>We present a feature-level mechanistic analysis methodology to probe RL generalization using a controlled experimental setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T21:22:34Z)
• Model Merging in the Essential Subspace [78.5390284258307]
  Model merging aims to integrate multiple task-specific fine-tuned models into a single multi-task model without additional training.<n>Despite extensive research, task interference remains a major obstacle that often undermines the performance of merged models.<n>We propose ESM (Essential Subspace Merging), a robust framework for effective model merging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T00:33:38Z)
• Beyond Accuracy: Dissecting Mathematical Reasoning for LLMs Under Reinforcement Learning [93.00629872970364]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the dominant paradigm for improving the performance of language models on complex reasoning tasks.<n>We introduce SPARKLE, a fine-grained analytic framework to dissect the effects of RL across three key dimensions.<n>We study whether difficult problems -- those yielding no RL signals and mixed-quality reasoning traces -- can still be effectively used for training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T07:53:59Z)
• Diffusion Guidance Is a Controllable Policy Improvement Operator [98.11511661904618]
  CFGRL is trained with the simplicity of supervised learning, yet can further improve on the policies in the data.<n>On offline RL tasks, we observe a reliable trend -- increased guidance weighting leads to increased performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T14:06:50Z)
• Bigger, Regularized, Categorical: High-Capacity Value Functions are Efficient Multi-Task Learners [60.75160178669076]
  We show that the use of high-capacity value models trained via cross-entropy and conditioned on learnable task embeddings addresses the problem of task interference in online reinforcement learning.<n>We test our approach on 7 multi-task benchmarks with over 280 unique tasks, spanning high degree-of-freedom humanoid control and discrete vision-based RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T06:41:45Z)
• Echo Chamber: RL Post-training Amplifies Behaviors Learned in Pretraining [74.83412846804977]
  Reinforcement learning (RL)-based fine-tuning has become a crucial step in post-training language models.<n>We present a systematic end-to-end study of RL fine-tuning for mathematical reasoning by training models entirely from scratch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T17:15:53Z)
• Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning Enables Parameter Scaling [14.492112822801113]
  Multi-task reinforcement learning aims to endow a single agent with the ability to perform well on multiple tasks.<n>Recent works have focused on developing novel sophisticated architectures to improve performance.<n>We argue that gains are mostly due to scale by demonstrating that naively scaling up a simple MTRL baseline to match parameter counts outperforms the more sophisticated architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T04:13:02Z)
• Feature Alignment-Based Knowledge Distillation for Efficient Compression of Large Language Models [4.737806982257592]
  This study proposes a knowledge distillation algorithm based on large language models and feature alignment.<n>The proposed model performs very close to the state-of-the-art GPT-4 model in terms of evaluation indicators such as perplexity, BLEU, ROUGE, and CER.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-27T04:37:06Z)
• Are Expressive Models Truly Necessary for Offline RL? [18.425797519857113]
  Sequential modeling requires capturing accurate dynamics across long horizons in trajectory data to ensure reasonable policy performance.<n>We show that lightweight models as simple as shallow 2-layers can enjoy accurate dynamics consistency and significantly reduced sequential modeling errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-15T17:33:56Z)
• Simplified Temporal Consistency Reinforcement Learning [19.814047499837084]
  We show that a simple representation learning approach relying on a latent dynamics model trained by latent temporal consistency is sufficient for high-performance RL. Our approach outperforms model-free methods by a large margin and matches model-based methods' sample efficiency while training 2.4 times faster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T19:37:43Z)
• Learning a model is paramount for sample efficiency in reinforcement learning control of PDEs [5.488334211013093]
  We show that learning an actuated model in parallel to training the RL agent significantly reduces the total amount of required data sampled from the real system. We also show that iteratively updating the model is of major importance to avoid biases in the RL training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T16:14:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.