Analyzing the Correlation Between Hallucinations and Knowledge Conflicts in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08705v1
• Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2026 16:03:14 GMT
• Title: Analyzing the Correlation Between Hallucinations and Knowledge Conflicts in Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: Hallucinations are one of the most challenging limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>This paper investigates whether internal representations linked to knowledge conflicts correlate with hallucination behaviors in LLMs.
• Score: 9.132493644404445
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Hallucinations -- factually incorrect or unverifiable outputs -- remain one of the most challenging limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs), especially in knowledge-intensive tasks. One proposed explanation is internal knowledge conflicts arising from fixed, outdated training data. This paper investigates whether internal representations linked to knowledge conflicts correlate with hallucination behaviors in LLMs. Using probing techniques inspired by two prior works, we analyzed activations from hidden, attention, and MLP layers, as well as output logits, across predefined tasks. We probed LLaMA-3-8B on hallucination detection benchmarks and Falcon-7B on a knowledge conflict dataset. Our findings show that, although conceptually related, hallucination activation patterns cannot be fully reduced to or explained by knowledge conflict representations. Nonetheless, probing proves a robust tool across multiple languages and activation types, supporting its role in improving LLM interpretability. This work advances the broader understanding of hallucinations in LLMs and underscores the value of fine-grained analysis of their internal behavior.

Related papers

• HalluShift++: Bridging Language and Vision through Internal Representation Shifts for Hierarchical Hallucinations in MLLMs [17.130698952440316]
  hallucinations in large language models (MLLMs) have become increasingly crucial in the model development process.<n>We propose the hypothesis that hallucination manifests as measurable irregularities within the internal layer dynamics of MLLMs.<n>By incorporating such modifications, textsctextscHalluShift++ broadens the efficacy of hallucination detection from text-based large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T16:24:46Z)
• Large Language Models Hallucination: A Comprehensive Survey [3.8100688074986095]
  Large language models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing, achieving remarkable performance across diverse tasks.<n>Their impressive fluency often comes at the cost of producing false or fabricated information, a phenomenon known as hallucination.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive review of research on hallucination in LLMs, with a focus on causes, detection, and mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T20:26:38Z)
• Robust Multimodal Large Language Models Against Modality Conflict [94.12341487880465]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are prone to hallucinations in real-world scenarios.<n>We study the inherent conflicts in inputs from different modalities that place MLLMs in a dilemma and directly lead to hallucinations.<n>Three methods are proposed to alleviate the hallucination caused by modality conflict.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T11:18:38Z)
• Loki's Dance of Illusions: A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination in Large Language Models [46.71180299830997]
  Large language models (LLMs) sometimes produce information that appears factually accurate but is, in reality, fabricated.<n>The prevalence of these hallucinations can mislead users, affecting their judgments and decisions.<n>In sectors such as finance, law, and healthcare, such misinformation risks causing substantial economic losses, legal disputes, and health risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T10:50:08Z)
• MIRAGE: Assessing Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Chains of MLLM [58.2298313720146]
  Multimodal hallucinations are multi-sourced and arise from diverse causes.<n>Existing benchmarks fail to adequately distinguish between perception-induced hallucinations and reasoning-induced hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T05:54:36Z)
• Combating Multimodal LLM Hallucination via Bottom-Up Holistic Reasoning [151.4060202671114]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown unprecedented capabilities in advancing vision-language tasks.<n>This paper introduces a novel bottom-up reasoning framework to address hallucinations in MLLMs.<n>Our framework systematically addresses potential issues in both visual and textual inputs by verifying and integrating perception-level information with cognition-level commonsense knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-15T09:10:46Z)
• LLM Internal States Reveal Hallucination Risk Faced With a Query [62.29558761326031]
  Humans have a self-awareness process that allows us to recognize what we don't know when faced with queries. This paper investigates whether Large Language Models can estimate their own hallucination risk before response generation. By a probing estimator, we leverage LLM self-assessment, achieving an average hallucination estimation accuracy of 84.32% at run time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T17:08:52Z)
• Analyzing LLM Behavior in Dialogue Summarization: Unveiling Circumstantial Hallucination Trends [38.86240794422485]
  We evaluate the faithfulness of large language models for dialogue summarization. Our evaluation reveals subtleties as to what constitutes a hallucination. We introduce two prompt-based approaches for fine-grained error detection that outperform existing metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T17:49:47Z)
• Rowen: Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Hallucination Mitigation in LLMs [88.75700174889538]
  Hallucinations present a significant challenge for large language models (LLMs)<n>The utilization of parametric knowledge in generating factual content is constrained by the limited knowledge of LLMs.<n>We present Rowen, a novel framework that enhances LLMs with an adaptive retrieval augmentation process tailored to address hallucinated outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T11:55:40Z)
• Knowledge Verification to Nip Hallucination in the Bud [69.79051730580014]
  We demonstrate the feasibility of mitigating hallucinations by verifying and minimizing the inconsistency between external knowledge present in the alignment data and the intrinsic knowledge embedded within foundation LLMs. We propose a novel approach called Knowledge Consistent Alignment (KCA), which employs a well-aligned LLM to automatically formulate assessments based on external knowledge. We demonstrate the superior efficacy of KCA in reducing hallucinations across six benchmarks, utilizing foundation LLMs of varying backbones and scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T15:39:49Z)
• Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models [124.90671698586249]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of downstream tasks.<n>LLMs occasionally generate content that diverges from the user input, contradicts previously generated context, or misaligns with established world knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-03T16:56:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.