Evaluating RAG Reliability under Clean, Misleading, and Mixed Retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07783v1
• Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 18:54:23 GMT
• Title: Evaluating RAG Reliability under Clean, Misleading, and Mixed Retrieval
• Abstract summary: In misinformation-rich environments, retrieved content may include plausible but incorrect information.<n>We propose an evaluation protocol to test how the RAG system handles conflicts between parametric knowledge and evidence retrieved from context.<n>This study aims to provide insights into the robustness of RAG systems in information disorder scenarios.
• Score: 0.12183405753834557
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is widely used to improve the factual reliability of large language models (LLMs) by grounding answers in retrieved evidence. In misinformation-rich environments, however, retrieved content may include plausible but incorrect information, raising concerns about the reliability of RAG-based information access systems. In this work, we propose an evaluation protocol to systematically test how the RAG system handles conflicts between parametric knowledge and evidence retrieved from context with varying amounts of misleading information. We target correct answers to factoid questions that the model responds to correctly, even when there is no retrieval, and use this to test the system with clean, poisoned, and mixed evidence. The proposed analytical framework combines parametric override and confidence metrics to assess when and how misleading information affects the generation process of LLMs. This study aims to provide insights into the robustness of RAG systems in information disorder scenarios.

Related papers

• Evidence-Aligned Entity Verification for Hallucination Detection in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [17.29201876137025]
  Hallucination detection is crucial for large language models (LLMs)<n>Current detection methods depend on internal signals like uncertainty and self-consistency checks.<n>Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising solution by retrieving relevant evidence at inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-08T05:22:29Z)
• MIRAGE: Defending Long-Form RAG Against Misinformation Pollution [87.40537931342082]
  We introduce MIRAGE, a training-free, model-agnostic defense for long-form RAG.<n>MIRAGE builds an NLI-based cross-document claim graph and applies a Defended-Claims Gate to either condition generation on a consistent, multi-source supported subset or to block retrieval and answer parametrically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-06T13:36:12Z)
• Bounding Hallucinations: Information-Theoretic Guarantees for RAG Systems via Merlin-Arthur Protocols [40.19713302778418]
  We introduce a training framework that treats the entire RAG pipeline as an interactive proof system.<n>We show that M/A-trained LLMs show improved groundedness, completeness, soundness, and reject behavior.<n>Our results demonstrate that autonomous interactive-proof-style supervision provides a principled and practical path toward reliable RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T14:50:38Z)
• Faithfulness-Aware Uncertainty Quantification for Fact-Checking the Output of Retrieval Augmented Generation [108.13261761812517]
  We introduce FRANQ (Faithfulness-based Retrieval Augmented UNcertainty Quantification), a novel method for hallucination detection in RAG outputs.<n>We present a new long-form Question Answering (QA) dataset annotated for both factuality and faithfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T11:56:59Z)
• Divide-Then-Align: Honest Alignment based on the Knowledge Boundary of RAG [51.120170062795566]
  We propose Divide-Then-Align (DTA) to endow RAG systems with the ability to respond with "I don't know" when the query is out of the knowledge boundary.<n>DTA balances accuracy with appropriate abstention, enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of retrieval-augmented systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T08:21:21Z)
• Resolving Conflicting Evidence in Automated Fact-Checking: A Study on Retrieval-Augmented LLMs [12.923119372847834]
  This paper presents the first systematic evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models for fact-checking.<n>Experiments reveal critical vulnerabilities in state-of-the-art RAG methods, particularly in resolving conflicts stemming from differences in media source credibility.<n>Our results show that effectively incorporating source credibility significantly enhances the ability of RAG models to resolve conflicting evidence and improve fact-checking performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T11:35:03Z)
• Worse than Zero-shot? A Fact-Checking Dataset for Evaluating the Robustness of RAG Against Misleading Retrievals [5.605770511387228]
  RAGuard is the first benchmark to evaluate the robustness of RAG systems against misleading retrievals.<n>Unlike prior benchmarks that rely on synthetic noise, our fact-checking dataset captures naturally occurring misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T05:50:15Z)
• Unanswerability Evaluation for Retrieval Augmented Generation [74.3022365715597]
  UAEval4RAG is a framework designed to evaluate whether RAG systems can handle unanswerable queries effectively.<n>We define a taxonomy with six unanswerable categories, and UAEval4RAG automatically synthesizes diverse and challenging queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T19:11:55Z)
• Semantic Tokens in Retrieval Augmented Generation [0.0]
  I propose a novel Comparative RAG system that introduces an evaluator module to bridge the gap between probabilistic RAG systems and deterministically verifiable responses.<n>This framework paves the way for more reliable and scalable question-answering applications in domains requiring high precision and verifiability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T16:52:06Z)
• Do You Know What You Are Talking About? Characterizing Query-Knowledge Relevance For Reliable Retrieval Augmented Generation [19.543102037001134]
  Language models (LMs) are known to suffer from hallucinations and misinformation. Retrieval augmented generation (RAG) that retrieves verifiable information from an external knowledge corpus provides a tangible solution to these problems. RAG generation quality is highly dependent on the relevance between a user's query and the retrieved documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T19:14:55Z)
• Controlling Risk of Retrieval-augmented Generation: A Counterfactual Prompting Framework [77.45983464131977]
  We focus on how likely it is that a RAG model's prediction is incorrect, resulting in uncontrollable risks in real-world applications.<n>Our research identifies two critical latent factors affecting RAG's confidence in its predictions.<n>We develop a counterfactual prompting framework that induces the models to alter these factors and analyzes the effect on their answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T14:52:14Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.