FUSE: Quantifying Uncertainty in Vision-Language Models by Bayesian Fusing Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14728v1
• Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2026 22:11:00 GMT
• Title: FUSE: Quantifying Uncertainty in Vision-Language Models by Bayesian Fusing Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty
• Abstract summary: In many applications, such as robotics, it is crucial to quantify the uncertainty in the output of vision-language models.<n>We develop FUSE, a probabilistic framework for capturing two complementary sources of uncertainty in vision-language modeling.
• Score: 20.637224080557534
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) are playing an increasingly important role across multiple domains. In many applications, such as robotics, it is crucial to quantify the uncertainty in the output of these models. } We develop FUSE, a probabilistic framework for capturing two complementary sources of uncertainty in vision-language modeling: (i) aleatoric embedding-level uncertainty derived from input data vision-language ambiguity, and (ii) epistemic model-level uncertainty estimated from the semantic response diversity of VLMs. Our approach formulates a Bayesian fusion mechanism that analytically combines these uncertainty sources to produce a scalar measure of uncertainty. This measure can be used to reliably predict the model's output correctness for downstream applications. We demonstrate that our method outperforms baselines and achieves SOTA uncertainty calibration.

Related papers

• It depends: Incorporating correlations for joint aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties of high-dimensional output spaces [23.472868138533926]
  Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) plays a vital role in enhancing the reliability of deep learning model predictions.<n>This paper addresses the dual nature of uncertainty, focusing on their joint integration in high-dimensional regression tasks.<n>We propose a novel approach that approximates the resulting joint uncertainty using a low-rank plus diagonal covariance structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T13:08:17Z)
• Dynamic Distribution-Aware Uncertainty Tracking in Vision-Language Representation Learning [13.524679557181997]
  Uncertainty Quantification aims to measure the reliability of model predictions.<n>Post-hoc approaches are widely adopted due to their lightweight nature.<n>We propose a Dynamic Distribution-Aware Uncertainty Quantification framework (DDA-UQ) that shifts the paradigm from static mapping to a dynamic distribution-aware process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T01:53:28Z)
• The Illusion of Certainty: Uncertainty quantification for LLMs fails under ambiguity [48.899855816199484]
  We introduce MAQA* and AmbigQA*, the first ambiguous question-answering (QA) datasets equipped with ground-truth answer distributions.<n>We show that predictive-distribution and ensemble-based estimators are fundamentally limited under ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T14:46:35Z)
• Efficient semantic uncertainty quantification in language models via diversity-steered sampling [46.23327887393273]
  We introduce a diversity-steered sampler that discourages semantically redundant outputs during decoding.<n>Key idea is to inject a continuous semantic-similarity penalty into the model's proposal distribution.<n>Being modular and requiring no gradient access to the base LLM, the framework promises to serve as a drop-in enhancement for uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T10:06:21Z)
• ESI: Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification via Semantic-preserving Intervention for Large Language Models [23.44710972442814]
  Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is a promising approach to improve model reliability, yet the uncertainty of Large Language Models (LLMs) is non-trivial.<n>We propose a novel grey-box uncertainty quantification method that measures the variation in model outputs before and after semantic-preserving intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T02:46:43Z)
• Towards Reliable LLM-based Robot Planning via Combined Uncertainty Estimation [68.106428321492]
  Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate advanced reasoning abilities, enabling robots to understand natural language instructions and generate high-level plans with appropriate grounding.<n>LLMs hallucinations present a significant challenge, often leading to overconfident yet potentially misaligned or unsafe plans.<n>We present Combined Uncertainty estimation for Reliable Embodied planning (CURE), which decomposes the uncertainty into epistemic and intrinsic uncertainty, each estimated separately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T10:26:58Z)
• Simple Yet Effective: An Information-Theoretic Approach to Multi-LLM Uncertainty Quantification [9.397157329808254]
  MUSE is a simple information-theoretic method to identify and aggregate well-calibrated subsets of large language models.<n> Experiments on binary prediction tasks demonstrate improved calibration and predictive performance compared to single-model and na"ive ensemble baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T19:13:25Z)
• Probabilistic Modeling of Disparity Uncertainty for Robust and Efficient Stereo Matching [61.73532883992135]
  We propose a new uncertainty-aware stereo matching framework.<n>We adopt Bayes risk as the measurement of uncertainty and use it to separately estimate data and model uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T23:28:20Z)
• Enhancing Trust in Large Language Models with Uncertainty-Aware Fine-Tuning [10.457661605916435]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the field of natural language processing with their impressive reasoning and question-answering capabilities.<n>LLMs are sometimes prone to generating credible-sounding but incorrect information, a phenomenon known as hallucinations.<n>We introduce a novel uncertainty-aware causal language modeling loss function, grounded in the principles of decision theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T23:14:47Z)
• Know Where You're Uncertain When Planning with Multimodal Foundation Models: A Formal Framework [54.40508478482667]
  We present a comprehensive framework to disentangle, quantify, and mitigate uncertainty in perception and plan generation.<n>We propose methods tailored to the unique properties of perception and decision-making.<n>We show that our uncertainty disentanglement framework reduces variability by up to 40% and enhances task success rates by 5% compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T17:32:00Z)
• Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
  Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode. We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z)
• Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensembling [69.83976050879318]
  In large language models (LLMs), identifying sources of uncertainty is an important step toward improving reliability, trustworthiness, and interpretability. In this paper, we introduce an uncertainty decomposition framework for LLMs, called input clarification ensembling. Our approach generates a set of clarifications for the input, feeds them into an LLM, and ensembles the corresponding predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T05:58:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.