Gender-based discrepancies in the algorithmic delivery of political ads on social media

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10834v1
• Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 13:23:17 GMT
• Title: Gender-based discrepancies in the algorithmic delivery of political ads on social media
• Abstract summary: We examine gender-based discrimination in the delivery of political ads during the 2024 European Parliament elections.<n>Men were significantly more likely to be shown ads from populist and far-right parties than women.<n>Such imbalances restrict the ability of parties to reach diverse audiences and prevent voters from engaging equally with the full range of political viewpoints.
• Score: 33.63446818920968
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Social media has become a key channel for political advertising during election campaigns. However, algorithmic biases in the delivery of these ads may distort the public's exposure to political messaging. This can hinder citizens' ability to make informed choices and undermine equal access to political discourse, raising concerns about the integrity of electoral processes. In this study, we examine gender-based discrimination in the delivery of political ads during the 2024 European Parliament elections. Using a large-scale dataset of over 110000 ads from 453 political parties and 968 candidates that generated over 7 billion impressions across 25 EU countries, we find that men were significantly more likely to be shown ads from populist and far-right parties than women -- even after accounting for ad content, platform-level competition, and targeting strategies. All else equal, ads by populist parties reach, on average, a 6 percentage point higher male share. Such imbalances restrict the ability of parties to reach diverse audiences and prevent voters from engaging equally with the full range of political viewpoints. This pattern is particularly concerning given that far-right and populist ads may reinforce political polarization and widen existing gender gaps in political engagement. Our findings underscore the need for platforms and policymakers to audit algorithmic ad delivery in political campaigns on social media and to implement safeguards that ensure fairness and protect democratic processes.

Related papers

• "Talking past each other": Issue ownership and microtargeting in Swiss online political ads [0.3384279376065155]
  This paper presents a large-scale, data-driven analysis of 40k political ads published on Facebook and Instagram in Switzerland between 2021 and 2025.<n>It shows that political ads are used not only for federal elections, but also to influence referenda, where greater exposure to pro-Yes'' advertising correlates significantly with approval outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-16T16:35:02Z)
• Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis [51.95395936342771]
  We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus.<n>We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.<n>Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T20:30:20Z)
• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
  We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising. It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images. We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z)
• The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
  We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries.<n>We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z)
• On Detecting Policy-Related Political Ads: An Exploratory Analysis of Meta Ads in 2022 French Election [8.191542320784347]
  The budget spent solely on political advertising in the U.S. has increased by more than 100% from $700 million during the 2017-2018 U.S. election cycle to $1.6 billion during the 2020 U.S. presidential elections. The capacity offered by online platforms to micro-target ads with political content has been worrying lawmakers, journalists, and online platforms. Online platforms and regulators have agreed that researchers, journalists, and civil society need to be able to scrutinize the political ads running on large online platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T09:04:43Z)
• Political advertisement on Facebook and Instagram in the run up to 2022 Italian general election [0.9496529663479973]
  We study the extent to which political ads were delivered on Facebook and Instagram in the run up to 2022 Italian general election. We analyze over 23 k unique ads paid by 2.7 k unique sponsors, with an associated amount spent of 4 M EUR and over 1 billion views generated. We find results that are in accordance with their political agenda and the electoral outcome.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T13:37:18Z)
• Weakly Supervised Learning for Analyzing Political Campaigns on Facebook [24.29993132301275]
  We propose a weakly supervised approach to identify the stance and issue of political ads on Facebook. We analyze the temporal dynamics of the political ads on election polls.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T15:35:37Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)
• Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job Ads [70.02478301291264]
  We develop a new methodology for black-box auditing of algorithms for discrimination in the delivery of job advertisements. Our first contribution is to identify the distinction between skew in ad delivery due to protected categories such as gender or race. Second, we develop an auditing methodology that distinguishes between skew explainable by differences in qualifications from other factors. Third, we apply our proposed methodology to two prominent targeted advertising platforms for job ads: Facebook and LinkedIn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T17:38:36Z)
• Understanding the Complexity of Detecting Political Ads [0.9391375268580806]
  We take an empirical approach to analyze what kind of ads are deemed political by ordinary people and what kind of ads lead to disagreement. Our results imply that it is important to consider social issue ads as political, but they also complicate political advertising regulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-01T07:44:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.