Scale Buys Interpolation, Structure Buys a Horizon: Certified Predictability for Equivariant World Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.13092v1
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 09:21:28 GMT
- Title: Scale Buys Interpolation, Structure Buys a Horizon: Certified Predictability for Equivariant World Models
- Abstract summary: A world model's average error says nothing about whether a prediction can be trusted, or for how long.<n>For equivariant latent world models we give a computable, multi-step certificate of the predictable horizon.<n>On 40-D Lorenz-96 only a $mathbbZN$-equivariant network recovers the full Lyapunov spectrum.
- Score: 6.230579198456525
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Scale buys interpolation; structure buys a certified horizon. A world model's average error says nothing about whether a particular prediction can be trusted, or for how long. For equivariant latent world models we give a computable, multi-step certificate of the predictable horizon: $T$-step rollout error is provably constant over each symmetry orbit (Theorem A) and stratified channel-by-channel by the predictor's Lyapunov spectrum, $T_j(ε)\sim\log(1/ε)/λ_j$. The horizon is two-sided -- a matching lower bound makes approximate equivariance provably horizon-limited -- and the certificate is exclusive to structure: orbit-constant error characterizes equivariance, so no non-equivariant model has it at any scale. Empirically, on 40-D Lorenz-96 only a $\mathbb{Z}_N$-equivariant network recovers the full Lyapunov spectrum ($R^2{=}0.98$); dense and recurrent baselines fail. Because the spectrum is faithful, the certificate acts, a priori: under a fixed sensing budget a $c\times$-inflated certificate provably needs $c\times$ the budget, and the equivariant certificate meets a budget its inflated dense counterpart cannot -- with zero calibration data. The same read-out, unchanged, audits public pretrained world models training-free: TD-MPC2 checkpoints land on the certificate's own scope taxonomy -- calibrated where strongly expansive (ratio 0.94-1.02), optimistic where weakly expansive, correctly abstaining where contracting -- a map a deployed monitor replicates cell-by-cell, out-of-sample. Across the official 1M-317M multitask ladder, calibration does not improve with parameters. On V-JEPA 2-AC (1B, real robot data) the measured cross-check correctly overrides an over-promising tangent spectrum -- the cross-validated audit, not the raw number, is the deployable object. Scale buys interpolation, not a calibrated horizon.
Related papers
- Observation Design for Certified Control Authority: Projection--Estimability Separation and Active-Face Equivalence [2.7954473524479275]
A gate executes only actions it can certify, and certifies only what its observations support.<n>This paper asks how observations should be designed to maximize the set of actions that can be safely admitted.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-05T07:57:04Z) - EDGE: a closed-form directed test for the calibration of probabilistic binary classifiers [0.0]
We propose EDGE, a calibration test for the canonical probabilistic classifier, logistic regression.<n> EDGE reads the same binned predicted-observed table a reliability diagram plots, and projects its standardized bin residuals onto a small pre-specified basis of smooth calibration-distortion.<n>Across link and feature misspecification the pre-specified default led or tied every rival binned test on the fitted index in 19 of 22 detectable scenarios, and stayed computable where the refit-based Stukel score test separates in 20% to 28% of samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-20T19:06:05Z) - Sound and Efficient Certification of High-Quality Qubit Operations: Theory and Experiment [23.48673361417131]
We introduce a sound black-box certification protocol for a single-qubit gate based on a small set of fixed, deterministic sequences.<n>From the data, the protocol derives finite-sample bounds on the gate's rotation eigenvalue, a gauge-invariant property.<n>We prove that these spectral constraints imply, up to a physically meaningful unitary change of basis, a rigorous average gate-fidelity lower bound for every time-independent qubit model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-17T18:03:00Z) - Intrinsic Structure: Spectral Identifiability for Mechanistic Interpretability [51.56484100374058]
We prove the first identifiability theorem for a mechanistic-interpretability primitive.<n>The spectrum is an identifiable, model-intrinsic fingerprint with a stated error bar, not a legible decomposition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-10T19:42:01Z) - Conformal Orbit-Valid Trust Horizons for Equivariant World Models [6.230579198456525]
We study trust-horizon certification for latent world models with known group symmetries.<n>Across 50 stable audits, we observe zero anti-conservative violations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-23T06:44:27Z) - Is Spurious Correlation Removal Always Learnable? [56.28155520961125]
