The Standard Interpretable Model: A general theory of interpretable machine learning to deductively design interpretable methods using Lagrangian mechanics
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12289v1
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:26:22 GMT
- Title: The Standard Interpretable Model: A general theory of interpretable machine learning to deductively design interpretable methods using Lagrangian mechanics
- Abstract summary: We introduce the Standard Interpretable Model (SIM), a theory grounded in Lagrangian mechanics that enables the deductive design of interpretable methods.<n>We empirically show that the SIM identifies and solves limitations of existing methods.<n>The SIM offers pedagogical grounding for interpretability curricula and may shift the scientific community's perspective of a discipline that has long been fragmented.
- Score: 37.30653132093503
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: As Artificial Intelligence models grow in complexity, interpretability has become an indispensable tool for understanding, debugging, and controlling their computations. However, interpretability lacks general theories to deductively design interpretable methods. This gap between theories and methods results in a fragmented literature and inconsistent evaluation protocols. To fill this gap, we introduce the Standard Interpretable Model (SIM), a general theory grounded in Lagrangian mechanics that enables the deductive design of interpretable methods. Specifically, the SIM summarises, in a set of premises, what interpretability is for a target user. From these premises, the SIM systematically derives interpretability symmetries and corresponding constraints, which shape the landscape of a Lagrangian whose minima correspond to optimal interpretable models. To reach the minima, one can either update the parameter values of an opaque model to make it more interpretable or compile constraints into an interpretable architecture. We empirically show that the SIM identifies and solves limitations of existing methods (including traditional, concept-based, and mechanistic interpretability), highlights underexplored research directions, and informs the design of core programming interfaces. Beyond being a research method, the deductive nature of the SIM offers pedagogical grounding for interpretability curricula and may shift the scientific community's perspective of a discipline that has long been fragmented.
Related papers
- Tracking Equivalent Mechanistic Interpretations Across Neural Networks [13.885265796951705]
Mechanistic interpretability (MI) is an emerging framework for interpreting neural networks.<n>We propose and formalize the principle that two interpretations of a model are equivalent if all of their possible implementations are also equivalent.<n>We provide guarantees that simultaneously relate a model's algorithmic interpretations, circuits, and representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-31T16:57:52Z) - Beyond the Black Box: Identifiable Interpretation and Control in Generative Models via Causal Minimality [52.57416398859353]
We show that causal minimality can endow latent representations of diffusion vision and autoregressive language models with clear causal interpretation and robust, component-wise identifiable control.<n>We introduce a novel theoretical framework for hierarchical selection models, where higher-level concepts emerge from the constrained composition of lower-level variables.<n>These causally grounded concepts serve as levers for fine-grained model steering, paving the way for transparent, reliable systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-11T14:59:14Z) - LTD-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models by Letting Them Draw [57.237152905238084]
LTD-Bench is a breakthrough benchmark for large language models (LLMs)<n>It transforms LLM evaluation from abstract scores to directly observable visual outputs by requiring models to generate drawings through dot matrices or executable code.<n> LTD-Bench's visual outputs enable powerful diagnostic analysis, offering a potential approach to investigate model similarity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-04T08:11:23Z) - Information Science Principles of Machine Learning: A Causal Chain Meta-Framework Based on Formalized Information Mapping [7.299890614172539]
This study addresses key challenges in machine learning, namely the absence of a unified formal theoretical framework and the lack of foundational theories for model interpretability and ethical safety.<n>We first construct a formal information model, explicitly defining the ontological states and carrier mappings of typical machine learning stages.<n>By introducing learnable and processable predicates, as well as learning and processing functions, we analyze the causal chain logic and constraint laws governing machine learning processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-19T14:39:41Z) - No Equations Needed: Learning System Dynamics Without Relying on Closed-Form ODEs [56.78271181959529]
This paper proposes a conceptual shift to modeling low-dimensional dynamical systems by departing from the traditional two-step modeling process.<n>Instead of first discovering a closed-form equation and then analyzing it, our approach, direct semantic modeling, predicts the semantic representation of the dynamical system.<n>Our approach not only simplifies the modeling pipeline but also enhances the transparency and flexibility of the resulting models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-30T18:36:48Z) - Towards Compositional Interpretability for XAI [3.3768167170511587]
We present an approach to defining AI models and their interpretability based on category theory.
We compare a wide range of AI models as compositional models.
We find that what makes the standard 'intrinsically interpretable' models so transparent is brought out most clearly diagrammatically.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T14:27:03Z) - Linearly-Interpretable Concept Embedding Models for Text Analysis [9.340843984411137]
We propose a novel Linearly Interpretable Concept Embedding Model (LICEM)<n>LICEMs classification accuracy is better than existing interpretable models and matches black-box ones.<n>We show that the explanations provided by our models are more interveneable and causally consistent with respect to existing solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T14:04:53Z) - Discovering Interpretable Physical Models using Symbolic Regression and
Discrete Exterior Calculus [55.2480439325792]
We propose a framework that combines Symbolic Regression (SR) and Discrete Exterior Calculus (DEC) for the automated discovery of physical models.
DEC provides building blocks for the discrete analogue of field theories, which are beyond the state-of-the-art applications of SR to physical problems.
We prove the effectiveness of our methodology by re-discovering three models of Continuum Physics from synthetic experimental data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-10T13:23:05Z) - Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey [59.67574757137078]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing.
This paper introduces a taxonomy of explainability techniques and provides a structured overview of methods for explaining Transformer-based language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-02T22:14:26Z) - Understanding Interpretability by generalized distillation in Supervised
Classification [3.5473853445215897]
Recent interpretation strategies focus on human understanding of the underlying decision mechanisms of the complex Machine Learning models.
We propose an interpretation-by-distillation formulation that is defined relative to other ML models.
We evaluate our proposed framework on the MNIST, Fashion-MNIST and Stanford40 datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-05T17:42:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.