The Agentic Web Requires New Normative Infrastructure

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10711v1
• Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 11:15:48 GMT
• Title: The Agentic Web Requires New Normative Infrastructure
• Abstract summary: The agentic web, in which users interact with the internet largely through AI agents acting on their behalf, is now technically feasible.<n>However, many of the consumer and social benefits that could be realized by online AI agents are currently obstructed by outdated laws, terms of service, and other less formal practices.<n>This paper aims to help precipitate that conversation, to identify normative principles that can guide it, and to advocate for policies that enable users' appropriately delegated agents to act online on their behalf.
• Score: 3.2126829236183774
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The agentic web, in which users interact with the internet largely through agents acting on their behalf, is now technically feasible. However, many of the consumer and social benefits that could be realized by online AI agents acting scrupulously in their principals' interest are currently obstructed by outdated laws, terms of service, and other less formal practices which allow online platforms to block and degrade agent access, often in secret. No distinction is currently drawn between "malicious bots" and AI agents acting with the express delegated authority of a user. For the agentic web to realize its promise, it needs not only the technical infrastructure of protocols and interfaces, but the normative infrastructure of a broadly-accepted and socially-beneficial set of laws, norms and practices governing agentic access to online properties. Building that normative infrastructure requires a society-wide conversation. This paper aims to help precipitate that conversation, to identify normative principles that can guide it, and to advocate for policies that enable users' appropriately delegated agents to act online on their behalf, with as few curbs on their doing so as is reasonable given the other legitimate interests at stake.

Related papers

• How Agents Ask for Permission: User Permissions for AI Agents, from Interfaces to Enforcement [55.966820779528376]
  As AI agents gain prevalence, users are increasingly exposed to the risks such systems entail.<n> Prompt injection attacks, as well as hallucination, can cause agents to leak private information to third parties.<n>As autonomous systems, agents present the more active danger of performing sensitive tasks, such as bank transactions, without the user's intent or authorization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T11:36:22Z)
• Foundation Protocol: A Coordination Layer for Agentic Society [78.01727114524464]
  Foundation Protocol (FP) is a graph-first coordination layer for an emerging human-AI society.<n>FP unifies heterogeneous entities, including agents, tools, resources, humans, institutions, and organizations.<n>The aim is to keep autonomous agency composable while keeping accountability non-negotiable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T04:20:35Z)
• Distributed Legal Infrastructure for a Trustworthy Agentic Web [3.8915860916475165]
  The agentic web marks a structural transition from a human-centered information network to a digital environment populated by artificial intelligence (AI) agents.<n>This article advances a distributed legal infrastructure (DLI), a governance paradigm composed of five interlocking layers.<n>This reference framework contributes to emerging research on embedding legality within agentic web infrastructure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T21:03:32Z)
• On the Regulatory Potential of User Interfaces for AI Agent Governance [27.951021158233587]
  We propose regulating user interfaces of AI agents as a way of enforcing transparency and behavioral requirements.<n>We analyze 22 existing agentic systems to identify UI elements that play key roles in human-agent interaction and communication.<n>Our work exposes a new surface for regulatory action that supplements previous proposals for practical AI agent governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-30T05:32:13Z)
• Building the Web for Agents: A Declarative Framework for Agent-Web Interaction [0.7116403133334644]
  We introduce VOIX, a web-native framework that enables websites to expose reliable, auditable, and privacy-preserving capabilities for AI agents.<n> VOIX introduces tool> and context> tags, allowing developers to explicitly define available actions and relevant state.<n>We evaluated the framework's practicality, learnability, and expressiveness in a three-day hackathon study with 16 developers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T13:23:34Z)
• Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
  The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z)
• The Agentic Economy [46.77230659526348]
  We argue that the more profound economic impact lies in reducing communication frictions between consumers and businesses.<n>This shift could reorganize markets, redistribute power, and catalyze the creation of new products and services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T17:51:36Z)
• Internet of Agents: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges [68.9543153075464]
  We introduce the Internet of Agents (IoA) as a foundational framework that enables seamless interconnection, dynamic discovery, and collaborative orchestration among heterogeneous agents at scale.<n>We analyze the key operational enablers of IoA, including capability notification and discovery, adaptive communication protocols, dynamic task matching, consensus and conflict-resolution mechanisms, and incentive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T02:04:37Z)
• Build Agent Advocates, Not Platform Agents [5.524360691653674]
  Language model agents are poised to mediate how people navigate and act online.<n>If the companies that already dominate internet search, communication, and commerce control these agents, the resulting platform agents will deepen surveillance.<n>This position paper argues that we should promote user-controlled agents that safeguard individual autonomy and choice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-07T11:45:38Z)
• Infrastructure for AI Agents [3.373674048991415]
  We propose the concept of textbfagent infrastructure: technical systems and shared protocols external to AI agents.<n>We identify three functions for agent infrastructure: 1) attributing actions to specific agents, their users, or other actors; 2) shaping agents' interactions; and 3) detecting and remedying harmful actions from agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-17T10:58:12Z)
• Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agents [4.679384754914167]
  We introduce a novel framework for authenticated, authorized, and auditable delegation of authority to AI agents.<n>We propose a framework for translating flexible, natural language permissions into auditable access control configurations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T17:11:21Z)
• Internet of Agents: Weaving a Web of Heterogeneous Agents for Collaborative Intelligence [79.5316642687565]
  Existing multi-agent frameworks often struggle with integrating diverse capable third-party agents. We propose the Internet of Agents (IoA), a novel framework that addresses these limitations. IoA introduces an agent integration protocol, an instant-messaging-like architecture design, and dynamic mechanisms for agent teaming and conversation flow control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T17:33:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.