Invariant learning can fail even when the structure is statistically identifiable.<n>We show a conditional computational barrier: under a black-box samplable supervised sparse recovery primitive, there exist emphamplable multi-dimensional environments.<n>Synthetic and real datasets illustrate the predicted gaps and transitions and motivate simple diversity diagnostics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-11T05:49:43Z) - Beyond Point Estimates: Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification Methods on the AION-1 Astronomical Foundation Model [47.71489969727656]
Conformalized Quantile Regression (CQR) delivers the best coverage in the bin with the poorest model predictions.<n>Only the Locally Valid and Discriminative (LVD) framework provides finite-sample emphlocal validity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-05T18:29:19Z) - When Does LeJEPA Learn a World Model? [48.74247491501631]
A representation that scrambles the true degrees of freedom of the world cannot support reliable planning or compositional generalization.<n>We prove that LeJEPA linearly recovers the world's latent variables from nonlinear observations, a property known as linear identifiability.<n>We validate the theory with experiments ranging from 2D examples to 1024-dimensional latents, including distributional ablations and pixel-based robotic control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-25T22:56:26Z) - Wavelet Variance Equipartition as a Threshold for World-Model Quality and Quantum Kernel TN-Simulability [0.0]
We identify the wavelet scaling exponent $$ as a critical diagnostic.<n>We establish $= 1/2$ as a sharp transition boundary for the classical simulability of amplitude-encoded quantum kernels.<n>We prove this variance scales strictly as $Var[X] = (d-2)$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T05:41:12Z) - Adaptive Calibration in Non-Stationary Environments [44.81344039432424]
We develop a suite of algorithms that achieve adaptive calibration guarantees under multiple calibration measures.<n>Our approach builds on and extends prior work [Hu et al., 2026, Luo et al., 2025], introducing a novel non-uniform partition of the prediction space that allocates finer resolution near the underlying ground truth.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T04:06:40Z) - Correction and Corruption: A Two-Rate View of Error Flow in LLM Protocols [51.56484100374058]
We propose a paired-outcome measurement interface for auditing a single protocol step on exact-match tasks.<n>For each instance, the interface records a baseline correctness bit and a post-step correctness bit.<n>These rates predict accuracy changes and define a reusable empirical interface testable across seeds, mixtures, and pipelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-20T13:25:40Z) - The Geometric Canary: Predicting Steerability and Detecting Drift via Representational Stability [0.0]
We show that geometric stability, the consistency of a representation's pairwise distance structure, addresses two functions.<n> unsupervised stability fails entirely for steering on real-world tasks.<n>It excels at drift detection, measuring nearly $2times$ greater geometric change than CKA during post-training alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-20T01:24:45Z) - Minimax Optimality and Spectral Routing for Majority-Vote Ensembles under Markov Dependence [6.908972852063454]
Majority-vote ensembles achieve variance reduction by averaging over diverse, approximately independent base learners.<n>We provide a minimax characterization of this phenomenon for discrete classification in a fixed-dimensional Markov setting.<n>Experiments on synthetic Markov chains, 2D spatial grids, the 128-dataset UCR archive, and Atari DQN ensembles validate the theoretical predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-15T02:32:30Z) - Reinforcement Learning from Multi-Source Imperfect Preferences: Best-of-Both-Regimes Regret [71.69884486156359]
We study episodic RL from emphmulti-source imperfect preferences through a cumulative imperfection budget.<n>We propose a unified algorithm with regret $tildeO(sqrtK/M+)$, which exhibits a best-of-both-regimes behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-20T19:34:53Z) - Optimal Unconstrained Self-Distillation in Ridge Regression: Strict Improvements, Precise Asymptotics, and One-Shot Tuning [61.07540493350384]
Self-distillation (SD) is the process of retraining a student on a mixture of ground-truth and the teacher's own predictions.<n>We show that for any prediction risk, the optimally mixed student improves upon the ridge teacher for every regularization level.<n>We propose a consistent one-shot tuning method to estimate $star$ without grid search, sample splitting, or refitting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-19T17:21:15Z) - Witness wedges in fidelity-deviation plane: separating teleportation advantage and Bell-inequality violation [0.0]
We develop a unified framework to analyze quantum teleportation through the joint geometry of two complementary figures of merit.<n>In particular, any measured pair $(F D)$ can be ported into a visibility estimate for isotropic resources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-26T05:43:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.